back to max long after a bit, inval pretty close but i think odds are good we get a strong bounce from here https://x.com/owen1v9/status/2112373643988574566?s=20

Channel
1v9 factory
@i1v9factory
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,050subscribers
+209 since we began measuring on 20 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003945351502 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @i1v9factory |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/i1v9factory |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:19 | 3,050 | +7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:21 | 3,043 | +5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:09 | 3,038 | +129 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:26 | 2,909 | +36 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:29 | 2,873 | +30 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 04:00 | 2,843 | +2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:22 | 2,841 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 62.6%
- avg views ÷ 3,050 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,910
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 October 2026 – 20 October 2026) |
| Views total | 38,203 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Oct 2026, 03:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
so yeah, gonna bid some here and see how it plays out. think a daily close below 4.4 would invalidate the trade, at which point id just take the loss will update if anything changes
also mert getting involved is another nice addition to the thesis imo. having someone like him on board is a pretty big deal
i think the trade here is betting on the HLs continuing to hold and btc defending the 81k area, ideally setting up a run towards 8-12 if btc loses 80k, no matter how strong NEAR has been, it'll probably start showing weakness too and break down below the range, which would obviously invalidate the trade
absolutely zero signs of weakness all the other leaders ZEC, HYPE, LIT, VVV, PUMP have shown some form of weakness, whether its weekly/monthly bear divs or, in LIT's case, a failed ATH breakout, leading to 30-50% corrections but NEAR is just ridiculous. genuinely cant find a single angle to attack this chart and make it look bad
while everything else has been bleeding for the past two weeks, near has just been ranging and even managed to put in a HL within the range on the daily
weekly log chart is just insane
been going through the charts and i think NEAR is one of the best looking ones out there rn
another sweep of the 81k's today. this level is holding up insanely well, just sucks that alts keep bleeding hard through all these failed breakdown attempts hopefully btc can finally resolve to the upside over the next few days
missed the entire shitshow the market went through over the past 15 hours as for perps, still sitting in my monad long, currently down 3-4%. absolute garbage coin ngl, kinda regret longing it but whatever, at least i managed to dodge any major losses during this latest dump a few setups are starting to take shape. gonna wait for them to develop a bit more before sharing them here
picked up some batman sub 3m when a coin is a pain in the ass to buy, the founders are personally twapping it, and its somehow still sitting below 3m, feels like one of those spots where you just have to take a position no idea if it'll actually go anywhere, but the r/r too good to ignore
still sitting pretty much at my entry after another red day where alts kept bleeding and majors pulled back another 2-3% says a lot about its relative strength and just how oversold it is gonna chill in this position for now. comfy
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @i1v9factory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“1v9 factory” (@i1v9factory), 3,050 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/i1v9factory.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.