Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 허재환 유진증권 전략

Channel

허재환 유진증권 전략

@huhjae

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

12,830subscribers

+64 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001282130134
TypeChannel
Username@huhjae
Created21 June 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/huhjae

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

12,76312,84312,8036 August 2026 — 12,766 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,766 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,767 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,772 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,775 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,774 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,771 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,773 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,768 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,769 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,763 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,781 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,799 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,823 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,827 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,816 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,843 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,840 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,833 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,831 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,832 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,834 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,832 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,829 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,823 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,828 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,830 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,827 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,830 subscribers12,8306 August 202611 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 36 days, net +64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,751–12,855 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 12:5812,830+3
8 Sept 2026, 22:3512,827-3
5 Sept 2026, 18:3912,830+2
3 Sept 2026, 18:3712,828+5
2 Sept 2026, 12:5212,823-6
1 Sept 2026, 14:2412,829-3
31 Aug 2026, 15:3712,832-2
30 Aug 2026, 17:3612,834+2
29 Aug 2026, 19:0812,832+1
28 Aug 2026, 20:2412,831-2
27 Aug 2026, 21:3712,833-7
27 Aug 2026, 00:1712,840-3
25 Aug 2026, 22:5412,843+27
25 Aug 2026, 00:3712,816-11
23 Aug 2026, 10:5912,827+4
21 Aug 2026, 19:5512,823+24
20 Aug 2026, 17:2212,799+18
19 Aug 2026, 15:4912,781+18
18 Aug 2026, 16:2212,763-6
17 Aug 2026, 12:5212,769first reading

Engagement

184 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.7%
avg views ÷ 12,830 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,500
124 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.396%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
124
of 184 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 107 of 124 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held184 (3 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total185,508
Reactions total650
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,023 reactions across 160 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
56355.0%
👍18518.1%
🔥545.28%
👏434.20%
🦄414.01%
🤔272.64%
😁191.86%
🤯151.47%
👾141.37%
131.27%
🙏131.27%
👀70.684%
50.489%
😢50.489%
🥰50.489%
👻30.293%
🕊30.293%
🍾10.098%
🎅10.098%
🎉10.098%
5 further kinds50.489%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 162 of the 184 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,023 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 184 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 07:52 UTC994 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @buykkang

안녕하세요, 유진투자증권 강송철입니다, 배당주/배당성장 종목을 업데이트해 봤습니다, 금리가 높고 시장 변동이 큰 상황에서 볼 만한 종목이 되지 않을까 생각됩니다, 자료 참고 부탁드립니다, 감사합니다~ # 금리 상승기의 배당주, 퀄리티 주식 (26/9/2) 유진증권 ETF/파생 강송철 (02-368-6153) * 52주 신고가 ETF: 정유, 커머디티, 농산물, 현금(cash) - 최근 3개월 수익률 상위 ETF: 화장품과 함께 금융: 은행, 보험 ETF 수익률 상위 기록. - ‘금리 상승’이 배경. 일본, 미국 등도 금리 상승과 함께 금융주 주가 상승 - 금리 높은 국면에서 “퀄리티(Quality)” 주식 유리. 배당을 늘리거나 배당수익률 높은 종목은 퀄리티 주식의 특성 - 투자할 만한 배당주 업데이트. 최근 2년 연속 배당 늘린 종목

🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 22:59 UTC≈1,490 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026

안녕하세요, 유진투자증권 시황 담당 이준영 입니다. 자세한 내용은 자료 참고 부탁드립니다. 감사합니다! Eugene Daily Snapshot - 기타법인 매수 지지에 코스피 강보합 사수(9/2)⚖️ * 간밤 뉴욕증시 3대 지수 약세 마감 & 필 반도체 -2.1%. 중동發 지정학 위험 수위 올라가면서 유가·장기금리 동반 급등 → 장기 듀레이션 자산 디레이팅. 에너지·경기방어 강세 vs 소재·정보기술 약세. * WTI 연결물 +5.2%($90.22) 급등, 7/23일($92.19) 이후 최고. 미국채 장기물도 연중 최고 수준, 10년물 4.79%(+4.1bp)로 25/1월 이후 최고 & 30년물 5.27%(+3.2bp). * 전일 국내 증시는 이틀째 비슷한 그림. 코스피 강보합(+0.2%)·코스닥 하락(-1.6%). 코스피는 기관 순매도

8🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 22:44 UTC995 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @buykkang

• Check : WTI +6%, 90.8$/b. 농업(MOO) +1.7%. 에너지 업종(IYE, VDE) 신고가 ■ Global ETF Daily & News ■ (2026/09/02) 유진증권 ETF/파생 강송철 (02-368-6153) ▶️ 전일 상승 상위/하위 * Gainers: USO(+5.5%), DBC(+2.0%), XOP(+2.0%), UGA(+1.9%), IXC(+1.7%) * Losers: PALL(-4.4%), HACK(-4.4%), CIBR(-3.9%), GDX(-3.9%), COPX(-3.9%) ▶️ 최근 5일 상승 상위/하위 * Gainers: USO(+11.8%), UGA(+9.7%), WEAT(+9.3%), XOP(+5.5%), OIH(+5.2%) * Losers: GDX(-10.3%), URA(-8.7%

2🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 22:44 UTC≈1,180 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @buykkang

(2) - 월요일 미국은 해협에 기뢰를 부설할 준비를 하던 이란의 로켓 발사대를 타격했다고 밝혔고, 이란은 아랍에미리트(UAE)와 요르단을 공격하며 보복했음. - 긴장이 고조되는 가운데 베선트 미국 재무장관은 화요일 호르무즈의 중요성을 낮춰 평가하며, 송유관 이용이 늘어나면서 해협은 결국 의미를 잃게 될 것이라고 말했음. - 다만 이 발언은 에너지 수송 경로를 그만큼 대대적으로 전환하는 데 걸리는 시간을 감안하지 않은 것으로 보이며, 알루미늄과 비료 등 다른 주요 원자재는 여전히 이 해협을 지나야 함. - 미 국무부는 화요일 역내 미국인들에게 "복잡한" 환경과 "예기치 못한 격화 가능성"을 경고하는 안전 공지를 발령. - 두 달여 전 체결된 잠정 평화 합의가 무산된 이후 미국과 이란 모두 협상 재개에 별다른 의지를 보이지 않고 있음.

8🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 04:24 UTC≈1,220 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @buykkang

Japan's 10-Year Bond Yield Hits 3% for First Time Since 1996 (9/1) - 일본의 10년물 국채 금리가 이번 세기 들어 처음으로 3%에 도달했음. 벤치마크 조달 비용이 수년간 0% 근처에 머물렀던 일본 채권시장이 정상 상태로 돌아가고 있음을 보여주는 중요한 이정표임 - 9월 1일 화요일 금리는 장중 최대 6bp 오르며 3%를 찍었고, 이는 1996년 이후 가장 높은 수준임. 지난해 이맘때만 해도 이 수준의 절반에 불과했다는 점에서 변화의 속도를 짐작할 수 있으며, 그 여파는 일본 경제와 글로벌 금융시장 전반으로 번지고 있음. - 일본은행(BOJ)이 2024년 세계 마지막 남은 마이너스 금리 정책을 종료한 이후 일본 채권시장의 작동 방식은 크게 달라졌음. 과거에는 일본은행의 손아귀에 놓여 있

2🔥2

31 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC≈1,340 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @buykkang

(2) - 트럼프는 만만치 않은 정치적 난관에 놓여 있음. - 중동에서의 인기 없는 전쟁은 미국 경제에 부담을 주고 국제 무대에서 미국의 위상을 흔들었으며 트럼프의 지지율을 역사적 저점까지 끌어내렸음. - 공화당은 이제 하원뿐 아니라 상원까지 잃을 위험에 처했음. - 민주당이 의회를 되찾을 경우 세 번째 탄핵 가능성이 백악관을 짓누르고 있음. - 트럼프의 두 번째 임기를 지지하며 선거운동에 나섰고 전쟁 문제로 갈라서기 전까지 그에게 정기적으로 조언했던 터커 칼슨(Tucker Carlson) 전 폭스뉴스 진행자는 "그는 자신의 유산을 선택했고, 그것은 이란과의 전쟁, 미 제국의 몰락, 그리고 미국 경제의 파괴다"라고 말함. - 트럼프가 퇴임 이후의 유산을 생각한다는 사실 자체가 눈에 띄는 변화임. - 보좌진은 그가 공직에서 물러나 있던 시기

🤣1😁1

31 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC≈1,060 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @buykkang

• Check : 유가 상승. 에너지(XLE) +2%, 가솔린(UGA) +2%, 커머디티(COM) 신고가, • 이더 +2%, 비트 +2% ■ Global ETF Daily & News ■ (2026/09/01) 유진증권 ETF/파생 강송철 (02-368-6153) ▶️ 전일 상승 상위/하위 * Gainers: USO(+3.1%), OIH(+2.6%), XLE(+2.0%), UGA(+2.0%), ETHA(+1.9%) * Losers: PALL(-3.9%), JETS(-2.3%), PEJ(-2.3%), TAN(-2.2%), XAR(-2.0%) ▶️ 최근 5일 상승 상위/하위 * Gainers: WEAT(+9.2%), CIBR(+7.4%), IGV(+7.4%), HACK(+6.8%), OIH(+5.0%) * Losers: PEJ(-5.0

3😁1

31 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC≈1,260 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026

안녕하세요, 유진투자증권 시황 담당 이준영 입니다. 자세한 내용은 자료 참고 부탁드립니다. 감사합니다! Eugene Daily Snapshot - 수급 빈곤 속 기타법인 홀로 지켜낸 보합장(9/1)🏋️‍♂️ * 8월 마지막 거래일, 간밤 뉴욕증시 3대 지수 동반 하락. 다우 -0.7%·S&P500 -0.3%·나스닥 -0.1%·필 반도체 +0.6%. 유가·금리 동반 상승이 지수 압박. 8월 월간은 견조. 다우 +1.3%·S&P500 +2.6%·나스닥 +3.9%·필 반도체 +2%. * 美·이란 한 달 만의 상호 공습. 美는 호르무즈 해협 인근 이란 기뢰 발사대 2곳 타격, IRGC는 보복으로 요르단 내 미군기지를 미사일·드론 공격. WTI 연결물 $85.76(+2.8%). * 잭슨홀 워시 의장 매파 발언 부담도 지속. CME FedWatc

5

31 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC≈2,870 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026

[Web발신] 안녕하십니까 유진투자증권 허재환입니다 =꺼꾸로 가는 코스피와 환율= * 지난 8/20일 원달러가 1,380원대에서 달러를 사도 되지 않을까 하는 의견을 드렸던 적이 있습니다. * 그때 논리는 6/5일 이후 원달러가 11% 하락해 단기 하락 폭이 컸고, 9월이면 원화 강세 요인, 즉 SK하이닉스 ADR 자금 유입(37~38조원)과 법인세 중간 납부 기간이 끝난다는 것이었습니다. * 지금 원달러가 1,360원대입니다. 그 사이 SK하이닉스와 삼성전자의 100조원이 넘는 주주환원 계획이 공개되었습니다. 한국은행은 기준금리를 인상했습니다(3%). * 좀 민망하지만 원달러가 반등하더라도 미미할 가능성에 대비할 필요가 있습니다. * 지난 12개월 동안 증권투자로 순유출된 규모는 약 43조원 됩니다. 해외 투자가 지속되더라도, 1

19🔥1

30 Aug 2026, 22:41 UTC≈2,270 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026

[Web발신] 안녕하십니까 유진투자증권 허재환입니다 =워시의장의 변신= * 워시의장의 잭슨홀 연설 이후 9월 금리인상 가능성(36%에서 55%)이 높아졌습니다. * 그래도 긍정적인 것은 워시의장이 시장이 싫어하는 불확실성을 해소하려 했다는 사실입니다. * 1) 7월 FOMC회의 당시만 해도 인플레 목표를 여러 지표로 넓게 언급했으나, 이번에는 2% 근원 PCE물가 목표가 확고부동하다고 했습니다. * 2) 대차대조표를 통한 정책 활용 여지를 일축하며, 단기금리가 연준 목표 달성의 압도적인 주요 수단이라고 밝혔습니다. * 3) 현재 금융여건이 긴축적이지 않다고 했고, 최근 인플레 일부 둔화는 근본 추세가 아니라고 했습니다. * 반드시 9월 인상이 아니더라도 조만간 인상 가능성이 확실해졌습니다. * 가장 큰 의미는 재무부와 연준의 정

20👍5🔥1

30 Aug 2026, 03:49 UTC≈1,750 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @buykkangPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥4

30 Aug 2026, 03:49 UTC≈1,680 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @buykkangPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 184 posts we hold for @huhjae. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@huhjae edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“허재환 유진증권 전략” (@huhjae), 12,830 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/huhjae.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.