Hypersec pinned a photo

Channel
Hypersec
@hypersec
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,522subscribers
+144 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001003446135 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hypersec |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hypersec |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 09:00 | 4,522 | +8 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 01:16 | 4,514 | +13 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 4,501 | +4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 4,497 | +11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 4,486 | +11 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 4,475 | +16 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:25 | 4,459 | +16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 4,443 | +11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 4,432 | +7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 4,425 | +7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 4,418 | +6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 4,412 | +10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 4,402 | +14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 4,388 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:10 | 4,380 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 4,378 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 22m 02s
- Average length
- 11m 01s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
36 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 77.8% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 13.9% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 5.56% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 October 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🎓در این دوره، شرکتکنندگان با نسخههای مختلف Splunk Enterprise Security و قابلیتهای پیشرفته ES Premier آشنا شده و تغییرات و قابلیتهای جدید ارائهشده در نسخه 8.5. را از طریق بررسی Release Noteها فرا خواهند گرفت . همچنین الزامات فنی، پیشنیازهای زیرساختی و ملاحظات طراحی و استقرار Enterprise Security بهصورت جامع مورد بررسی قرار میگیرد . بخش مهمی از دوره به مفاهیم بنیادین Enterprise Security شامل Data Models، Data…
❤2
🚨 وجود DKIM همیشه به معنی امن بودن ایمیل نیست! یکی از تکنیکهای بسیار جالب و خطرناک در حملات ایمیلی، چیزی است به نام DKIM Replay Attack ؛ حملهای که در آن مهاجم از ایمیلهای واقعی و معتبر سرویسهایی مثل Apple و PayPal سوءاستفاده میکند تا پیام فیشینگ یا فریبدهنده خود را معتبر جلوه دهد. در این تکنیک، مهاجم ابتدا از یک سرویس قانونی استفاده میکند و متن مخرب یا فریبدهندهای مثل شماره تماس جعلی پشتیبانی را در یکی از…
Hypersec pinned a photo
شرکت فناوری راه نو سورین به منظور توسعه فعالیتهای خود، از افراد توانمند و علاقهمند به فروش محصولات و خدمات فناوری اطلاعات، جهت همکاری دعوت مینماید. 💼در صورتی که دارای مهارتهای ارتباطی قوی ، روحیه یادگیری و توانایی مذاکره هستید، مشتاق دریافت رزومه شما میباشیم. شرح وظایف: 🔹 ایجاد لید فروش و مذاکره برای جذب مشتریان جدید 🔹 مذاکره با مشتریان جهت انعقاد قرارداد 🔹 جلب رضایت مشتریان از پروژههای جاری 🔹 تنظیم قرارداد ف…
❤1
📌 پلیبوک Use Case برای SIEM در سال ۲۰۲۶ در این داکیومنت، ۱۰۰ سناریوی پیشرفته و کاربردی برای کشف تهدیدات مدرن طراحی شده است. 🔹 ویژگیهای کلیدی: ✔️ تمرکز ویژه بر روی حملات هویتمحور (Identity-based Attacks) ✔️ نگاشت دقیق هر سناریو با تاکتیکها و تکنیکهای MITRE ATT&CK ✔️ ارائه نقشه راه برای ایجاد Correlation، ساخت Building Blockها و کاهش نویز در سیستم ✔️ راهنمای عملی تریاژ و پاسخ به حادثه (Incident Response) برای ت…
👍2❤1
Logic Apps & Automation 🛡 معماری SOAR برای مقابله با حملات هویتی (بدون لایسنس Enterprise E5) بدون قابلیتهای گرانقیمت مایکروسافت هم میتوان حملات Brute-Force را مهار کرد. ترکیب Microsoft Sentinel و Azure Logic Apps چرخه واکنش خودکاری میسازد. https://www.hanley.cloud/2024-08-16-Logic-Apps-&-Automation/ #SOAR #MicrosoftSentinel #LogicApps تیم سورین
🔥 هکفلیکس (Hackflix): نتفلیکسِ متخصصین امنیت سایبری! اگر شما هم همیشه درگیر پیدا کردن ویدیوی ارائههای کنفرانسهای امنیتی مثل Black Hat، DEF CON یا BSides بین هزاران ویدیوی بیربط یوتیوب هستید، سایت h4ckfl1x دقیقاً همون ابزاریه که بهش نیاز دارید. این پلتفرم یک آرشیو عظیم با بیش از ۱۹,۰۰۰ ویدیوی تخصصی از ۵۵۰+ رویداد امنیتیه که کار رو برای یادگیری و Research بهشدت راحت کرده. شعار سایت هم جالبه: "Teach me something I…
🙏1
🛡 This matrix provides a centralized view of all hunting leads. It is automatically updated via our Python automation suite. 🔗 لینک مخزن برای بررسی و استفاده: https://github.com/mguideit/CrowdStrike-CQL-Hunting-Leads/blob/main/ATTACK_MATRIX.md #CrowdStrike #ThreatHunting #MITRE_ATTACK تیم سورین
Measure Twice: Exploring the Evaluation of Agentic Security Detection Systems این مقاله بیان میکند که ورود عوامل هوشمند (Agentic AI) به مراکز عملیات امنیت (SOC)، تشخیص تهدیدات را از یک فرآیند قطعیِ مبتنی بر رولهای شفاف، به یک جریان احتمالی و پیچیده تبدیل کرده است؛ بنابراین، برای اتکا به این سیستمها دیگر نباید صرفاً به نتیجهی نهایی (درست یا غلط بودن هشدار) بسنده کنیم، بلکه باید با چارچوبهای علمی و موشکافانه، تما…
❤1
🛡 شروع مسیر ورود به دنیای امنیت سایبری با دوره Beginner SOC Analyst اگر قصد دارید به عنوان تحلیلگر مرکز عملیات امنیت (SOC) وارد بازار کار شوید، این دوره ۴۲ ساعته تمامی مفاهیم پایه و مهارتهای مورد نیاز شما را پوشش میدهد. 👨💻 📚 سرفصلهای کلیدی این دوره: 🔸 آشنایی با مفاهیم SOC و طرز تفکر یک تحلیلگر 🔸 اصول لاگگیری و مبانی SIEM 🔸 هوش تهدیدات (Threat Intelligence) 🔸 منطق تشخیص حملات و سناریوهای حمله و دفاع 🔸 تحلیل ترا…
❤1
AV/EDR Lab Env Setup این ریپازیتوری در واقع یک مرجع جامع و طبقهبندیشده از ابزارها، تکنیکها و مستندات برای ساخت یک محیط آزمایشگاهی پیشرفته EDR و آنتیویروس (AV) است. هدف اصلی این مستند، کمک به توسعهدهندگان بدافزار (Maldev) برای تست تکنیکهای دور زدن (Bypass) و همچنین کمک به تیمهای دفاعی برای درک معماری داخلی EDRهاست. 🛡https://an0nud4y.notion.site/AV-EDR-Lab-Env-Setup-130bc870022d8071935cc682d3eb34b9 #EDR #Mal…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hypersec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@hypersec named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@shabake_karan · 25,599
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
@Black_Security · 63,961
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 August 2026
@BlueTeamOps · 27,845
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 11 September 2026
@Hide01 · 35,481
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 2 September 2026
@anonopiran · 20,521
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 September 2026
@kali_linuxxx · 76,129
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 August 2026
@RedBlueTM · 21,383
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 23 September 2026
@IRCyberGuardians · 20,028
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 30 September 2026
@Nova_Package · 26,042
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 1 October 2026
@denait · 21,233
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
@learningnets · 30,735
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 7 September 2026
@cyberbannews_ir · 102,458
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 August 2026
@thehackernews · 163,733
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 13 August 2026
@PentestingNews · 27,008
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 12 September 2026
@Netwo0rk · 53,032
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 August 2026
@Linuxor · 31,961
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 September 2026
@AOrgan · 49,570
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 August 2026
@faketic · 23,409
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 18 September 2026
@cibsecurity · 28,431
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 10 September 2026
@CCNA_CCNP_HUAWEI · 19,325
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 2 October 2026
@VIP30T · 19,707
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 30 September 2026
@Kaliboys · 28,685
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
@pafiha · 34,945
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 September 2026
@Computer_Science100 · 46,856
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hypersec” (@hypersec), 4,522 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hypersec.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.