Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for На Банке | Футбол

Channel

На Банке | Футбол

@nabankelive

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,837subscribers

-138 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001919050029
TypeChannel
Username@nabankelive
Created2 June 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nabankelive

Growth

6,7796,9756,8776 August 2026 — 6,975 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,975 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,960 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,947 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,924 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,919 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,900 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,862 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,837 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,826 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,804 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,779 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,837 subscribers6,8376 August 20269 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 34 days, net -138. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,750–7,004 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 09:186,837+58
3 Sept 2026, 23:586,779-25
31 Aug 2026, 09:456,804-22
28 Aug 2026, 10:346,826-11
25 Aug 2026, 15:136,837-25
22 Aug 2026, 18:066,862-38
19 Aug 2026, 01:166,900-19
16 Aug 2026, 02:236,919-5
12 Aug 2026, 19:436,924-23
9 Aug 2026, 12:016,947-13
6 Aug 2026, 21:126,960-15
6 Aug 2026, 03:176,975no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:056,975first reading

Engagement

97 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.8%
avg views ÷ 6,837 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,590
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 97 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held97 (2 August 202619 August 2026)
Views total67,230
Reactions total1,292
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 47s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,502 reactions across 81 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
94020.9%
🔥84218.7%
custom 535520875359348333760013.3%
custom 53551424693632046193828.49%
😁2224.93%
👍2134.73%
👎1964.35%
🤣1663.69%
1593.53%
🤬1012.24%
😭912.02%
🕊731.62%
🎃611.35%
😢591.31%
💯410.911%
🤯410.911%
🍓400.888%
👏330.733%
🤝330.733%
🐳270.6%
20 further kinds1824.04%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 97 of the 97 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,470 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 97 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈1,460 views45 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🦆 «МЛ Витебск» обыграл «Барановичи» в родных стенах. «Букмекеры» вернулись на первую строчку таблицы как минимум до завтра. ❤️ На Банке | Футбол

24👎16👍2😁2🍓1

19 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC≈1,710 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

🤨 После просмотра этого видео у вас будет лишь один вопрос: почему Егор Филипенко сыграл в 17 раз больше матчей за сборную, чем Дмитрий Бага? Победу в челлендже Дима посвятил Мише Горнаку, который недавно получил от Егора. 😵‍💫 ВЫ ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО ДОЛЖНЫ ПОСМОТРЕТЬ НОВУЮ «БРОВКУ»

🍓86🔥3😁1

19 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC≈1,810 views24 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

🕵️ Дима Бага и Егор Филипенко провели «инспекцию» поля в Могилеве после скандала между болельщиками «Днепра» и Станиславом Суворовым. Какой стадион проверить следующим? ☁️ 🖥️ Выпуск с финала Женского Кубка Беларуси

12🔥7🏆4🍓1

19 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈1,920 views48 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

😥 Как был упущен один из самых реальных шансов на топ-турнир для сборной Беларуси. Иван Маевский вспомнил матч в плей-офф Лиги наций в 2020 году. 🔥 – мы еще свое возьмем ❌ – больше такого шанса не будет 🖥️ Интереснейший подкаст по карьере Маевского

🔥28custom 5355208753593483337163🍓1

19 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC≈1,940 views137 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🏅 Сегодня состоится один перенесенный матч 18 тура высшей лиги. «МЛ Витебск» дома примет «Барановичи». Как думаете, кто кого? 🔥 – «букмекеры» 🤝 – жду ничью ❤️ – за «Барановичи» ❤️ Бонус от наших друзей для уверенных

90🔥42🤝4🙏1

19 Aug 2026, 04:10 UTC≈1,970 views42 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

💬 «Есть люди, которые основывали фанатское движение в Могилеве тогда, когда Суворов еще не родился. Конечно, их его слова зацепили» В свежем выпуске «На Бровке» пообщались с болельщиком могилевского «Днепра» о недавних событиях в клубе. Как думаете, улучшатся ли результаты могилевчан при новом главном тренер? ❤️ – станет лучше ❌ – как было, так и останется ➡️ Смотрите весь выпуск здесь

custom 53552087535934833372018🤡4

18 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈2,000 views30 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Мужской футбол ☺️Женский футбол Дима Бага узнал у обладательницы Кубка Беларуси Лианы Мирошниченко, как празднуют победы в женском футболе, а еще поделился годным лайфхаком. ⚽️ Познавательный выпуск «На Бровке» ждет вас

13😁11🥴4🍓2

18 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈2,070 views36 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

🇩🇪 Каково это, играть против Тони Крооса? Иван Маевский в подкасте «На Банке» вспомнил, как противостоял одному из лучших полузащитников в истории футбола. 😁 – если бы налегке закрыл этого немца 📷 Интереснейший подкаст по карьере Маевского

😁275💯3🍓1

18 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈2,120 views72 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🇪🇺💚 Подвели итоги выступления белорусских клубов в еврокубках. 🤓 Никита Лычев: Выступление наших клубов оставляет надежду, что у нас все-таки минимальное развитие футбола есть. Понемножку мы выбираемся из ситуации, когда после 2020-2021 годов казалось, что футбол уже упал ниже некуда. 🥖 Дима Бага: Радует, что ближайшие два года в еврокубках будут играть четыре команды. Довольно неплохой евросезон. Хотелось бы кого-

👍5115custom 53552087535934833376

18 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈9,460 views31 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

⚡️ Свежайший «На бровке» уже на канале! 🥖⚽️ Дмитрий Бага и Егор Филипенко в это воскресенье посетили прекрасный город Могилёв, где проходил FONBET Финал Женского Кубка Беларуси по футболу. Атмосфера матча, комментарии футболисток и одного легендарного для белфутбола нападающего, победные эмоции победительниц и жизнь футбольного Могилёва – в новом выпуске. ПРИЯТНОГО ПРОСМОТРА! ▶️ ❤️ На Банке | Футбол

🔥1410🍓6😁1

18 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC≈2,060 views34 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

💙 Чего не хватило минскому «Динамо» в ответке с «Брагой»? Отвечает Никита Лычев: «Динамо» не хватило фактурного нападающего, которого можно выпустить в концовке, позагружать, чтоб он поборолся, поскидывал мячи. Ни Гвет, ни Варданян, ни Джиме на эту роль не тянут. А Луцкович еще слишком молод, не оброс мясом, ему сложно было бороться с игроками «Браги». 🖥️ Смотрим еврокубковые «Разборы»

17💯10🤔5🤡2

18 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC≈2,110 views76 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Ведущие «Разборов» высказались о дебютной еврокампании «МЛ Витебск». ⚽️ Егор Филипенко: Если ты ставишь задачу выходить в еврокубки, то тот соперник, который был у «МЛ», должны были проходить. Но для первого раза, я бы даже сказал, хорошо. Они набираются опыта. Уверен, что если будет поспокойнее со сменами тренеров, сохранится бюджет, костяк команды, точечно усилятся, то в следующем сезоне могут выступить лучше в ев

👎3629🤔6🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 97 posts we hold for @nabankelive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTCFinal Results427 voters

⚡️ Сложнейший опрос: кто придет в студию «На Банке»?

  1. Кот15%
  2. Лис27%
  3. Медведь7%
  4. Волк5%
  5. Заяц12%
  6. Орел3%
  7. Сокол30%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTCAnonymous Poll515 voters

Верите в камбэки наших клубов во втором тайме?

  1. 💙 «Динамо» сможет33%
  2. 🦆 верю в «МЛ»28%
  3. ❌ и там и там проигрыш52%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 97 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“На Банке | Футбол” (@nabankelive), 6,837 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nabankelive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.