A very expensive oopsie

Channel
The Magic Cocktail😜
@hawkm96
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001795170679 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hawkm96 |
| Description | Everything for Everybody |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hawkm96 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 8 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 8 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈19,800
- Videos
- ≈19,800
- Links
- ≈33,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5m 52s
- Average length
- 44s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Dr. John Campbell: "1 in every 35 people injected with mRNA COVID 'vaccine' has myocardial heart injury!" "And yet, it's still being actively & unethically promoted. Don't take the risk. This is complete madness."
Video, posted without a caption
PARENTS: THIS IS WHAT GETS INJECTED INTO YOUR CHILD’S BODY IN THE FIRST 6 YEARS OF LIFE from the recommendation of AAP and other stooges of big pharma. If you follow the full childhood vaccine schedule, your baby receives all of this — cumulative amounts delivered straight into their bloodstream: • 17,500 mcg 2-phenoxyethanol (antifreeze) • 5,700 mcg aluminum (neurotoxin) • Unknown amounts of fetal bovine serum (ab…
Brazil - 28 year old model & journalist Thais Belem took COVID-19 Vaccines in 2021 She developed Turbo Brain Cancer in 2023 & died on Sep.13, 2024 Millions of young COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinated people have increased risk of cancer for the rest of their lives! #cdnpoli #ableg
According to Senator Johnson, Fauci knew the mRNA COVID shot resulted in an 82% miscarriage rate in the first trimester. The governor of Massachusetts just signed a late term abortion bill that allows babies to be aborted right up to birth. Sounds like these two would be natural friends. #Truth #MAGA #MAHA
הודעות טקסט חשפו כי פאוצ'י הזהיר בחשאי מפני סיכון של הפלות כתוצאה מחיסון לקוביד בנשים בהריון, בעוד שבפומבי הוא טען שאין בעיות. 💦חדשות העולם החדש💦 https://t.me/galkoren
המנתח הכללי של ארה"ב מתקופת ביידן ויווק מורטי הגיב לפאוצ'י שהוא "שמע דאגה לגבי ה-mRNA הגורם למוטציות גם בעובר המתפתח" @disclosetv 💦חדשות העולם החדש💦 https://t.me/galkoren
Moderna's New FDA Approved mRNA flu 💉had 29 sudden or unexpected deaths in mRNA group (with ZERO autopsies) vs 12 in alt 💉group. If the trial was designed to show sudden deaths⏫it would be presented as statistically significant with a 142% increase in risk & ~ excess of 1 per 2116 people. H/t: Dr. Clare Craig Source: fda.gov/media/194140/d…
Dr. Robert Malone was a fraud from the beginning. Telling children not to be afraid of the shots, and on the 2021 rollout, he told the American public these shots could save their lives 2/3
RFK Jr uncontrollably shaking — clearly neurologically impaired. This was yesterday in the oval office with the announcement of their bogus vaccine reduction program He knows he’s sold out to Satan, that’s why he’s deteriorating. What they’re selling is a little less poisonous better than more poison
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hawkm96. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@DrJaneRuby · 58,6246 postsAustralians against vaccine mandates
@Australians_Against_Vax_Mandates · 6,5783 postsExposing 💊 The Truth
@Exposing_TheTruth · 2,0972 posts💦חדשות העולם החדש💦
@galkoren · 6,0822 posts⚫ חמ"ל ערים ⚫
@HamaIsrael · 3,9661 postOrwellian Dystopia
@OrwellianDystopia · 14,2451 postYeet All Jeets
@YeetAllJeets · 1,0731 postTomRenz
@attorneythomasrenz · 1,7991 postKalergi World
@kalergiworld · 1,0351 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@hawkm96 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Magic Cocktail😜” (@hawkm96), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hawkm96.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.