مكتبة قانونية عربية شاملة
هدفنا زيادة ثقافه القانونيه
وتسهيل عملية القراءة
لتواصل مع الادمن والاستشارات والخدمات القانونيه
⏬
https://wwwabdelrahmanfouadodoocom1.odoo.com/
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
49 measurements spanning 79 days, net +611. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,673–25,489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 02:28
25,392
-3
6 Nov 2026, 21:58
25,395
+3
5 Nov 2026, 23:57
25,392
+4
4 Nov 2026, 22:16
25,388
-1
3 Nov 2026, 21:20
25,389
+3
3 Nov 2026, 00:06
25,386
+10
1 Nov 2026, 22:59
25,376
+23
31 Oct 2026, 22:27
25,353
+25
30 Oct 2026, 21:56
25,328
+9
29 Oct 2026, 21:39
25,319
+1
28 Oct 2026, 20:47
25,318
+4
27 Oct 2026, 18:50
25,314
-6
26 Oct 2026, 16:31
25,320
+11
25 Oct 2026, 19:57
25,309
+7
24 Oct 2026, 17:14
25,302
+1
22 Oct 2026, 20:44
25,301
+5
21 Oct 2026, 19:10
25,296
+12
20 Oct 2026, 15:37
25,284
+6
19 Oct 2026, 17:34
25,278
-2
18 Oct 2026, 19:47
25,280
first reading
Engagement
150 posts held, back to 17 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.20%
avg views ÷ 25,392 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,070
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 150 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
150 (17 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
44,767
Reactions total
58
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 09:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,370
Videos
≈8
Links
≈1,090
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
160 reactions across 74 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
147
91.9%
👍
9
5.63%
👏
4
2.50%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 150 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 150 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 42 posts held from the last 30 days (7.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
https://www.facebook.com/share/19bSLtm5By/
هام لكل طفل مريض بمرض #السكر ــ شفاه الله وعافاه ــ
ولكل اب أب أو ام عنده طفل مريض بالسكر ويحتاج لتركيب مضخة وسنسور للانسولين
دلولقتي بنقدم لحضراتكم دعوى امام محكمة القضاء الاداري بإلزام التأمين الصحي بتركيب المضخة على حساب الدولة وفقاً للدستور المصري والذي يراعي على الحفاظ على الصحة العامة لأولادنا.
صيغة دعوى قد يحتاج إليها بعض السادة المحامين الزملاء
مع ت…
👆👆👆👆👇👇👇👇
…..…….................…..همسات قانونية…….….....…….............
من هدايا تيك توك إلى غسل الأموال
الوجه الخفي للاقتصاد الرقمي
جريمة غسل الأموال لم تعد تقتصر على الأساليب التقليدية وإنما امتدت إلى البيئة الرقمية، بواسطة منصات التواصل الاجتماعي وعلى رأسها منصة «تيك توك».
من خلال البث المباشر، يستطيع المستخدم شراء عملات افتراضية واستخدامها في إرسال هدايا رقمية …
https://www.facebook.com/share/19a6WP8fG4/
ثلاث مذكرات دفاع في ثلاث قضايا "شيكات بنكية" صدر فيهم حكم بالبراءة من أمام محكمة جنح العياط بالجيزة، أتشرف بنشر المذكرات لحضراتكم بقصد نشر العلم القانوني وتبادل الخبرات.
الحمد لله والشكر لله على توفيق الله 🤲
المحاماة رسالة وواجب وشرف ⚖️
خالص تحياتي
أ/ مصباح محمد القربة - المحامي
بالاستئناف العالي ومجلس الدولة
👆👆👆👆👇👇👇👇
⚖️ تحذير للزملاء: توقيع بـ٢٠٠ جنيه قد يتحول إلى مساومة على مصير طعن!
#حين يحتاج زميل غير مقيد أمام محكمة النقض إلى الاستعانة بمحامٍ مقيد لتولي مسؤولية مذكرة الأسباب، فقد يقع في فخ مَن يختزل هذه المسؤولية في بيع ختم وتوقيع مقابل مائتين أو ثلاثمائة جنيه.
وتبدأ الخطورة حين تُذيَّل المذكرة بـ«فرمة» يتعذر معها معرفة صاحب التوقيع، ثم تُبدي نيابة النقض رأيها بعدم قبول الطعن شكلًا لعدم ثبوت توقيع الأسباب من محامٍ …
👆👆👆👆👇👇👇👇
⚖️ «بناءً عليه يا أستاذ»… لكننا لم نعرض الدفاع بعد!
حين يترافع السيد وكيل النائب العام في قضية رأي عام، مستندًا إلى مذكرة مكتوبة أو مرافعة أعدّها سلفًا، ننصت إليه؛ احترامًا لدوره، وتقديرًا لمسؤوليته في عرض الاتهام وطلباته.
#والدفاع يستحق الإنصات ذاته.
فالمحامي الذي قضى ساعات طويلة بين أوراق القضية، يربط الوقائع، ويفحص الشهادات، ويناقش التقارير، يحتاج إلى فرصة كافية ليُبيّن للمحكمة موضع الخلل، ودلالة التنا…
https://www.facebook.com/100093005217002/posts/pfbid0oyEa3CLEG2P6c6LdKkr3dijb1vpuzZYXqRMRDBRWkZp1bMMsRJSTAf7gh3Wp6mtcl/
مذكرة دفاع في الدفع بعدم اختصاص محكمة الجنح العادية نوعياً بنظر الجرائم المنصوص عليها في قانون الملكية الفكرية وقانون حماية المستهلك والمرتبطه بالجرائم المنصوص عليها في قانون قمع الغش والتدليس، حتى لو كانت محكمة الجنح العادية مختصة بنظر الجريمة ذات الوصف الأشد.
أشرت في هذه المذكرة إلى العديد من الأ…
👆👆👆👆👇👇👇👇
حرية القاضي الجنائي في تكوين عقيدته بين سلطان الاقتناع وضوابط الرقابة القضائية
الإجابة القانونية الحاسمة هي أن حرية القاضي الجنائي في تكوين عقيدته ليست حرية مطلقة، وإنما هي حرية واسعة تحكمها ضوابط قانونية وعقلية ومنطقية، وتخضع لرقابة محكمة النقض في الحدود التي تتصل بصحة تطبيق القانون وسلامة الاستدلال وكفاية التسبيب.
وهذه المسألة من أدق مسائل قانون الإجراءات الجنائية؛ لأنها تقع عند نقطة التقاء مبدأين جوهريين:…
أما إذا كان حكم البراءة قد أقيم على فهم خاطئ للقانون، أو شابه فساد في الاستدلال أو تناقض جوهري في أسبابه، فقد يخضع لرقابة النقض وفقًا للقواعد المقررة للطعن في الأحكام الجنائية.
وفي المقابل، فإن حكم الإدانة يجب أن يكشف عن أدلة كافية لتكوين عقيدة جازمة بثبوت الجريمة ونسبتها إلى المتهم، وأن يبين الوقائع التي استخلص منها توافر أركانها، مع مراعاة طبيعة الجريمة وظروفها.
ومن هنا، فإن الرقابة لا تعني أن محكمة النقض تفرض على …
3. القصور في التسبيب
إذا خلا الحكم من بيان الأدلة التي أقام عليها الإدانة، أو لم يوضح الواقعة وأركانها بما يكفي، أو أغفل بيانًا جوهريًا لا يمكن من دونه الوقوف على الأساس الذي بُني عليه قضاؤه، جاز أن يكون ذلك سببًا للنقض.
4. التناقض الذي يعيب الحكم
إذا تضمنت أسباب الحكم تناقضًا جوهريًا يستحيل معه التعرف على الأساس الذي أقام عليه القاضي عقيدته، أو تعارضت الأسباب تعارضًا يهدم بعضها بعضًا، فقد يفقد الحكم مقوماته القانوني…
Signed 🎩 Lawyer : Omar Khaled 🎓
Showing the 12 most recent of 150 posts we hold for @horusbooks2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@horusbooks2 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
حسام الموافى المحامى @hossamelmowafy · 18,967 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 4 October 2026
منصة قطوف قانونية الرسمية ⚖️🖤 @RanaELmahy · 20,273 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026
نقابة المحامين المصرية @egyls · 26,175 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
المكتبة القانونية العربية @klaw0 · 40,451 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
المعرفة القانونية - Legal Knowledge @Legal_Knowledgee · 36,972 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 2 September 2026
زي القانون ما بيقول @As_Law_Say · 29,691 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 September 2026
أكاديمية المحاماة @Arabialawer · 20,134 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“المكتبة القانونيه الشاملة AF 🦅” (@horusbooks2), 25,392 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/horusbooks2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.