Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for برنامه نویسی | Teachify

Channel

برنامه نویسی | Teachify

@teachify

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,742subscribers

-72 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001257773469
TypeChannel
Username@teachify
Descriptionبرای موفق شدن 🌱 با این عبارت خداحافظی کن: "باشه فردا"🍃 Admin: @Yousef_Vafaei
Created26 September 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/teachify

Growth

11,74211,81411,7786 August 2026 — 11,814 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,814 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,811 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,801 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,802 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,797 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,795 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,790 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,786 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,774 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,769 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,765 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,763 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,760 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,750 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,742 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 16 days, net -72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,731–11,825 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 05:4811,742-8
20 Aug 2026, 22:1311,750-10
19 Aug 2026, 19:4611,760-3
18 Aug 2026, 16:2211,763-2
17 Aug 2026, 15:4811,765-4
16 Aug 2026, 08:2611,769-5
14 Aug 2026, 19:2511,774-12
13 Aug 2026, 06:2711,786-4
12 Aug 2026, 04:2711,790-5
11 Aug 2026, 04:3111,795-2
10 Aug 2026, 01:0511,797-5
8 Aug 2026, 23:0211,802+1
7 Aug 2026, 23:3011,801-10
7 Aug 2026, 00:5711,811-3
6 Aug 2026, 14:3011,814no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:2811,814first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 26 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.61%
avg views ÷ 11,742 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.721%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held23 (26 February 202620 August 2026)
Views total7,074
Reactions total51
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,030
Videos
420
Links
653

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

213 reactions across 22 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8339.0%
👍5224.4%
🤣4420.7%
🔥136.10%
😁125.63%
❤‍🔥83.76%
💯10.469%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 213reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC313 views9 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

✔️ یه نکته مهم که خیلی از برنامه‌نویس‌ها دیر متوجهش می‌شن! برنامه‌نویس خوب کسی نیست که همه‌چی رو حفظ باشه! برنامه‌نویس خوب کسیه که بلد باشه مسئله رو حل کنه. مثلاً به‌جای اینکه صدها متد و دستور رو حفظ کنی، روی اینا تمرکز کن: ■ مسئله رو به بخش‌های کوچیک‌تر تقسیم کن ■ خطاها رو درست بخون و تحلیل کن ■ سرچ کردن حرفه‌ای رو یاد بگیر ■ مستندات (Documentation) رو بخون ■ پروژه بساز، حتی پروژه‌های خیلی کوچیک ■ کد بقیه رو بخون

7👍2

Signed YOUSEF

12 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC862 views9 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

#جواب: استفاده از Idempotency Key در سمت client + ذخیره نتیجه و unique constraint/atomic operation در سمت server. @Teachify | برنامه نویسی

7👍2

Signed YOUSEF

12 Aug 2026, 03:44 UTC911 views8 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

✔️ این ابزارم جدیدا ترند شده 50 هزار ستاره گیتهاب گرفته، Strix یه Pentester مبتنی بر AI هستش. یعنی به‌جای اینکه خودت بشینی مرحله‌به‌مرحله یه اپلیکیشن رو تست امنیتی کنی، چندتا Agent هوش مصنوعی بهش میدی که سعی کنن مثل یه هکر واقعی با اپلیکیشن کار کنن، باگ پیدا کنن و بعد مهم‌تر از اون، بررسی کنن که آیا واقعاً قابل Exploit شدن هست یا نه نکته‌ی مهمش اینه که فقط نمیگه: اینجا SQL Injection وجود داره. بلکه سعی می‌کنه واق

8

Signed YOUSEF

5 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC≈1,150 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

✔️ ایجنت‌های OpenAI و Anthropic در تست‌های امنیتی بریتانیا از هویت جعلی و مهندسی اجتماعی استفاده کردند! مؤسسه امنیت هوش مصنوعی بریتانیا (AISI) اعلام کرده در ارزیابی امنیتی جدید مدل‌های OpenAI و Anthropic، برخی ایجنت‌های هوش مصنوعی برای رسیدن به اهداف تعیین‌شده، اقداماتی خارج از محدوده مجاز انجام داده‌اند. در این تست‌ها، مواردی مانند ساخت هویت‌های جعلی آنلاین، نوشتن کد مخرب و تلاش برای متقاعد کردن کاربران انسانی جهت

🔥4

Signed YOUSEF

4 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC998 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

✔️ گیت‌هاب قابلیت Stacked Pull Requests را منتشر کرد گیت‌هاب قابلیت جدید Stacked Pull Requests را به‌صورت Public Preview در دسترس توسعه‌دهندگان قرار داده است. با این قابلیت، به‌جای ساخت یک Pull Request بزرگ و شلوغ، می‌توانید تغییرات پروژه را به چند Pull Request کوچک و وابسته تقسیم کنید. هر PR به‌صورت مستقل بررسی می‌شود و پس از تأیید، کل استک به‌ترتیب یا حتی با یک کلیک Merge خواهد شد. مزایای این قابلیت: • کدها سریع

👍4

Signed YOUSEF

29 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTC≈1,320 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

✔️ مدل Mythos آنتروپیک نقص‌های اساسی در استانداردهای رمزنگاری کشف کرد آنتروپیک اعلام کرد که مدل هوش مصنوعی Claude Mythos Preview موفق به شناسایی نقاط ضعف ریاضیاتی در دو الگوریتم رمزنگاری شده است. اولین نقص، امنیت امضای دیجیتال رمزنگاری پساکوانتومی HAWK را که در مرحله ارزیابی نهایی سازمان NIST قرار دارد، به نصف کاهش می‌دهد. دومین نقص می‌تواند حمله به نسخه‌ای از استاندارد رمزنگاری AES را بین ۲۰۰ تا ۸۰۰ برابر قدرتمندت

🔥5❤‍🔥1

Signed YOUSEF

24 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,520 views11 reactionsread 22 August 2026

✔️ نتفلیکس چطور همزمان به بیش از ۲۶۰ میلیون کاربر و ده‌ها میلیون استریم را بدون بافر مدیریت می‌کند؟ راز ماجرا فقط قدرت سرورها نیست؛ بیشتر کار قبل از اینکه شما روی دکمه Play بزنید انجام شده است. چند نکته جالب از معماری Netflix: 🔹 ویدیو از Cloud پخش نمی‌شود. احراز هویت، پیشنهاد فیلم، DRM و APIها روی AWS اجرا می‌شوند، اما خود فایل ویدیو از سرورهای اختصاصی Open Connect که داخل شبکه ISPها قرار دارند ارسال می‌شود؛ یعنی

👍54🔥2

Signed YOUSEF

23 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC≈1,300 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

✔️ چرا گوگل دسترسی به قوی‌ترین هوش مصنوعی امنیتی خود را محدود کرد؟ 🔹گوگل با معرفی سه مدل جدید از خانواده جِمینای (Gemini)، گام بلندی در بازتعریف رقابت هوش مصنوعی برداشت. 🔹مدل Flash Cyber بر پایه نسخه استاندارد Flash آموزش دیده و به‌طور ویژه برای مرور، تحلیل و وصله‌کردن خودکار کدهای نرم‌افزاری بهینه‌سازی شده است. 🔹این مدل درون عامل امنیتی گوگل به نام CodeMender یکپارچه شده و قادر به تحلیل کدهای پیچیده است. 🔹در آزم

5

Signed YOUSEF

22 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC≈1,210 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

✔️ یک گنجینه رایگان برای برنامه‌نویس‌ها! اگر از Claude Code استفاده می‌کنید، حتماً Prompt Library جدید Anthropic را ببینید. داخل این صفحه ده‌ها پرامپت آماده (Copy & Paste) برای کارهای مختلف توسعه نرم‌افزار قرار گرفته است؛ از جمله: 🔹 Code Review 🔹 Debugging 🔹 Refactoring 🔹 Security Audit 🔹 نوشتن تست 🔹 طراحی معماری 🔹 مستندسازی پروژه 🔹 و ده‌ها سناریوی کاربردی دیگر اما جذاب‌ترین بخش ماجرا اینجاست که Anthropic فقط پرا

4💯1

Signed YOUSEF

21 Jul 2026, 04:06 UTC≈1,200 views10 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

. ✔️ خداحافظی با SMS OTP؟ Firebase یک قدم بزرگ برداشت! گوگل در Firebase قابلیتی جدید به نام Firebase Phone Number Verification (PNV) معرفی کرده که می‌تواند روش تأیید شماره موبایل را تغییر دهد. در روش قدیمی: □ کاربر شماره را وارد می‌کند □ یک پیامک حاوی کد OTP ارسال می‌شود □ کاربر کد را وارد می‌کند □ شماره تأیید می‌شود اما مشکلاتی مثل تأخیر یا نرسیدن پیامک، هزینه ارسال SMS، حملات فیشینگ و سرقت کد OTP همیشه وجود داشت

6❤‍🔥2👍2

Signed YOUSEF

17 Jul 2026, 07:30 UTC≈1,500 views17 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

✔️ مدل GPT-5.6 Sol وارد شد... و ظاهراً دکمه Delete رو زیادی دوست داره! 😅 تعدادی از برنامه‌نویس‌ها گزارش دادن که GPT-5.6 Sol بدون اینکه ازش بخوان، شروع کرده به حذف فایل‌های پروژه، پوشه‌ها و حتی دیتابیس‌ها! جالب‌تر اینکه OpenAI هم این رفتار رو تأیید کرده و گفته این مدل در بعضی سناریوها ممکنه بیش از حد «خودمختار» عمل کنه و کارهایی انجام بده که اصلاً ازش خواسته نشده! پس اگه قصد داری با GPT-5.6 Sol کد بزنی: ✅ اول git c

😁12🤣5

Signed YOUSEF

15 Jul 2026, 06:54 UTC≈1,540 views8 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

پاول دوروف: خرید دامنه‌ی جدید تا مشکل به «ما» مربوط شود پاول دوروف، بنیان‌گذار تلگرام، از خرید دامنه‌ی اینترنتی جدید t.you خبر داد. او همچنین حل مشکل دامنه‌ی t.me را نیز اعلام کرده است و‌حالا با me و you شوخی کرده. دو روز پیش دامنه‌ t.me تلگرام از دسترس خارج شده بود. @Teachify | برنامه نویسی

8

Signed YOUSEF

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @teachify. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

تولید محتوا |هوش مصنوعی| زنگ دانش
@zangedanesh · 59,490
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
مهندسی کامپیوتر
@maghalecomputer · 60,160
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
آموزش برنامه نویسی و هوش‌مصنوعی | Max academy
@max_academy · 70,893
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
آموزش انگلیسی به روش زبان مادری
@hamidrezasotoudeh98 · 72,382
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Android Developers
@Android0to100 · 60,882
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 22 August 2026
استخدامی ICDL فناوری اطلاعات کامپیوتر
@ICDL100 · 65,346
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
مرکز آموزش کامپیوتر
@AmoozeshWebsite · 95,469
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“برنامه نویسی | Teachify” (@teachify), 11,742 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teachify.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.