Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for МЛ ВИТЕБСК | ML VITEBSK

Channel

МЛ ВИТЕБСК | ML VITEBSK

@fcmaxline_vtb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

24,706subscribers

-1,451 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001308183575
TypeChannel
Username@fcmaxline_vtb
DescriptionОфициальный канал футбольного клуба МЛ Витебск. Получай эксклюзивную информацию о клубе раньше всех! Inst: https://www.instagram.com/fcmaxline_vtb/ ВК: https://vk.com/fcmaxline_vtb YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@fcmaxline_vtb
Created17 April 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fcmaxline_vtb

Growth

24,70426,15725,430.57 August 2026 — 26,157 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,234 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,190 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,145 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,110 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,041 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,996 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,028 subscribers16 August 2026 — 24,961 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,877 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,827 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,843 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,819 subscribers22 August 2026 — 24,782 subscribers24 August 2026 — 24,813 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,760 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,740 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,727 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24,731 subscribers29 August 2026 — 24,713 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,708 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,707 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24,704 subscribers2 September 2026 — 24,706 subscribers24,7067 August 20262 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 26 days, net -1,451. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,486–26,375 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 01:0924,706+2
31 Aug 2026, 23:1724,704-3
30 Aug 2026, 23:5324,707-1
30 Aug 2026, 00:3424,708-5
29 Aug 2026, 03:4724,713-18
28 Aug 2026, 00:5424,731+4
27 Aug 2026, 03:2324,727-13
26 Aug 2026, 01:1324,740-20
25 Aug 2026, 04:2524,760-53
24 Aug 2026, 00:3624,813+31
22 Aug 2026, 07:2824,782-37
20 Aug 2026, 19:3824,819-24
19 Aug 2026, 17:1724,843+16
18 Aug 2026, 16:1224,827-50
17 Aug 2026, 12:5424,877-84
16 Aug 2026, 07:4324,961-67
14 Aug 2026, 20:0625,028+32
13 Aug 2026, 09:4824,996-45
12 Aug 2026, 08:1225,041-69
11 Aug 2026, 04:5125,110first reading

Engagement

158 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.13%
avg views ÷ 24,706 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,010
158 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
158
of 158 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 157 of 158 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held158 (7 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total317,382
Reactions total13,248
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 22:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,760
Videos
2,570
Links
858

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
39m 42s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 52 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13,248 reactions across 157 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53507415752887773826,06745.8%
2,75720.8%
🔥1,74213.1%
🎉8516.42%
😁6324.77%
❤‍🔥2812.12%
👍2331.76%
🏆1621.22%
😎1491.12%
🙏1481.12%
👏1411.06%
🤝390.294%
😘260.196%
custom 5240382923194017668160.121%
custom 523822828413050267130.023%
custom 524032939931157099410.008%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 157 of the 158 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,248 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 158 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 18:30 UTC≈1,320 views59 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @vitebsk_priut_maxlaiVideo

Video, posted without a caption

33🙏17👍7👏1🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 18:30 UTC≈1,320 views78 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @vitebsk_priut_maxlaiPhoto

На матче «МЛ Витебск» сегодня произошло нечто замечательное! 🎉 Во время мероприятия мы провели акцию по поиску новых семей для наших пушистых друзей, и результаты не могут не радовать. Два щенка и котенок нашли своих новых хозяев, которые уже полны любви и заботы для них. 🐶❤️🐱 Эта акция стала возможной благодаря поддержке МЛ Витебск💚💛 Мы искренне благодарим всех, кто пришел на матч и помог в поиске новых домиков дл

60👏13❤‍🔥3👍2

2 Sept 2026, 18:26 UTC≈1,380 views49 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🎤ПОСТАРАЕМСЯ РЕАБИЛИТИРОВАТЬСЯ ⚽️⚽️ Немало интересного поведал Филипп Александрович в своём интервью по итогам матча. Стоит послушать 💯! ❤️ - И, конечно, забацать сердце тренеру, который готов ответить на все вопросы, даже если счёт на табло не в нашу пользу. 💚💛 Вперёд, «Макслайн»!

29😁10custom 52403829231940176686custom 52382282841305026713custom 53507415752887773821

2 Sept 2026, 17:28 UTC≈1,720 views43 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

30😁6custom 53507415752887773825🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 17:24 UTC≈1,760 views66 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤, 🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤 Очередная домашняя ничья. Юбилейная, пятая… ⚽️⚽️1️⃣➖1️⃣ (Диабате) 💚💛 Вперёд, «Макслайн»!

custom 535074157528877738240😁184🏆2👏2

2 Sept 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,650 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

⚽️⚽️1️⃣➖1️⃣ 8️⃣1️⃣ Кипер гостей спасает дважды. Нет слов, одни буквы. 💚💛 Вперёд, «Макслайн»!

custom 5350741575288777382152🔥2😁2

2 Sept 2026, 17:09 UTC≈1,570 views27 reactionsread 2 September 2026

⚽️⚽️1️⃣➖1️⃣ 8️⃣0️⃣ Була в здании, Басс заменен. 10 минут у шумилинской легенды на всё про всё. Верим! 💚💛 Вперёд, «Макслайн»!

🔥17custom 535074157528877738263❤‍🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC≈1,540 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

⚽️⚽️1️⃣➖1️⃣ 7️⃣7️⃣ Пытаемся взломать оборону соперника. Снова выше. 💚💛 Вперёд, «Макслайн»!

😁96custom 53507415752887773823🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 16:53 UTC≈1,500 views23 reactionsread 2 September 2026

⚽️⚽️1️⃣➖1️⃣ 6️⃣3️⃣ Тройная. Баланович, Гнака и Клеонизе поле покинули, вместо них уже рвут и мечут Жук, Босич и Месарович. 💚💛 Вперёд, «Макслайн»!

15custom 52403829231940176685🔥2🎉1

2 Sept 2026, 16:49 UTC≈1,520 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

⚽️⚽️1️⃣➖1️⃣ 5️⃣1️⃣ Момент Диабате и последующий угловой. Снова мимо, но хоть Админтер принял участие в игре и чуть не упал на скользкой дорожке. Интересно, дал бы реф провести замену? 💚💛 Вперёд, «Макслайн»!

18😁3custom 53507415752887773822custom 52403829231940176681

2 Sept 2026, 16:43 UTC≈1,480 views35 reactionsread 2 September 2026

⚽️⚽️1️⃣➖1️⃣ 5️⃣4️⃣ От двух штанг. Без шансов для Паши. По одному у нас. 💚💛 Вперёд, «Макслайн»!

custom 5350741575288777382215custom 52403829231940176684🔥2😁2custom 52403293993115709941

2 Sept 2026, 16:37 UTC≈1,490 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

⚽️⚽️1️⃣➖0️⃣ 4️⃣7️⃣ Ээээх, Захару бы… 💚💛 Вперёд, «Макслайн»!

14🔥2🎉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 158 posts we hold for @fcmaxline_vtb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@fcmaxline_vtb edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 5,056 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Витебск. Главное!
@vitebsk · 43,154
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 28 August 2026
ЧП | Витебск
@chp_vitebsk · 52,724
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q281780 on Wikidata, read 30 August 2026
LabelFC Maxline Viciebsk
DescriptionBelarusian association football club
YouTubeUCm0J0j4acV7dNjiWgMJm_SA
Official sitehttps://fcml.by/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“МЛ ВИТЕБСК | ML VITEBSK” (@fcmaxline_vtb), 24,706 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fcmaxline_vtb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.