Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for روایتِ پاک

Channel

روایتِ پاک

@hossein_pak69

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,801subscribers

+784 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002089296480
TypeChannel
Username@hossein_pak69
Descriptionتلاشی برای روایت.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held54
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/hossein_pak69

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,99810,87910,438.55 August 2026 — 10,017 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,017 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,018 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,013 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,018 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,013 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,007 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,005 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,998 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,028 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,051 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,049 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,045 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,067 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,080 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,116 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,128 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,126 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,127 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,122 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,114 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,117 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,118 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,434 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,589 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,879 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,878 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,879 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,866 subscribers25 September 2026 — 10,835 subscribers4 October 2026 — 10,843 subscribers8 October 2026 — 10,837 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,822 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,815 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,814 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,812 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,806 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,798 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,796 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,794 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,789 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,782 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,777 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,776 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,778 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,780 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,781 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,779 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,776 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,775 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,780 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,786 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,800 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,801 subscribers10,8015 August 20266 November 2026
54 measurements spanning 92 days, net +784. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,866–11,011 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 54
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 01:5610,801+1
4 Nov 2026, 23:2010,800+14
3 Nov 2026, 22:2610,786+6
2 Nov 2026, 22:0110,780+5
1 Nov 2026, 20:5610,775-1
31 Oct 2026, 22:0610,776-3
30 Oct 2026, 02:4110,779-2
29 Oct 2026, 00:2810,781+1
27 Oct 2026, 22:2910,780+2
26 Oct 2026, 23:5010,778+2
25 Oct 2026, 21:2810,776-1
24 Oct 2026, 01:5510,777-5
23 Oct 2026, 05:0910,782-7
22 Oct 2026, 06:0710,789-5
20 Oct 2026, 22:3510,794-2
19 Oct 2026, 21:5610,796-2
18 Oct 2026, 18:2110,798-8
17 Oct 2026, 14:5810,806-6
16 Oct 2026, 17:1910,812-2
15 Oct 2026, 14:4610,814first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.9%
avg views ÷ 10,801 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,110
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held58 (17 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total78,240
Reactions total2,413
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 08:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
976
Videos
456
Links
248

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 01s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,650 reactions across 54 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7,25862.3%
👍2,17518.7%
💔8177.01%
💯6055.19%
😭5895.06%
👎2061.77%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,799 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 55 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hossein_pak69. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 58 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,700 views233 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🔻این روزها مدام می‌پرسید: «جنگ می‌شود؟» شاید چند شب تاریک بگذرد، اما هیچ شبی آن‌قدر طولانی نیست که صبح نیاید. دشمن به هدفش نمی‌رسد؛ به لطف خدا، به اراده‌ی مردم و به همت پاسداران و بسیجیان. 🔻 @hossein_pak69

❤200👍23💯10

4 Nov 2026, 07:43 UTC≈7,230 views382 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🔻پیروزی صورت‌های آفتاب‌سوخته‌ ای که تنگه ی هرمز را بستند، بر عقل‌های کولرخورده‌ای که چند ر‌وز جان کندند تا با یک «بدهیم‌برود»ِ دیگر فرعون را رام کنند. 🔻 @hossein_pak69

❤322👍47💯11👎2

2 Nov 2026, 18:39 UTC≈6,840 views379 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🔻صبح‌ها خودم زینب را به مدرسه می‌رسانم؛ از جاده‌ی فرودگاه تا الغبیری، تا برسیم به مدرسه‌اش که نزدیک روضة‌الحوراء (بهشت شهدای ضاحیه) است. از خانه که بیرون می‌آییم، می‌بینیم دشمن دو ساختمانِ روبه‌روی خانه‌مان را زده است. وارد الغبیری هم که می‌شویم، دشمن چندین ساختمان دیگر را هم زده است. زینب هر روز می‌پرسد: «چرا ساختمان‌ها را می‌زنند؟» ظهرها که برمی‌گردیم، ترافیک سنگین است. برای این‌که زودتر برسیم، گاهی از داخل اردوگاه…

❤305😭65👍9

1 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTC≈4,110 views142 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

‏🔻بیست وشش روز پیش از آغاز جنگ رمضان، امام شهیدمان فرمودند که جنگ منطقه‌ای خواهد بود. تحلیل روشن بود و نتیجه روشن‌تر: ما جنگی منطقه‌ای و گاه فرامنطقه‌ای را آغاز کردیم، از همه سو به دشمن حمله‌ور شدیم و دارایی‌های استراتژیک او را تا حد قابل‌توجهی از کار انداختیم. در همه جبهه‌ها، جز یک جبهه، عملکردی کم‌نظیر داشتیم. ‏این‌بار، استراتژی جنگی ارتقایافته‌مان را که امام جوان ابلاغ فرمودند، در دو چیز می‌بینم: برداشته شدن محدود…

💯92❤29👍17👎4

27 Oct 2026, 17:39 UTC≈6,430 views308 reactionsread 6 November 2026

‏🔻امشب آغاز سقوط آخرین پادشاه بنی صهیون در سرزمین غصب شده خواهد بود. 🔻 @hossein_pak69

❤214👍52💯23👎19

26 Oct 2026, 12:18 UTC≈7,470 views144 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

🔻صندوق رأی در تل‌آویو؛ ساعت جنگ جابه‌جا می‌شود، جهتش نه فردا، ۵ آبان، انتخابات کنست رژیم صهیونیستی برگزار می‌شود. نظرسنجی‌های نهایی به اپوزیسیون ۵۲ تا ۵۶ و به بلوک نتانیاهو ۴۸ تا ۵۰ کرسی می‌دهند؛ هیچ‌کدام به ۶۱ نمی‌رسد. سؤال اصلی برای ما: آیا جابه‌جایی قدرت در این رژیم، سیاستش در قبال ایران را عوض می‌کند؟ پاسخ کوتاه: تاکتیک شاید، استراتژی نه. 🔴 آنچه ممکن است تغییر کند: تاکتیک و زمان‌بندی اپوزیسیون با جنگ مخالف نیست…

👍116❤19💯9

23 Oct 2026, 12:35 UTC≈8,900 views173 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🔻هدف قرار گرفتن یک ایست بازرسی در الخلیل، بار دیگر ساختار امنیتی کیان موقت صهیونیستی را با چالشی جدی مواجه کرده و دستگاه‌های امنیتی آن را سردرگم ساخته است. آسیب‌پذیرترین نقطه این رژیم، کرانه باختری و آسیب‌پذیرترین مؤلفه آن در کرانه، هیبت امنیتی و اقتدار ادعایی‌اش است. ایست‌های بازرسی و مراکز توزیع سلاح از جمله نقاط حساس این ساختار امنیتی به شمار می‌روند. وارد آوردن آسیب جدی به اقتدار این رژیم در کرانه باختری امکان‌پذ…

❤138👍24💯10👎1

20 Oct 2026, 20:13 UTCviews —

روایتِ پاک pinned «امیرالمؤمنین علی علیه‌السلام: «وَاللَّهِ لَا أُبَالِي، أَدَخَلْتُ إِلَى الْمَوْتِ أَوْ خَرَجَ الْمَوْتُ إِلَيَّ.»»

20 Oct 2026, 20:13 UTC≈6,640 views161 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

امیرالمؤمنین علی علیه‌السلام: «وَاللَّهِ لَا أُبَالِي، أَدَخَلْتُ إِلَى الْمَوْتِ أَوْ خَرَجَ الْمَوْتُ إِلَيَّ.»

❤159👍1👎1

16 Oct 2026, 12:12 UTC≈8,520 views201 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🔻میلاد حضرت زینب کبری سلام‌الله‌علیها، میلاد آرمان جوانی نسل ماست؛ نسلی که دفاع از حرم اهل‌بیت علیهم‌السلام را از یک باور عمیق اعتقادی به معادله‌ای راهبردی در میدان تبدیل کرد. با جرأت می‌توان گفت خون شهدای مدافع حرم و دفاع از مقدسات، چنان هزینه‌ای برای تعرض به حرم‌های اهل‌بیت تعریف کرد که حتی پس از سقوط حکومت سوریه و دگرگونی کامل موازنه قدرت، این حریم همچنان از تعرض گسترده مصون ماند. 🔴این شاید یکی از مهم‌ترین میراث…

❤168💔18👍7💯5😭2👎1

16 Oct 2026, 12:03 UTC≈10,100 views85 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🔻نتانیاهو در آستانه انتخابات با بحران تشکیل دولت مواجه است. حتی کسب بیشترین کرسی نیز بدون دستیابی به اکثریت ۶۱ کرسی برای او ارزشی ندارد. از سوی دیگر، ایزنکوت نیز با محدودیت جدی در ائتلاف‌سازی روبه‌روست. این بن‌بست، انتخابات را به مسئله بقای سیاسی نتانیاهو تبدیل کرده است. در چنین معادله‌ای، تشدید بحران امنیتی می‌تواند به ابزاری برای تغییر دستور کار انتخابات، بازآرایی ائتلاف‌ها یا حتی توجیه تعویق آن تبدیل شود. خطر اصلی…

👍71❤9💯5

10 Oct 2026, 10:07 UTC≈10,300 views205 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🔻مسئله در مواضع محمدجواد ظریف، فراتر از یک اختلاف کارشناسی با شهید حاج قاسم سلیمانی به نظر می‌رسد. استمرار این تقابل، حتی پس از شهادت ایشان، این پرسش جدی را ایجاد می‌کند که چرا به جای بهره‌برداری از میراث راهبردی و دستاوردهای منطقه‌ای نیروی قدس، همچنان بر برجسته‌سازی تعارض میان میدان و دیپلماسی اصرار می‌شود؟ از منظر مطالعات سیاست خارجی، شبکه روابط منطقه‌ای، نفوذ سیاسی و ظرفیت‌های امنیتی برون‌مرزی، بخشی از سرمایه راهب…

❤127👍60💯9💔7👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @hossein_pak69. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @hossein_pak69 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

علی عبدی/ دیده‌بان تحرکات کِریا
@kriyaassess · 21,968
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 September 2026
الجزیره به فارسی
@AjaNews_persian · 21,639
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 September 2026
يك حامد عسكری معمولی
@hamedaskary · 23,234
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
ParsinTV l پارسین
@ParsinTv · 17,179
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 September 2026
IranicTV
@iranictv · 19,158
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 October 2026
بسپاریم به خدا
@Sajedifr · 55,413
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
جبهه جهانی شباب المقاومة
@sh_almoqawamma · 22,733
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
مُحَلِّل
@Mohallell · 25,284
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
رسانه تبیینی نجم
@naajm_ir · 24,924
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
أخٌ‌في‌الله
@mhrezaa2 · 39,744
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
چین امروز
@cri_persian_china · 65,727
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 October 2026
🚩 بادبان| رسانه هنر ایران
@Badbannewss · 13,467
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 September 2026
جدال- علی عليزاده
@jedaal · 57,672
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
خط انرژی
@khate_energy · 33,317
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“روایتِ پاک” (@hossein_pak69), 10,801 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hossein_pak69.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.