Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hikikomori

Channel

Hikikomori

@hikikomori_on

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,480subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001092126372
TypeChannel
Username@hikikomori_on
DescriptionХикикомори — термин, обозначающий людей, отказывающихся от социальной жизни. вбросить монетку - https://dalink.to/hikkichan333 Купить рекламу (или в соо канала): https://telega.in/c/hikikomori_on правила - https://vk.cc/cVaplm № 4943492715
Created13 August 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hikikomori_on

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

29,45729,54129,4996 August 2026 — 29,519 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,519 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,518 subscribers7 August 2026 — 29,506 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,490 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,495 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,494 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,491 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,500 subscribers13 August 2026 — 29,504 subscribers15 August 2026 — 29,508 subscribers16 August 2026 — 29,496 subscribers17 August 2026 — 29,497 subscribers18 August 2026 — 29,499 subscribers19 August 2026 — 29,492 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,497 subscribers23 August 2026 — 29,502 subscribers25 August 2026 — 29,493 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,541 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,483 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,498 subscribers29 August 2026 — 29,499 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,490 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,492 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,490 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,492 subscribers3 September 2026 — 29,493 subscribers5 September 2026 — 29,488 subscribers8 September 2026 — 29,494 subscribers11 September 2026 — 29,513 subscribers13 September 2026 — 29,496 subscribers14 September 2026 — 29,488 subscribers16 September 2026 — 29,468 subscribers18 September 2026 — 29,457 subscribers25 September 2026 — 29,480 subscribers29,4806 August 202625 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,444–29,554 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 08:3729,480+23
18 Sept 2026, 22:0229,457-11
16 Sept 2026, 15:5729,468-20
14 Sept 2026, 16:4029,488-8
13 Sept 2026, 03:2229,496-17
11 Sept 2026, 07:1929,513+19
8 Sept 2026, 12:2129,494+6
5 Sept 2026, 03:5729,488-5
3 Sept 2026, 09:4329,493+1
2 Sept 2026, 04:2329,492+2
1 Sept 2026, 05:3629,490-2
31 Aug 2026, 07:2429,492+2
30 Aug 2026, 09:3929,490-9
29 Aug 2026, 06:3429,499+1
28 Aug 2026, 06:2229,498+15
27 Aug 2026, 07:0529,483-58
26 Aug 2026, 03:4629,541+48
25 Aug 2026, 01:1729,493-9
23 Aug 2026, 12:1829,502+5
20 Aug 2026, 18:4429,497first reading

Engagement

682 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.21%
avg views ÷ 29,480 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,120
251 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
252
of 682 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held682 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total533,307
Reactions total34,998
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 06:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈55,000
Videos
≈5,110
Links
≈2,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 26m
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 92 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

91,621 reactions across 669 posts, in 55 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤38,36641.9%
❤‍🔥8,0208.75%
💯5,4055.90%
😭5,3215.81%
💘4,7225.15%
🥰4,4164.82%
🤝3,9874.35%
💔3,6573.99%
😁1,9142.09%
🤗1,6481.80%
😢1,6171.76%
🔥1,4921.63%
🍓1,3601.48%
✍9621.05%
🤯7560.825%
😨7350.802%
🕊7170.783%
👍6130.669%
🤔4850.529%
🙏4790.523%
35 further kinds4,9495.40%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 681 of the 682 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93,449 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 682 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 681 we hold a reading for · 0.7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hikikomori_on. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 682 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.32%
9 of 682 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
9
posts carrying an erid · 9 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,200
over 9 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,150
over 672 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGxSM37130 August 202630 August 2026
2W5zFH952k1121 August 202621 August 2026
2W5zFHLhpuo114 August 202614 August 2026
2W5zFHSiV1T119 August 202619 August 2026
2W5zFHUPDKX112 August 202612 August 2026
2W5zFJ4KCXB125 August 202625 August 2026
2W5zFJPSdcV114 August 202614 August 2026
2W5zFJbkQwK16 September 20266 September 2026
2W5zFJpekxh115 August 202615 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 682 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 04:04 UTC738 views50 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Всю свою школьную жизнь я думала, что я ужасная социофобка. Я боялась попросить учебник у лучшей подруги или спросить, поставила она рюкзак на стул, что бы занять место для меня или потому что она не хочет меня видеть. Я боялась кушать в столовой, потому что мне бы пришлось сесть с одноклассниками. Я ненавидела ходить в школу, ненавидела их всех. Однажды дошло до того, что я плакала рядом с учительницей по истории и…

❤33🙏15🍓2

26 Sept 2026, 20:32 UTC≈2,230 views397 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

бэкрумс моего детства

❤‍🔥240😁77❤53💯16🔥4🙏4👍3

26 Sept 2026, 20:04 UTC≈2,220 views115 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Akuicia #art

❤80💋18👍10❤‍🔥3😭2🍓1💘1

26 Sept 2026, 19:32 UTC≈2,220 views158 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Кто-нибудь ещё устал слышать от врача, к которому обращается, что это несерьёзно, не имеет клинического значения, «это нормально», «всем такое бывает», «это недостаточно серьёзно»? Понимают ли они, что в результате вы просто перестаёте упоминать о каких-либо проблемах, потому что считаете, что все они не имеют значения? Мне однажды сказали: «Показатели лишь незначительно повышены, поэтому клинически незначимы», а по…

😭98💯33❤14🤗7🤝6

26 Sept 2026, 19:01 UTC≈2,370 views291 reactionsread 27 September 2026

возможно непопулярное мнение: лучше 12 часов работать на любой работе с минимальным взаимодействием с людьми, чем 7-8 часов унижаться перед людьми. любой человек, который работает с клиентурой и должен ей угождать, заслуживает огромную зарплату и медаль, потому что некоторых "клиентов" хочется придушить голыми руками я просто не могу этого выносить. #hikkikomorii

❤148💯113❤‍🔥20💔7😭2👏1

26 Sept 2026, 18:32 UTC≈2,360 views208 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤129😭47🤝30🍓2

26 Sept 2026, 18:01 UTC≈2,580 views188 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Сегодня Международный день кролика. Праздник учредило британское благотворительное «Общество домашних кроликов» в 1998 году, после чего он получил популярность по всему миру.

🥰124❤45🤩9🏆6💘3💋1

26 Sept 2026, 17:33 UTC≈2,220 views165 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😢91🤝43❤‍🔥17❤12⚡2

26 Sept 2026, 15:58 UTC≈1,340 views118 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤝69❤26😭15💯5👍2💘1

26 Sept 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,500 views77 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

гайд по рендерингу от rhinestar09 #draw

❤60💘16👀1

Showing the 12 most recent of 682 posts we hold for @hikikomori_on. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Пещера Вампаи 🦇
@NayaVampayaTG · 88
3 posts
Alv/a the bard
@alv_theBard · 126
2 posts
Ⓜ️.О.Р.С.
@mors_hse · 86
2 posts
вишня not dead
@wishnianshit · 30
2 posts
ĐEÆTH
@Hum_from_plan · 5
1 post
Тартали Софьен
@TartaliSofien · 34
1 post
Шелест книжных страниц
@book_pages1 · 197
1 post
cat confession
@caaaaaaaaaaatconf · 1
1 post
какого дьявола ты здесь шумишь
@dipooshya · 25
1 post
Мальмё, чай, не Польша // рест
@floralispyrodictuim · 20
1 post
фокусник катастрофа, хорошие вибрации
@fokusnikkatastrofa · 54
1 post
Сибирский филиал культа Псыжа
@huuuqoret · 30
1 post
aquila favonia when????
@iloveukaeya · 10
1 post
🪄@kankatrin
@imcutebutscorpio · 76
1 post
jopa in june
@jopavjune · 1,007
1 post
переезд • Милена.
@laxvartmilenaiqo · 4
1 post
Берлога Мармари
@marmariandbooks · 241
1 post
sᴜɴᴀ ɴᴏ ᴏsʜɪʀᴏ [🇲‌🇪‌🇬‌🇦‌🇲‌🇮‌ 🇱‌🇦‌🇱‌🇦‌🇱‌🇦‌]
@megamiisback · 48
1 post
Комбуча на соевом|AVbT
@mishchtotopishet · 24
1 post
небо без звезд. (архив)
@nebo_bez_zvezd · 97
1 post
blind spot
@nikomill · 51
1 post
она старается
@onigirimaker · 29
1 post
Распили меня болгаркой
@pandemicedemic · 112
1 post
кря кря
@quack_quack_channel · 187
1 post
🐺🌚рерилайны🌝🐺| Rerir & Laina oc x canon☽
@rerirswife · 33
1 post
На вас накаркала Ворона
@sadvorena · 103
1 post
cehutt
@torimommy · 27
1 post
Tortic sh!tpost
@tortic_shp · 15
1 post
АРХИВ. дашкина
@weuweuweuweuwe · 6
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Neural Machine
@neuralmachine · 48,649
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026
Шикимори
@shikimori · 25,746
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 September 2026
Сегодня я спиздила мем🐁
@today_i_stole_some_memes · 24,197
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 16 September 2026
идзая : бинго ; интерактивы ; опросы
@ord0favonius · 44,982
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 27 August 2026
Игровой Канал Блэка [BlackUFA] 🎮
@blackufa_official · 52,510
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
AlexandriA l Аниме Новости
@advance_emp · 50,184
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Stable Waifu | BLOG
@StableWaifu · 51,275
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 24 August 2026
всемприветик это хомалон
@ohhomeall · 23,122
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 21 September 2026
OverFire / Overwatch
@overfire_ru · 45,041
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
catharsis
@truecatharsis · 48,564
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
Reddit | Genshin Leaks
@genshinreddit · 51,601
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 25 August 2026
Бестиа́рий
@bestiariy_mif · 72,995
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Reddit | Zenless
@zenlessleak · 24,432
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
ЛУЧ | Добро и милота
@luchdobro · 20,587
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 September 2026
Genshin Impact Lore
@genshin_lore · 88,642
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
Вести от Паймон
@paimon_leaks · 124,772
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hikikomori” (@hikikomori_on), 29,480 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hikikomori_on.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.