Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
55 measurements spanning 91 days, net -401. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,012–27,533 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 13:39
27,072
-5
5 Nov 2026, 10:50
27,077
-3
4 Nov 2026, 07:10
27,080
+4
3 Nov 2026, 05:40
27,076
+3
2 Nov 2026, 07:36
27,073
-3
1 Nov 2026, 08:48
27,076
-7
31 Oct 2026, 08:40
27,083
-8
30 Oct 2026, 10:19
27,091
-8
29 Oct 2026, 11:16
27,099
+2
28 Oct 2026, 13:08
27,097
+3
27 Oct 2026, 15:06
27,094
-6
26 Oct 2026, 12:36
27,100
-5
25 Oct 2026, 14:14
27,105
-1
24 Oct 2026, 14:26
27,106
-7
23 Oct 2026, 15:56
27,113
+2
22 Oct 2026, 13:35
27,111
-5
21 Oct 2026, 04:19
27,116
-10
19 Oct 2026, 01:59
27,126
-6
18 Oct 2026, 01:20
27,132
-3
17 Oct 2026, 04:01
27,135
first reading
Engagement
96 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 141 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.76%
avg views ÷ 27,072 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,830
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.985%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 96 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
96 (6 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
49,382
Reactions total
473
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 16:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,240
Videos
≈4
Links
≈1,740
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 21s
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,928 reactions across 94 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
997
51.7%
👍
421
21.8%
🔥
264
13.7%
😍
195
10.1%
🍓
11
0.571%
🤩
11
0.571%
❤🔥
10
0.519%
💘
9
0.467%
🤔
5
0.259%
🥴
2
0.104%
😈
1
0.052%
😱
1
0.052%
🤯
1
0.052%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 94 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,928 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
18.8%
18 of 96 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
18
posts carrying an erid · 18 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,580
over 18 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,670
over 78 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjdTm4Rq
1
13 August 2026
13 August 2026
2SDnjdVYCnw
1
31 August 2026
31 August 2026
2SDnjeQrNq1
1
17 August 2026
17 August 2026
2SDnjf479EU
1
4 November 2026
4 November 2026
2VfnxvPfX1W
1
30 September 2026
30 September 2026
2VfnxyXofBS
1
30 October 2026
30 October 2026
2VtzqxZQ1TA
1
24 September 2026
24 September 2026
5jtCeReNx12oajzgzJynHJp
1
15 August 2026
15 August 2026
5jtCeReNx12oajzgzemHhoE
1
19 August 2026
19 August 2026
5jtCeReNx12oajzhVRLrNe7
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
5jtCeReNx12oak2qVE3m5C7
1
23 September 2026
23 September 2026
5jtCeReNx12oak2qyzjEh2F
1
1 October 2026
1 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 6 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (3.70%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Настенный светильник Bogates Cappio – это стильное и функциональное бра, которое станет отличным дополнением к интерьеру вашего дома. Каждый элемент светильника плавно перетекает в следующий, создавая волшебные переливы света, которые превратят помещение в настоящую палитру эмоций.
Ссылка
Красивые мебельные решения заслуживают внимания 🤍
Авито проводит премию «Мебель года 2026», объединяющую производителей, дизайнеров и мастеров. Жюри уже сформировало шорт-лист, а теперь каждый может оценить работы и поддержать фаворитов, претендующих на награду «Выбор народа».
Голосование продлится до 12 ноября. А за оценку всех проектов предусмотрен приятный бонус — возможность выиграть 100 000 рублей в розыгрыше.…
Сервировочная доска Alvig сделана из натурального мрамора. Ее можно использовать для подачи выпечки, нарезок, канапе или свежих фруктов. Мрамор хорошо держит холод — блюда на такой доске дольше остаются прохладными.
Ссылка
DINO — ассиметричные журнальные столы в современном стиле с изогнутыми столешницами и плавными формами. Они могут быть центром гостиной, местом для вечерних чаепитий и уютных посиделок с книгой.
Ссылка
Знакомьтесь, наши новые табуреты Бадди и Мила 🤍
Бадди выполнен из массива дуба. Его можно оставить в натуральном оттенке дерева или выкрасить в эмаль любого цвета.
Мила – лаконичная модель с сиденьем из массива дуба и металлическими ножками.
Обе модели станут стильным акцентом в интерьере и легко найдут своё место в вашем доме.
Посмотреть модели можно у lagomhome.ru
Какой милый набор декоративных ваз «Nature». Их можно использовать как единую композицию, а можно и расставить отдельно по разным комнатам, при этом сохранив общую декоративную концепцию.
Ссылка
Сколько на самом деле стоит кухня в Москве?
Кухня 4 метра, эмаль и Egger, фурнитура, доставка и монтаж: 540 000 ₽.
Такие цифры мебельщики почти не публикуют. Говорят «от 35 тысяч за метр», а настоящую цену вы слышите в лучшем случае после замера.
Игорь, владелец фабрики «Кухнев», открыто выкладывает сметы в [своём канале]. Своё производство в Москве с 2013 года, скрывать нечего.
🎁 А до 31 октября обратившимся за…
😃 Новый выпуск на канале Циана
Мы заглянем в гости к Карине Мурашкиной в ее квартиру Тверском районе, которую она снимает уже второй год. Здесь у каждой вещи есть своя история: от обуви, которая занимает почти всю прихожую, до подарков, картин и необычных арт-объектов, которые Карине дарили друзья, мама и любимые подписчики. Карина открывает для нас не только шкафы и полки, но и неожиданные подробности о себе.
🤩 Пе…
Изящная и стильная банкетка из массива березы.
Она отлично впишется в современную прихожую, ведь её лаконичный вид подходит практически к любому интерьеру.
Ссылка
❤8👍6😍5🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @homepinterest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @homepinterest as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
27 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
27 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Интерьерная копилка @interior_collection · 59,579 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 22 August 2026
Домашняя барахляндия @homelyandiya · 27,575 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 September 2026
Zimanzóne @zimanzone · 53,218 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
eat.sleep.wear. @eatsleepwear · 86,980 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 17 August 2026
HOMEASY - идеи для дома @homeasy · 181,724 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
SKDESIGN • Дизайнерская мебель @skdesigntg · 25,225 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 September 2026
INMYROOM @inmyroom · 70,813 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Тренды и Дизайн @trenddesign · 43,214 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 28 August 2026
Дизигн интерьера @desingokey · 34,709 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
Я В ДОМИКЕ @uyut_house · 23,816 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 September 2026
DOMEO. ДИЗАЙН | РЕМОНТ | НЕДВИЖИМОСТЬ @domeoru · 511,409 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 10 August 2026
Интерьерные хроники @home_where · 27,518 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 September 2026
yana_vanilla @ya_na_vanilla · 30,487 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
Дизайн на максималках! @dom_designe · 68,505 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 August 2026
Дизайн и ремонт | Интерьерные решения @decor_journal · 273,168 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
Магия уютного дома @thehomeest · 32,771 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 4 September 2026
divan.ru @officialdivanru · 61,262 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 August 2026
Интерьеры загородных домов @cottage_blog · 69,850 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026
Ирина | Зауютить 🕯 @casacozy · 30,608 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 6 September 2026
Эстетика для дома 🧺 Светлана | находки | обзоры | wildberries @estetica_home · 32,821 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 8 September 2026
Современный дачник @dacha_blog · 109,644 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
Идеи Вашего Дома @ivd_ru · 34,890 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
Дом со Вкусом | Дизайн интерьера | 2026 @sweethometop · 18,733 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 5 October 2026
Zlaatataa-design @zlatadesigne · 21,782 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pinterest у меня дома” (@homepinterest), 27,072 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/homepinterest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.