Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
50 measurements spanning 92 days, net -147. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,073–15,266 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 50
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 02:36
15,097
+2
5 Nov 2026, 03:09
15,095
-4
4 Nov 2026, 03:05
15,099
-2
3 Nov 2026, 06:06
15,101
-3
2 Nov 2026, 07:05
15,104
-2
1 Nov 2026, 06:57
15,106
-2
31 Oct 2026, 07:28
15,108
-3
26 Oct 2026, 05:30
15,111
-1
25 Oct 2026, 08:34
15,112
-1
24 Oct 2026, 09:58
15,113
-3
23 Oct 2026, 08:09
15,116
+2
22 Oct 2026, 09:20
15,114
-5
20 Oct 2026, 23:55
15,119
-2
19 Oct 2026, 21:45
15,121
-3
18 Oct 2026, 18:17
15,124
-3
17 Oct 2026, 16:57
15,127
+1
16 Oct 2026, 16:06
15,126
-1
15 Oct 2026, 19:41
15,127
-1
13 Oct 2026, 04:00
15,128
-13
8 Oct 2026, 19:56
15,141
first reading
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 5 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.76%
avg views ÷ 15,097 subscribers
Avg views / post
870
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.386%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026
Posts held
37 (5 November 2025 – 28 October 2026)
Views total
13,051
Reactions total
16
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
342 reactions across 26 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
145
42.4%
👍
108
31.6%
👏
24
7.02%
🙏
16
4.68%
😢
15
4.39%
👌
11
3.22%
💔
9
2.63%
👎
7
2.05%
🕊
6
1.75%
🔥
1
0.292%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 342 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2025 to 28 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
◀️ تا حالا شده برای انجام کاری به کمک کسی نیاز داشته باشی، اما ندونی به چه کسی میشه اعتماد کرد؟
مثلاً برای پیگیری یک کار اداری، بررسی یک ملک یا محل، خرید و تحویل یک وسیله، انجام یک کار تخصصی یا کاری که در شهر دیگری داری؟
گاهی مسئله فقط پیدا کردن یک نفر نیست؛ مهم اینه که کار درست انجام بشه، بشه به نتیجه اعتماد کرد و اگر مشکلی پیش اومد، راهی برای پیگیری وجود داشته باشه.
ما در حال بررسی این موضوع هستیم که مردم در چن…
اولین ضربه؛ وقتی بینظمی عادی میشود!
در سال ۱۹۶۹، فیلیپ زیمباردو، روانشناس آمریکایی، آزمایشی مشهور انجام داد. او دو خودروی مشابه را در دو منطقه متفاوت رها کرد؛ یکی در برانکس نیویورک، منطقهای کمبرخوردار، و دیگری در پالو آلتو، منطقهای مرفه در کالیفرنیا.
نتیجه در ابتدا بسیار متفاوت بود. خودروی برانکس خیلی زود مورد دستبرد و تخریب قرار گرفت؛ قطعاتی از آن جدا شد و بدنهاش آسیب دید. اما خودروی پالو آلتو ساعتها و ح…
برای یک بازدید ساده در محل، همراه با چند عکس و گزارش کوتاه، چه مبلغی حاضر هستید پرداخت کنید؟
هزینههای جانبی مانند حملونقل یا خرید کالا جداگانه محاسبه میشوند.
کمتر از ۲۰۰ هزار تومان9%
۲۰۰ تا ۵۰۰ هزار تومان14%
۵۰۰ هزار تا ۱ میلیون تومان15%
۱ تا ۳ میلیون تومان12%
بیش از ۳ میلیون تومان3%
مبلغ به نوع کار بستگی دارد.39%
برای چنین خدمتی پول پرداخت نمیکنم.8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
اگر پلتفرمی وجود داشته باشد که فرد مناسب را برای انجام کار پیدا کند و گزارش یا مدرک انجام آن را در اختیارتان بگذارد، چقدر احتمال دارد از آن استفاده کنید؟
قطعاً استفاده میکنم.19%
احتمالاً استفاده میکنم.20%
به نوع کار و هزینه بستگی دارد.54%
احتمالاً استفاده نمیکنم.5%
اصلاً استفاده نمیکنم.1%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدام نوع کار را بیشتر ترجیح میدهید به فرد دیگری بسپارید؟
بازدید از ملک، پروژه یا محل اجرای کار5%
بررسی کالا یا پیگیری خرید9%
پیگیری اداری و تحویل یا دریافت مدارک33%
حضور در جلسه یا رویداد به نمایندگی از من9%
تعمیرات یا خدمات منزل35%
جمعآوری اطلاعات و انجام تحقیقات میدانی32%
انجام کار تخصصی توسط فرد واجد مهارت56%
هیچکدام2%
The shares total 181%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
اگر کاری داشته باشید که باید در شهری دیگر انجام شود، معمولاً چه میکنید؟
از دوستان یا اعضای خانواده کمک میگیرم.37%
در شبکههای اجتماعی دنبال فرد مناسب میگردم.9%
از سایت یا اپلیکیشن تخصصی استفاده میکنم.15%
خودم به آن شهر میروم.30%
کار را به تعویق میاندازم یا از انجامش صرفنظر میکنم.10%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @honaremodiriat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @honaremodiriat as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
31 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
31 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
34 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
برای یک بازدید ساده در محل، همراه با چند عکس و گزارش کوتاه، چه مبلغی حاضر هستید پرداخت کنید؟
هزینههای جانبی مانند حملونقل یا خرید کالا جداگانه محاسبه میشوند.
کمتر از ۲۰۰ هزار تومان9%
۲۰۰ تا ۵۰۰ هزار تومان14%
۵۰۰ هزار تا ۱ میلیون تومان15%
۱ تا ۳ میلیون تومان12%
بیش از ۳ میلیون تومان3%
مبلغ به نوع کار بستگی دارد.39%
برای چنین خدمتی پول پرداخت نمیکنم.8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2025 to 28 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کانال ذهن موفق @zehnemovaffagh · 23,436 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 18 September 2026
آکادمی مدیریت @pmacademy · 30,472 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 September 2026
مدیریت رفتار سازمانی @organizationalbehavior · 31,747 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
ترفند مدیریت @tarfandemodiriat · 104,364 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
مدیران ایران | آموزش مدیریت کسب وکار |modiriran 🕊 @modiriran · 34,431 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هنر مدیریت” (@honaremodiriat), 15,097 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/honaremodiriat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.