Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
41 measurements spanning 72 days, net -3,841. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,733–26,734 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Oct 2026, 08:47
22,316
-9
17 Oct 2026, 11:14
22,325
-3
16 Oct 2026, 11:51
22,328
-6
15 Oct 2026, 14:50
22,334
-12
14 Oct 2026, 16:47
22,346
-11
13 Oct 2026, 04:26
22,357
-27
8 Oct 2026, 18:58
22,384
-26
4 Oct 2026, 10:56
22,410
-24
25 Sept 2026, 20:57
22,434
+124
19 Sept 2026, 04:21
22,310
-1,015
16 Sept 2026, 20:19
23,325
+731
14 Sept 2026, 19:36
22,594
-17
13 Sept 2026, 05:01
22,611
-1,964
11 Sept 2026, 05:39
24,575
-11
8 Sept 2026, 06:35
24,586
+32
5 Sept 2026, 04:36
24,554
-157
3 Sept 2026, 07:55
24,711
+5
2 Sept 2026, 01:09
24,706
+2
31 Aug 2026, 23:17
24,704
-3
30 Aug 2026, 23:53
24,707
first reading
Engagement
239 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.22%
avg views ÷ 22,316 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,060
79 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
79
of 239 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026
Posts held
239 (7 August 2026 – 12 October 2026)
Views total
162,502
Reactions total
7,383
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Oct 2026, 20:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
48m 13s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 87 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
20,724 reactions across 238 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5350741575288777382
8,545
41.2%
❤
3,994
19.3%
🔥
3,134
15.1%
🎉
1,302
6.28%
😁
706
3.41%
👏
458
2.21%
👍
405
1.95%
❤🔥
377
1.82%
custom 5240329399311570994
298
1.44%
🏆
261
1.26%
😎
259
1.25%
custom 5222398507851199882
244
1.18%
custom 5237752045271821813
171
0.825%
🙏
155
0.748%
custom 5240382923194017668
154
0.743%
custom 5240238131256532845
70
0.338%
🤝
47
0.227%
custom 5239975060214686131
35
0.169%
custom 5240051918654449552
32
0.154%
😘
30
0.145%
4 further kinds
47
0.227%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 238 of the 239 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,724 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 239 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💪 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
👏 1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣, да-да, ровно 💯 голов, как мы уже сообщали, забил «Макслайн» в Высшей лиге и намерен пополнить голевую копилку уже в ближайший четверг, когда сыграет на своём поле перенесенный матч 1️⃣6️⃣-го тура против жодинского «Торпедо-БЕЛАЗ». Нам нужна только победа, «жёлто-зелёные»!
📆 1️⃣5️⃣ октября снова собираемся на витебском ЦСК по проспекту Генерала Людникова, 12, чтобы поддержать команду, котор…
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
⚽️ Артём Концевой признан лучшим игроком 24-го тура Высшей лиги, а его первый гол в ворота «Гомеля» признан самым красивым голом в этом же туре по версии АБФФ.
😎 - Поздравляем!
💚💛 Продолжай в том же духе, Артём!
🎉🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
📸 Фоточки из Гомеля спешат в ваши аккаунты в социальных сетях и галереи. Разбираем.
➡️ Фотогалерея матча «Гомель» - «Макслайн» в официальной группе ВКонтакте
💚💛 Вперёд, «Макслайн»!
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
⚽️🎉 Футбол мы любим за эмоции, а уж когда они победные, так это вообще шик. Ловите первые мгновения после финального свистка в Гомеле и не стесняйтесь ставить огоньки🔥🔥🔥.
💚💛 В 5:1-й раз с победой, «Макслайн»!
1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣
🏆🎩 Доброго понедельника, лидеры пелотона! Вчерашний гол в исполнении Марка Буланова стал юбилейным, сотым мячом «Макслайна» в Высшей лиге. Похоже, знал, когда праздновал. 🎉
⚽️ - Заходим на вторую сотню!
💚💛 Вперёд, «Макслайн»!
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
⚽️⚽️ Приближаясь к насыщенной игровой неделе с двумя (🔤) домашними матчами, ещё раз заценим голешники наших ребят, которые сегодня выходили на любой вкус и цвет.
📺 Обзор матча «Гомель» - «Макслайн»
⚽️ Лучший гол матча по вашему мнению:
😎 - Артём Концевой в дальнюю девять
⚽️ - Он же в домик голкиперу хозяев
😎 - Клео в дальний с левой
😎 - Раскат Грома с небольшим рикошетом
🎉 - Була Луис Назариу да Лима …
🏆 АРТЁМ КОНЦЕВОЙ — ЛУЧШИЙ ИГРОК МАТЧА
⚽️⚽️ Возможно, не все из вас успели подключиться к трансляции, когда счёт на табло усилиями Артёма Концевого стал 2️⃣➖0️⃣ уже к 5-й минуте. Лихое начало деморализовало соперника, а нашей команде придало куража и уверенности в том, что всё будет хорошо. Так, собственно, и вышло, а мы чествуем нашего Тёму, который отныне — лучший бомбардир команды в этом сезоне Высшей лиги с 8️⃣ г…
🎉 МАРК ПРОДОЛЖАЕТ
🔥 - Накидаем огоньков нашему Мистеру-зажигалке🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
💚💛 Вперёд, «Макслайн»!
🔥128❤🔥12🎉4👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 239 posts we hold for @fcmaxline_vtb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fcmaxline_vtb edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Maxline Casino @maxline_casino · 21,762 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 September 2026
Витебск. Главное! @vitebsk · 42,939 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 28 August 2026
ЧП | Витебск @chp_vitebsk · 52,663 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 24 August 2026
ZatestilVitebsk - СКИДКИ, НОВОСТИ 🔝 ВИТЕБСК @zatestilvitebsk · 24,812 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 18 September 2026
Bel.Football — Белорусский Футбол @belarus_football · 21,192 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 September 2026
sport5.by @sport5by · 22,950 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МЛ ВИТЕБСК | ML VITEBSK” (@fcmaxline_vtb), 22,316 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fcmaxline_vtb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.