Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -48,042. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 745,624–808,078 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 01:20
752,830
-2,192
15 Sept 2026, 03:21
755,022
-2,312
13 Sept 2026, 09:19
757,334
-2,453
11 Sept 2026, 14:37
759,787
-2,316
9 Sept 2026, 02:15
762,103
-3,864
5 Sept 2026, 20:41
765,967
-2,385
3 Sept 2026, 21:16
768,352
-1,228
2 Sept 2026, 14:45
769,580
-1,446
1 Sept 2026, 11:55
771,026
-1,386
31 Aug 2026, 12:14
772,412
-1,547
30 Aug 2026, 10:37
773,959
-1,243
29 Aug 2026, 08:59
775,202
-868
28 Aug 2026, 11:34
776,070
-1,389
27 Aug 2026, 09:48
777,459
-535
26 Aug 2026, 08:42
777,994
-1,390
25 Aug 2026, 05:23
779,384
-1,306
24 Aug 2026, 02:29
780,690
-2,280
22 Aug 2026, 08:09
782,970
-1,645
20 Aug 2026, 21:46
784,615
-890
19 Aug 2026, 21:22
785,505
first reading
Engagement
613 posts held, back to 23 February 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 124 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.331%
avg views ÷ 752,830 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,490
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 613 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held
613 (23 February 2023 – 18 September 2026)
Views total
17,457
Reactions total
455
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Sept 2026, 17:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
302
Videos
67
Links
437
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2,297 reactions across 25 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
679
29.6%
🔥
585
25.5%
👍
364
15.8%
👏
129
5.62%
💯
87
3.79%
🎉
80
3.48%
🐳
53
2.31%
🤩
41
1.78%
❤🔥
39
1.70%
🏆
36
1.57%
🍾
33
1.44%
⚡
32
1.39%
🦄
20
0.871%
🤝
19
0.827%
🙏
18
0.784%
👌
15
0.653%
🆒
13
0.566%
✍
12
0.522%
😘
8
0.348%
😍
6
0.261%
12 further kinds
28
1.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 561 of the 613 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 496,811 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 613 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2023 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
52
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 561 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hipofinance. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 613 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 February 2023 to 18 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✅ Hipo Fund Investment Policy Statement: Ratified
Thanks to everyone who voted. The vote is now closed, and the IPS is the binding framework for how the Hipo Fund is managed.
Result
Yes: 7.8M HPO
No: 0 HPO
37 wallets voted
16% of eligible supply participated
What changes now
The Fund's signers are bound by the IPS. Any amendment, change to the value-return formula, reduction of the Fund's HPO position, or addition…
🗳 Vote now: Ratify the Hipo Fund Investment Policy Statement
Hipos, the IPS is now going to a DAO vote. HPO holders decide whether it becomes the binding framework for how the Hipo Fund is managed.
What you're voting on
• Target allocation, risk limits and rebalancing rules
• What the Fund can and cannot hold
• How assets are custodied — all in 2-of-3 multisigs
• How the Fund's value returns to HPO holders
• Quarte…
🔥 New Borrower Fee Mechanism: Buy & Burn HPO
One of the most interesting parts of Hipo’s smart contract is its permissionless validator selection.
Anyone can borrow staked GRAM from Hipo, participate as a validator, and return the GRAM + staking rewards after the validation round, keeping their committed validator fee.
We’ve now added a new borrower fee paid for each validation round.
Here’s what happens:
Validat…
💰 Hipo Fund Investment Policy Statement
Hipos, the Hipo Fund IPS draft is now published. This is the framework we propose to use to manage Hipo Fund. Before it goes to a DAO vote, we want your feedback.
What it covers:
• Target allocation, risk limits & rebalancing rules
• What the Fund can and cannot invest in, and why
• How assets are held and custodied
• How the Fund’s value can return to HPO holders
💬 Feedback…
🎉 Use your HPO and hGRAM freely across DeFi
From now on, Hipo Club counts your HPO and hGRAM balance whether it's in your wallet or being used in TON DEX LPs.
So if you provide liquidity to an hGRAM/HPO pool, the HPO in your LP position will count toward your Hipo Club balance.
That means you can:
• Earn DEX trading fees
• Keep your Hipo Club holding rate
• Avoid being downgraded just because your HPO is working i…
🔎 Hipo Verify & VS Pages Are Live
Hipos, we've added two new pages to the Hipo website:
🛡 hipo.finance/verify
The official list of Hipo wallet addresses, TON DNS names, Telegram accounts, and social profiles; Plus a clear list of things Hipo will never ask you to do.
If someone claims to be Hipo but isn't listed there, it's not us.
🔎 hipo.finance/vs
A simple comparison page showing:
• Our 0% protocol fee
• What t…
💰 Hipo Fund Report - August 2026
Hipos, the Hipo Fund report is updated. From here, we’re making the Fund a real priority.
📊 Where the Fund stands
• Value (Aug 24, 2026): $98,776.51
• Since Dec 2025: −10.91%
• Since launch: −58.4% (GRAM: −49.7%)
Balances barely changed this period and the decline was mainly price-driven.
This is our first report showing both since-inception performance and a benchmark. These will …
🚀 HPO Boosted Rewards now work with hGRAM in DEXs!
As suggested by the Hipo community, we’ve added a new feature that lets you keep earning HPO boosted rewards while using your hGRAM in DeFi.
If you provide liquidity to hGRAM/GRAM pools on DEX protocols like DeDust, STONfi, or Tonco, your hGRAM will still qualify for the same HPO boosted rewards as if you were holding it in your wallet.
From now on, when you put y…
🌟 The new Hipo website is live!
We’ve unified and redesigned the Hipo website, including HPO, App, Stats, and other pages, for a more consistent experience.
We’ve also updated the URL structure and optimized the website for the Telegram app to provide a smoother user experience.
Check it out and share your feedback → https://hipo.finance/
Buy HPO ││ Stake TON ││ Join Hipo Club ││ Follow Hipo ││ Watch & Learn ││ H…
🚀 New Stats are now live in Hipo App!
Transparency has always been one of Hipo’s priorities. We believe users should have easy access to the data behind the protocol and be able to track its performance for themselves.
That’s why we’ve added a dedicated Stats section to the Hipo app, bringing live protocol and market data together with historical performance in one place.
You can now quickly access key figures inc…
Showing the 12 most recent of 613 posts we hold for @hipofinance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
20
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
20
vacant every time we have ever looked
@hipofinance named 20 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@guitiqui named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@omimiverse named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@samgil_arts1 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@smilessmileyy named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@mahlex12 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@viptatinofresh named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@fayyyy_1 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@hipoholder named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@iamthedark named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@ajdiuegehdu named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@javierito17 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@jesustex named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@mobiiizations named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@teethighson named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@internetcatz named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@boomteckzone named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@covenant411 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@crypt0_sader named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@daviess named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@esty57 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
JVault @JVault · 31,215 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
DYOR.io community RU @dyorninjaru · 32,464 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 September 2026
DYOR.io community @dyorninja · 57,901 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
POVEL DUREV / TON memecoin @poveldurev · 289,796 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Faizan Haroon @faizanharoontelegram · 52,138 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
bemo | TON Staking | Liquid Staking | bmTON @bemofinance · 28,353 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
TON Hedge News @ton_hedge · 38,111 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Banger Crypto Call @solmemecll · 48,004 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
Ton Raffles En Channel @tonraffles_en · 1,235,136 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Gram 🇪🇸 @toncoin_es · 200,209 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto Universe @shivamcryptouniverse · 56,841 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Alpha Money @ismaalphamoney · 56,968 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto.kiran @cryptowithkiran · 37,264 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
СкуфиТОН @tonskuf · 118,894 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
teleintel @teleintel · 49,025 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Spy on Gems 🧐 with Mayank Dudeja @spyongems · 49,083 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
Toncoin 🇧🇷🇵🇹 @toncoin_pt · 53,550 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 August 2026
Crypto Sutra @cryptosutraofficial · 42,533 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
Crypto shubhrant Chaudhary @cryptoshubhrantchaudhary · 71,303 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Abhay Trading Live☝️ @abhaytrading · 96,019 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 August 2026
DAOLama NFT Lending @daolama · 127,957 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Gokul Chhabra | SEBI Registered RA @dilsetrader7 · 79,682 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
Crypto kanishk chaudhary public group🌍 @cryptokanishkchaudharypremium · 140,618 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Satoshi ₿ ꘜ TON @SatoshiNakamoTON · 52,670 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
17 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hipo” (@hipofinance), 752,830 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hipofinance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.