TGE?!
👍1

Channel
@honeyoftoday
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,034subscribers
-205 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001862039956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @honeyoftoday |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/honeyoftoday |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:50 | 6,034 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:07 | 6,037 | -7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:21 | 6,044 | -4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:11 | 6,048 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:51 | 6,054 | -4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 6,058 | -20 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 07:05 | 6,078 | -12 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 04:30 | 6,090 | -11 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 12:30 | 6,101 | -25 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 09:57 | 6,126 | -12 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 6,138 | -22 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 6,160 | -14 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:40 | 6,174 | -7 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:35 | 6,181 | -9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 6,190 | -19 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 6,209 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 6,217 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 6,225 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 6,236 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 6,233 | first reading |
80 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 80 (6 August 2026 – 2 November 2026) |
| Views total | 11,602 |
| Reactions total | 105 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 17:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
942 reactions across 79 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 385 | 40.9% | |
| 👍 | 218 | 23.1% | |
| ❤ | 177 | 18.8% | |
| 🤩 | 53 | 5.63% | |
| 👎 | 19 | 2.02% | |
| 🤝 | 19 | 2.02% | |
| 😱 | 14 | 1.49% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 1.06% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 1.06% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 0.955% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 0.849% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 0.425% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 0.318% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 0.318% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 0.318% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.106% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.106% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.106% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.106% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.106% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.212% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 942 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (21.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
TGE?!
👍1
비상 비상 비상
👏5👍1
스테이킹 사이트에서 언스테이킹 및 리워드 클레임 하시고 브릿지 사이트에서 $BILL - ETH 브릿지 하시면 됩니다. 브릿지 시간은 좀 걸림. TGE 대비 -80% 이상 떨어졌지만 공짜 파밍이었으니 이정도면 쏘쏘인듯? 🤪
❤4
✅ Billions $BILL 클레임 준비하기 오늘 오후 5시 33분부터 빌리언즈 $BILL 토큰 에어드롭 클레임 시작됩니다. 시간 겁나 빠르네요. 벌써 6개월이 지났다니.. 현재 $BILL 가격은 약 0.0055달러로 만개당 약 $55 정도 입니다. 세탁은 진즉에 끝났지만 클레임 열리면 더 떨어질 예정 😂 🌐 https://staking.billions.network/
❤2👏2😭2
✅ 이번 바이낸스 해킹이 소름돋는 이유 최근 세계 최대 암호화폐 거래소 바이낸스에서 대규모 해킹 사태가 발생했습니다. 6.3B 규모로역대 바이비트 때보다 몇배나 큰 규모임. 규모가 가장 크고 신뢰할만한 1티어 거래소인 만큼 저도 대부분의 암호화폐 시드를 보관하고 있는 거래소 이기도 했습니다. 근데 갑자기 지난 10월 8일, 모바일로 VIP 채팅 알람이 옴. 뭔가 싶어 살펴보니 누군가 본인 계정으로 VIP 고객 서비스에 채팅을 전송함. 바이낸스 VIP 서비스는 일반 사용자보다 대기 시간이 짧고 24/7 우선 지원을 받을 수 있음. 2FA를 초기화 하려고 한걸까? 본인은 바로 확인을 요청했고, 앱에서 상담 버튼을 클릭하지 않으면 메세지가 전송될 일은 없으므로 실수로 클릭했을거라는 답변을 받음. 최초 본인 계정의 VIP 고객 서비스 …
😱2
✅ Sandwatch 시즌2 무료 파밍 시작 작년 1월에 파밍 시작했으니까 1년 10개월 정도 된거 같은데 시즌2 시작하네요 🤣 시즌1 동일하게 계정 생성하고 프로필-Increase에서 클리어 가능한 미션들 완료하고 최대 부스트 받아두면 자동으로 팝콘 파밍되는 방식입니다. 질질 끄는걸로 봐선 영 개노맛일거 같긴 하지만 계정 활성화만 해두면 무료파밍 되는 방치형 에어드롭 작업이라 부스트도 무료 소셜미션만 진행해두면 손해볼거 음슴. 셋팅 하실분들 시즌2 궈궈이 🫡 🌐 파밍하기 #sandwatch
❤3👏3👍2🤩1
예?
👎6🤩1
✅ jadebound NFT 무료민팅 이벤트 로빈후드쪽 PRG + 채굴 시뮬레이션 플랫폼입니다. 수량도 적고 프리민팅이라 GTD 2자리 + FCFS 5자리 받아 왔음. 민팅은 다음달 내 진행 예정으로 보이고 아직 자세한 내용은 언급된 바 없습니다. 무료민팅이라 무일푼 프리 리턴이니버너 지갑으로 화리 쟁여 두실분들 궈궈하시죠 🫡 🔸민팅내용 🟢Supply: 2,222 🟢 Price: Free 🟢 Chain: Robinhood 🔸이벤트 참여방법 🟢JADEBOUND 가입하기 🟢트위터 팔로우 🟢디스코드 가입 🔸구글폼 작성하기 # jadebound
👏6❤3👍2🤩1
✅ Axis 에어드롭 체커 오픈 엑시스 에드 체커 나왔네요. 무료파밍이긴 했지만 캠페인 번거로움에 비하면 쌉노맛인듯? 오늘 저녁 9시부터 클레임 가능합니다. 물론 27년 4월 21일까지 베스팅도 있음 🤣 역시나 야핑 온보딩 되는 플랫폼들만 걸러도 에어드롭 파밍 반은 성공이지 않나 싶습니다. 🌐 https://airdrop.axisrobotics.ai/
👍3👏3🤩2
🃏 Blackboard x 3ridge 웨이트리스트 이벤트 라이브 가챠 방송 안내 지난번 발표된 Blackboard x 3ridge 웨이트리스트 오픈 이벤트 당첨자분들의 가챠팩 개봉 및 카드 배정이 오늘 저녁 7시 실시간 라이브 방송을 통해 진행됩니다! 글로벌 웨이트리스트 당첨자(100명)와 3ridge 이벤트 당첨자(120명)의 포켓몬 TCG 가챠를 뀨님과 리리님이 1, 2부로 나누어 연속으로 뽑아드릴 예정입니다. 🔍 당첨 여부 및 내 대기 순번 확인하기 👉 https://app.blackboard.fi/result (※ 라이브 방송에서 본인의 대기 순번대로 가챠를 뽑아 카드가 분배되니, 방송 전 본인의 순번을 반드시 확인해 주세요!) 📅 라이브 방송 일정 및 채널 안내 • 시작 일시: 오늘 10월 18일(일) 오후 7:00시 스타트…
👍8❤2👏2🤩1
✅ Standx 런 선언 근황 퍼프덱스 스탠드x에서 토큰 출시없이 $DUSD 에어드롭하고 샷다 내림 선언했습니다. - 11월 1일 ~ 12월 31일 : DUSD 에어드랍 클레임 - 1월 31일 셧다운 골드만삭스 출신이고 나발이고 이렇게 또 뒤통수를 치는군요. 저는 사전예치 위주 파밍, 그리고 수수료 녹이는 파밍은 찍먹만 해뒀는데 하는꼴 봐선 기껏해야 치킨런일듯..? 사전예치 파밍은 포인트가 꽤 높은편인데 기대안됨; 진짜 악질인게 토큰 공급량 0.25% 야핑에 할당한다고 싸부리면서 소액으로 바이럴 홍보하면서 수수료 쪽 빨아먹고 런각 보는건 좀 그렇네요. 야퍼들의 분노가 느껴진다. 야핑 온보딩된 플랫폼은 쌉노맛이라는걸 다시한번 느낍니다 🤯 📱 공지보기
👎6❤2😭2🤩1
✅ Swarm 노드 $TRUTH 근황 어제 오늘 수이 기반 노드 Swarm으로 파밍할 수 있는 $TRUTH 토큰이 가격 펌핑을 했습니다. 스웜은 AI 에이전트 + zk + sui 조합으로 델리시움 출신 얀닉이 빌딩하는 플랫폼인데 이번에 43을 출시하면서 가격 반등 시작. 43은 예측마켓에 베팅하기 전 지표 확인이나 팩트체크를 하는 도구 정도로 보시면 됩니다. 얀닉형이 진짜 대단한게 모든 노드의 99%는 홀더들 매도세가 강해서 길어야 몇달안에 떡락하는게 수순인데, 스웜은 출시한지 1년이 지난 시점에도 오히려 상장가보다 더 높은 가격을 유지하고 있음. 한탕 해먹으려고 만든 노드라 치기엔 가격방어가 꾸준하긴 했던거 같네요. 사실 가격 상승은 이미 예정되어 있는 수순이었습니다. 3주전 제가 10개월 모은 $TRUTH를 $SUI로 스왑했…
👏4👍3🤩2
Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @honeyoftoday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“오늘의꿀통” (@honeyoftoday), 6,034 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/honeyoftoday.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.