Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Хоккейный Бульбаш 🏒

Channel

Хоккейный Бульбаш 🏒

@hockey_bulbash

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,921subscribers

+1,467 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001285254679
TypeChannel
Username@hockey_bulbash
DescriptionАвторский телеграм-канал о самом важном в белорусском хоккее. Эксклюзивные инсайды, важные новости и аналитика. Попали в бан? Значит вели себя плохо. Для связи - @blbzvrr
Created13 December 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/hockey_bulbash

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,37712,55211,464.56 August 2026 — 10,454 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,447 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,437 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,430 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,432 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,426 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,414 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,406 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,401 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,411 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,416 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,410 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,406 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,397 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,416 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,403 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,391 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,392 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,377 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,657 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,707 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,985 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,084 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,067 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,202 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,382 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,552 subscribers7 September 2026 — 12,297 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,266 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,182 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,134 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,141 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,164 subscribers29 September 2026 — 12,079 subscribers5 October 2026 — 12,025 subscribers9 October 2026 — 12,016 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,985 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,971 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,963 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,956 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,954 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,959 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,932 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,934 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,933 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,910 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,982 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,984 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,987 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,005 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,985 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,972 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,967 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,966 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,940 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,918 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,912 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,921 subscribers11,9216 August 20265 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 91 days, net +1,467. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,051–12,878 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 01:0111,921+9
3 Nov 2026, 23:5011,912-6
3 Nov 2026, 03:0811,918-22
2 Nov 2026, 00:1711,940-26
1 Nov 2026, 00:1711,966-1
30 Oct 2026, 23:0611,967-5
29 Oct 2026, 22:3911,972-13
28 Oct 2026, 21:3011,985-20
27 Oct 2026, 23:5612,005+18
25 Oct 2026, 21:1011,987+3
25 Oct 2026, 00:3611,984+2
24 Oct 2026, 03:0511,982+72
23 Oct 2026, 02:4911,910-23
22 Oct 2026, 02:5111,933-1
20 Oct 2026, 21:0611,934+2
19 Oct 2026, 16:2711,932-27
18 Oct 2026, 17:4811,959+5
17 Oct 2026, 21:0011,954-2
16 Oct 2026, 23:3011,956-7
15 Oct 2026, 21:4411,963first reading

Engagement

82 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.7%
avg views ÷ 11,921 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,440
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
24
of 82 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held82 (23 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total130,670
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 19:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,150
Videos
≈1,340
Links
≈1,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 29s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 18:32 UTC≈2,090 viewsread 5 November 2026

Ноябрь начался для минчан болезненным поражением дома в игре с московским "Динамо". Дальше легче не будет, ведь восемь из оставшихся девяти игр будут сыграны на выезде. Семь из них против команд, которые идут в таблице выше. Есть ощущение, что в Минске начинают понимать, что ставка на Брылина могла быть ошибкой, но рубить с плеча никто не планирует. Предстоящий сложный месяц покажет, контролирует ли специалист коман…

5 Nov 2026, 07:36 UTC≈4,410 viewsread 5 November 2026

Если кто-то хочет видеть Эвандера Кейна в Минске, то не спешите радоваться. Вообще странно, что вы хотите его видеть. Проходили мы уже сбитых летчиков за 35 лет.

3 Nov 2026, 17:23 UTC≈3,500 viewsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @fonbetbyPhoto

🎁🎁🎁 На хоккей вместе с FONBET ❄️ Единственный оставшийся домашний матч в ноябре! Выиграй билеты на игру минского «Динамо» против «Авангарда» (10.11 / 19:10) ❤️ Что нужно сделать: ✅ Подпишись на каналы @fonbetby и @fanzone_by; ✅ Нажми на кнопку «Мне повезет!» под этим постом; ✅ Жди итоги. 🚨 9 ноября в 17:30 бот рандомно выберет победителя, который получит 2 билета на матч. Всем удачи 🏒 🏒 FONBET — титульный партн…

3 Nov 2026, 10:51 UTC≈4,930 viewsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @emelyanovdynamoVideo

❗️Как стало известно мне специально для «Чемпионата», московское «Динамо» приняло решение не оставлять без внимания провокационное поведение ведущего на «Минск Арене» во время последнего матча с минским «Динамо». Сегодня клуб отправил официальный запрос в КХЛ с просьбой рассмотреть сложившуюся ситуацию. Со своей стороны полностью поддерживаю клуб в его решении. Задача ведущего арены заключается в работе со своими бо…

2 Nov 2026, 19:16 UTC≈6,220 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Вот думаешь, летом списывал Спунера со счетов, чем может помочь романтик? А что сейчас?.. Райан в шутку предлагает приехать помочь, хотя на пенсии в Канаде дела у него хорошо.

2 Nov 2026, 17:24 UTC≈4,030 viewsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @nabanke_hockeyPhoto

⚡️ Серьезно вмешались в разбор прошедшей игровой недели! Данил Дыдко, Артем Демков и Роман Серафимович обсудили все самые яркие события белорусского хоккея: • Крис Хенкель и Стефан Да Коста – обсудили пополнение; • Большие проблемы атаки и реализации в Минске; • Результативность наших парней в КХЛ; • Интересные слухи о белорусах из НХЛ. ▶️ СМОТРИМ 🏒 На Банке | Хоккей

2 Nov 2026, 05:47 UTC≈5,430 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Видимо, имело смысл побегать два месяца. Переоценил Брылин «профессионалов»

1 Nov 2026, 16:34 UTC≈6,120 viewsread 5 November 2026

Сергей Брылин: "У нас серьезные проблемы. Лидеры уступают в скорости игры, принятии решения. Завтра выходной, но потом будем серьезно работать"

1 Nov 2026, 16:30 UTC≈6,270 viewsread 5 November 2026

Нужны какие-то меры в минском "Динамо". Команда в тупике и просвета не видно. Победы даются с трудом, через муки и страдания. Можно сколько угодно вспоминать Никонова, говорить что-то о подколках Аврамчика и так далее - это все около хоккея. С самой игрой проблемы большие. А какие меры? Как минимум движения среди помощников Брылина, список отказов. Слишком большая ставка сделана на Брылина, но пока очень тяжело дае…

1 Nov 2026, 15:42 UTC≈5,620 viewsread 5 November 2026

По опыту прошлого матч решил включить трансляцию сейчас. Что пропустил за первые два периода?

1 Nov 2026, 10:23 UTC≈5,740 viewsread 5 November 2026
Poll

Смогут ли минчане наконец победить москвичей?

  1. Да60%
  2. Нет28%
  3. 1 балл12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Nov 2026, 10:21 UTC≈5,550 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

❄ Динамовское дерби на «Минск-Арене» В Москве уже дважды в сезоне сильнее оказывалась московская команда. Кто победит в Минске? 🔝 Твоя ставка ◀ 🏒 FONBET — титульный партнер чемпионата КХЛ

Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @hockey_bulbash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Nov 2026, 10:23 UTCAnonymous Poll1,770 voters approx.

Смогут ли минчане наконец победить москвичей?

  1. Да60%
  2. Нет28%
  3. 1 балл12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jul 2026, 19:13 UTCAnonymous Poll2,030 voters approx.

77

  1. Стефан Да Коста54%
  2. Александр Китаров46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ХК Динамо Минск | HC Dinamo Minsk 🐂
@hcdinamoby · 84,594
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 August 2026
Хоккей Беларуси | Hockey.by
@hockeyby · 31,653
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 7 September 2026
ТРЕШОВЫЙ МИНСК 18+
@treshoviyminsk · 19,293
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 2 October 2026
Минск. Главное!
@minsk_gl · 214,768
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
Магнитогорск * Новости * Важное
@Magnitogorsk_vajnoe · 25,779
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 20 September 2026
Bel.Football — Белорусский Футбол
@belarus_football · 21,384
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 September 2026
5 элемент | 5element.by
@fivelementbelarus · 150,581
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 1 September 2026
sport5.by
@sport5by · 22,640
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 September 2026
Правый хват/Михаил Зислис
@Righthanded78 · 26,561
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 September 2026
МЛ ВИТЕБСК | ML VITEBSK
@fcmaxline_vtb · 22,237
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хоккейный Бульбаш 🏒” (@hockey_bulbash), 11,921 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hockey_bulbash.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.