Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -215. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,746–29,025 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 02:59
28,778
-21
16 Sept 2026, 15:37
28,799
-1
14 Sept 2026, 16:42
28,800
-11
13 Sept 2026, 03:55
28,811
-11
11 Sept 2026, 07:21
28,822
-20
8 Sept 2026, 10:38
28,842
-19
5 Sept 2026, 03:40
28,861
-10
3 Sept 2026, 08:47
28,871
-1
2 Sept 2026, 02:52
28,872
-7
1 Sept 2026, 05:06
28,879
-5
31 Aug 2026, 05:27
28,884
+2
30 Aug 2026, 05:13
28,882
-3
29 Aug 2026, 03:24
28,885
-1
28 Aug 2026, 00:08
28,886
-13
27 Aug 2026, 03:05
28,899
-2
26 Aug 2026, 02:58
28,901
-2
25 Aug 2026, 04:59
28,903
-3
24 Aug 2026, 03:38
28,906
-6
22 Aug 2026, 13:42
28,912
-8
20 Aug 2026, 09:06
28,920
first reading
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.48%
avg views ÷ 28,778 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,730
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.459%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held
47 (21 July 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total
40,925
Reactions total
188
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Sept 2026, 07:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,760
Videos
≈383
Links
≈1,330
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 24s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,045 reactions across 46 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
339
32.4%
❤
306
29.3%
🔥
90
8.61%
👎
82
7.85%
😁
68
6.51%
💔
50
4.78%
🤣
37
3.54%
🍌
25
2.39%
🆒
20
1.91%
🗿
12
1.15%
🤔
10
0.957%
🙈
4
0.383%
🙊
2
0.191%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✔️ مهندس دیپسیک: شاید هوش مصنوعی تا یک سال دیگر از من بهتر شود!
«لیو شنگیو»، مهندس سیستمهای یادگیری ماشین دیپسیک، در یادداشتی شخصی از سرعت عجیب پیشرفت هوش مصنوعی در حوزه تخصصی خودش گفته است.
به گفته او، هوش مصنوعی طی تنها یک سال از ابزاری ساده برای پیدا کردن مستندات و باگها، به سیستمی رسیده که میتواند کدهای سطح پایین را تحلیل کرده و Kernelهای پردازشی را بهینه کند.
لیو پیشبینی میکند که شاید طی ۶ تا ۱۲ ماه آ…
✔️ باگی که صدها میلیارد دلار برای جهان هزینه داشت!
در کامپیوترهای قدیمی، برای صرفهجویی در حافظه، سال را معمولاً با دو رقم ذخیره میکردند؛ یعنی سال ۱۹۹۹ بهصورت «۹۹» ثبت میشد.
با رسیدن سال ۲۰۰۰، این نگرانی وجود داشت که برخی سیستمها عدد «۰۰» را بهعنوان سال ۱۹۰۰ تشخیص دهند.
این مشکل با نام باگ هزاره شناخته شد و میتوانست سیستمهای بانکی، حملونقل، زیرساختها و سامانههای دولتی را دچار اختلال کند.
برای جلوگیری از…
✔️ مدل هوش مصنوعی جدیدی که بهجای حرف زدن، تصمیم میگیرد!
شرکت TypeSafe AI از مدل جدیدی به نام Jev رونمایی کرده که برخلاف مدلهایی مثل GPT و Claude، برای گفتگو یا تولید متن ساخته نشده؛ وظیفه اصلی آن تصمیمگیری سریع برای نرمافزارها و Agentهای هوش مصنوعی است.
در Jev گزینههای ممکن از قبل مشخص میشوند و مدل مستقیماً تصمیم خود را همراه با احتمال و میزان اطمینان برمیگرداند؛ بدون اینکه مجبور باشد مثل یک LLM، پاسخ را کل…
✔️ هوش مصنوعی Claude ۲۶ درصد از فرایند توسعه آنتروپیک را پیش میبرد
آنتروپیک اعلام کرد که هوش مصنوعی Claude اکنون رهبری ۲۶ درصد از فعالیتهای تحقیق و توسعه هوش مصنوعی این شرکت را بر عهده دارد و در بیش از ۹۰ درصد تحقیقات نیز با انسانها همکاری میکند.
این شرکت همچنین بیان کرد که Claude در هیچیک از بخشهای اندازهگیریشده این فعالیتها بهطور کامل خودمختار عمل نمیکند، اما سهم آن در توسعه این فناوری بهسرعت افزایش ی…
🧠 مغز یک مگس حالا میتواند بازیهای کامپیوتری اجرا کند!
پژوهشگران موفق شدهاند نقشهای بسیار دقیق از مغز و سیستم عصبی مرکزی مگس میوه نر بالغ تهیه کنند؛ شبکهای متشکل از بیش از ۱۶۶ هزار نورون و میلیونها اتصال عصبی.
انتشار این دادهها باعث شده توسعهدهندگان سراغ آزمایش جالبی بروند: استفاده از شبکه عصبی مگس برای کنترل بازیها و محیطهای مجازی.
تا امروز نمونههایی از اجرای Doom، Super Mario 64 و Beat Saber با استفاده ا…
✔️ گزارش آنتروپیک از سوءاستفاده گسترده از Claude
آنتروپیک در گزارش امنیتی جدید خود، موارد متعددی از سوءاستفاده گروهها و نهادهای مختلف در سراسر جهان از Claude را منتشر کرده است.
در بخشی از گزارش، چند عملیات مرتبط با ایران شناسایی شده که از هوش مصنوعی برای تولید و بازنویسی محتوا، تحلیل اطلاعات عمومی و فعالیتهای سایبری استفاده کردهاند.
در پروندهای جداگانه، شبکهای منتسب به MEK/NCRI حدود ۸۴۰۰ پست تلگرام یک فعال وا…
✔️ پژوهشگر ارشد آنتروپیک: احتمال نابودی بشر توسط AI در دهه آینده بیش از ۱۰ درصد است
«ایوان هوبینگر»، سرپرست بخش Alignment Science در شرکت آنتروپیک، در اظهارنظری کمسابقه اعلام کرده که از دید شخصی او، احتمال اینکه هوش مصنوعی طی ۱۰ سال آینده به نابودی تمام انسانها منجر شود، بیش از ۱۰ درصد است.
هوبینگر تأکید کرده که ریسک مدلهای فعلی هوش مصنوعی را پایین میداند و نگرانی اصلی او مربوط به نسلهای آینده و ظهور ابرهوش از…
✔️ شرکت OpenAI مدعی حل یکی از بزرگترین مسائل حلنشده ریاضیات شد
شرکت OpenAI اعلام کرده مدل نسل بعدی و هنوز منتشرنشده این شرکت، موفق به ارائه راهحلی برای مسئله وجود و همواری ناویر–استوکس شده؛ یکی از هفت «مسئله هزاره» که برای حل هرکدام جایزه ۱ میلیون دلاری در نظر گرفته شده است.
طبق اعلام OpenAI، حدود ۱۰ هزار Agent هوش مصنوعی بهصورت هماهنگ روی این مسئله کار کردند و پس از تنها ۸۸ ساعت به راهحل رسیدند.
نتیجه، یک اث…
✔️ مدل GPT-6 Astra معرفی شد ؛ قدرتمندترین مدل OpenAI تا امروز!
▪️شرکت OpenAI از GPT-6 Astra رونمایی کرد؛ مدلی که به گفته این شرکت، هوشمندترین و همسوترين مدلش تا امروز است و در کار با کامپیوتر، برنامه نویسی، تحقیق، علوم و کارهای حرفه ای عملکرد جدیدی ارائه میدهد.
▪️این مدل فقط جواب نمیده؛ میتونه کارهای چندمرحله ای رو از ابتدا تا انتها انجام بده، با نرم افزارها و مرورگر کار کنه، اسناد و فایل بسازه و حتی کارهایی مثل تح…
🔥 تلگرام اجرای بات بدون نیاز به سرور را ممکن کرد
تلگرام قابلیت جدیدی با نام Telegram Serverless ارائه کرده که به توسعهدهندگان اجازه میدهد کد بکاند باتهای خود را مستقیماً روی زیرساخت تلگرام اجرا کنند؛ بدون نیاز به خرید VPS، مدیریت سرور یا تنظیم دستی Webhook.
این سرویس از نظر ایده مشابه پلتفرمهایی مانند Cloudflare Workers است. کد هر بات در یک محیط ایزوله مبتنی بر V8 اجرا میشود و تلگرام مدیریت زیرساخت و اجرای آن…
✔️ جنسن هوانگ: برای بسیاری از وظایف، میتوان گفت به AGI رسیدهایم
«جنسن هوانگ»، مدیرعامل انویدیا، بار دیگر درباره رسیدن هوش مصنوعی به سطح AGI صحبت کرده و میگوید برای بسیاری از وظایف، میتوان گفت این نقطه همین حالا محقق شده است.
هوانگ در تماس مالی اخیر انویدیا گفت تمرکز روی نقطهای مشخص با عنوان «دستیابی به AGI» چندان معنادار نیست؛ زیرا تعریف و معیار واحدی برای هوش عمومی مصنوعی وجود ندارد.
به گفته او، اتفاق مهمتر…
✔️ معرفی Qwen3.8-27B OBLITERATED
اگه دنبال یه مدل لوکال قوی، آزاد و بدون محدودیتهای رایج مدلهای چتی هستید، این مدل واقعاً جالبه.
Qwen3.8-27B-OBLITERATED
نسخهای از Qwen3.8-27B که گاردریلهای ایمنی و رفتارهای Refusal ازش حذف شده؛ یعنی برخلاف خیلی از مدلها، روی خیلی از درخواستهایی که نسخه اصلی رد میکنه، مستقیم جواب میده و کمتر وارد جوابهای کلیشهای و محدودکننده میشه.
• حدود 28 میلیارد پارامتر
• مناسب اجرای ل…
👍8❤1
Signed YOUSEF
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @Kaliboys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Λ/Organizaτiοn @AOrgan · 47,423 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 August 2026
برنامه نویسی | Programming @Azad_Developers · 38,117 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
Computer Science | علم کامپیوتر @Computer_Science100 · 46,892 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
تولید محتوا |هوش مصنوعی| زنگ دانش @zangedanesh · 59,398 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
ترفند آموزش تکنولوژی و فناوری @CEngineer93 · 101,264 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
خانه موبایل و کامپیوتر @PcAndMob · 24,641 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 September 2026
کالی لینوکس | Kali linux | ترفند | کامپیوتر | تکنولوژی @kali_linuxxx · 75,988 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 August 2026
مای سکیور | Mysecure @mysecure1 · 29,944 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
مهندسی کامپیوتر @maghalecomputer · 60,326 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Black Security Team @Black_Security · 63,929 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 August 2026
آموزش برنامه نویسی و هوشمصنوعی | Max academy @max_academy · 70,407 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Computer Help @P30_H3LP · 25,284 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 September 2026
‹ NetWork & Security › @DrSecCom · 36,720 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 1 September 2026
کتابخانه انگلیسی من🎧😍 @EnglishAudioLibrary · 41,805 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
لذت الکترونیک @elecz · 52,577 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 24 August 2026
آموزش کامپیوتر | رفع مشکلات کامپیوتری @tamirpc_com · 23,001 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 September 2026
کافه مهندس @cofeeng · 113,397 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
Computer & IT Engineering @Computer_IT_Engineering · 188,764 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
جزوه بازان | JozveBazan @jozve_bazan · 24,875 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
Full Package | فول پکیج @FullPackage · 28,697 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
آموزش نوین مقاله نویسی با هوش مصنوعی @tephd · 77,186 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
مرکز آموزش کامپیوتر @AmoozeshWebsite · 96,189 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 August 2026
دنیای علم و تکنولوژی @Tech_Sci · 35,989 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
آموزشهای کامپیوتر و موبایل @Pc_IT_Mob · 90,996 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 85 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کالی بویز | ترفند | تکنولوژی” (@Kaliboys), 28,778 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kaliboys.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.