t.me/hetkantelpunt
💯34❤3🤡1🤮1🥱1

Channel
@hetkantelpunt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,335subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001683530044 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hetkantelpunt |
| Created | 16 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hetkantelpunt |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 8,335 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 8,337 | -4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 8,341 | -16 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 8,357 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 8,356 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 8,359 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 8,363 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 8,369 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 8,372 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 8,376 | +10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 8,366 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 8,374 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 8,377 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 8,377 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (12 July 2026 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,320 |
| Reactions total | 40 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,473 reactions across 33 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 369 | 25.1% | |
| 🤮 | 271 | 18.4% | |
| ❤ | 186 | 12.6% | |
| 👏 | 160 | 10.9% | |
| 🤬 | 117 | 7.94% | |
| 👍 | 84 | 5.70% | |
| 😁 | 77 | 5.23% | |
| 🙏 | 74 | 5.02% | |
| 👎 | 34 | 2.31% | |
| 💩 | 34 | 2.31% | |
| 🖕 | 23 | 1.56% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 1.09% | |
| 🤡 | 8 | 0.543% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 0.475% | |
| 💅 | 5 | 0.339% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.204% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.136% | |
| 🎅 | 1 | 0.068% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.068% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.068% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,473 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
t.me/hetkantelpunt
💯34❤3🤡1🤮1🥱1
Ze heeft gelijk t.me/hetkantelpunt
💩15💯10❤2🤮1
Haagse dwang lost de asielcrisis niet op. Asielminister Bart van den Brink is er klaar mee. Werken die 24 weigerachtige gemeenten dit najaar nog steeds niet mee? Dan zet hij de lokale politiek buitenspel en wijst Den Haag zelf de plekken aan. Hard tegen hard. Ergens snap ik de frustratie wel. De opvangcentra zitten overvol en de tijd van praten is een keer voorbij. Maar geloven we nou echt dat dit de oplossing is? …
❤3🔥3
t.me/hetkantelpunt
🙏31❤13💯8
t.me/hetkantelpunt
💯30🖕4🔥3💅1
"We zijn al 20 jaar in een burgeroorlog." t.me/hetkantelpunt
💯44🤡5😁4👏1💅1
Met twee maten meten op de snelweg? Ik snap er eerlijk gezegd weinig meer van. Als Extinction Rebellion keer op keer een snelweg blokkeert, blijft het vanuit Den Haag opvallend rustig. Maar zodra boeren actievoeren omdat ze zich zorgen maken over hun bedrijf en hun toekomst, staat Rob Jetten er ineens bovenop met de woorden: “volstrekt onacceptabel”. Begrijp me goed. Gevaarlijke situaties op de snelweg moeten we …
💯56👍41❤10🤮2😁2
Jetten exit. t.me/hetkantelpunt
🙏41👍12😁7👏4😱1
Sinds wanneer is een ME-peloton de oplossing voor falend asielbeleid? De vlam slaat in de pan in Surhuisterveen en Den Haag wijst meteen naar 'onruststokers' in de regio. Wat een makkelijke zondebok. Als de situatie op straat escaleert, ligt dat echt niet aan die dorpen die plotseling weigeren mee te werken. Kijk liever naar het échte probleem: een overheid die de regie volledig kwijt is. Een bus met 28 mensen die…
❤32💯13👎1🔥1
Nederland is NEXT. t.me/hetkantelpunt
💯29❤3
De trekkers staan niet voor niks op de weg. De kranten koppen weer over "wilde acties" en geblokkeerde rotondes rond Maarsbergen en Renswoude. Maar wat moeten onze boeren anders? Als Den Haag je met onhaalbare stikstofregels doelbewust met de rug tegen de muur zet, rest er nog maar één ding: de weg op en laten zien dat het klaar is. Achter elke blokkade op de N226 of N227 zit geen onwil, maar pure onmacht. Het zijn…
👏58❤3
🤣 t.me/hetkantelpunt
😁40❤5👏5🤬2
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @hetkantelpunt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Het Kantelpunt” (@hetkantelpunt), 8,335 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hetkantelpunt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.