Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KP’s Conviction

Channel

KP’s Conviction

@kpconviction

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

28,310subscribers

+7,992 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003559714661
TypeChannel
Username@kpconviction
DescriptionLive trading journal. ⚠️ Not financial advice. All calls carry risk and can go to zero. Educational content only. DYOR. Disclaimer: https://t.me/kpconviction/330 Telegram account: @KPsConviction X: https://x.com/KPsConviction
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kpconviction

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,65129,59223,621.57 August 2026 — 20,318 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,318 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,820 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,667 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,651 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,054 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,546 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,976 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,804 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,668 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,696 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,127 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,811 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,032 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,912 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,794 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,591 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,673 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,751 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,659 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,621 subscribers29 August 2026 — 27,714 subscribers30 August 2026 — 27,910 subscribers31 August 2026 — 27,992 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,188 subscribers2 September 2026 — 28,506 subscribers3 September 2026 — 28,875 subscribers5 September 2026 — 29,576 subscribers8 September 2026 — 29,592 subscribers11 September 2026 — 28,785 subscribers13 September 2026 — 28,129 subscribers15 September 2026 — 28,495 subscribers16 September 2026 — 28,296 subscribers19 September 2026 — 28,310 subscribers28,3107 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +7,992. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,860–31,383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 02:5828,310+14
16 Sept 2026, 19:5628,296-199
15 Sept 2026, 00:3728,495+366
13 Sept 2026, 08:4028,129-656
11 Sept 2026, 11:1628,785-807
8 Sept 2026, 18:3929,592+16
5 Sept 2026, 11:2229,576+701
3 Sept 2026, 14:1528,875+369
2 Sept 2026, 09:0328,506+318
1 Sept 2026, 09:1228,188+196
31 Aug 2026, 06:5527,992+82
30 Aug 2026, 07:1327,910+196
29 Aug 2026, 08:5227,714+2,093
28 Aug 2026, 08:4825,621+1,962
27 Aug 2026, 11:0323,659+2,908
26 Aug 2026, 10:5620,751+78
25 Aug 2026, 11:2720,673+82
24 Aug 2026, 14:0520,591+797
22 Aug 2026, 22:1319,794-118
21 Aug 2026, 09:4919,912first reading

Engagement

180 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.37%
avg views ÷ 28,310 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,650
111 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
112
of 180 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 110 of 111 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held180 (3 August 202619 September 2026)
Views total294,490
Reactions total12,372
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Sept 2026, 08:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
750
Videos
106
Links
626

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 43s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19,153 reactions across 178 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7,57139.5%
🔥6,03431.5%
👍5,39928.2%
😭460.24%
😁240.125%
👏180.094%
🗿90.047%
80.042%
🆒60.031%
🤝60.031%
50.026%
💯50.026%
🤯50.026%
🍌40.021%
👌40.021%
🫡40.021%
🐳20.01%
🤩20.01%
🌚10.005%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 178 of the 180 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,153 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 180 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 179 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kpconviction. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 180 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 19 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Sept 2026, 22:57 UTC≈1,330 views143 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

Been bidding $旺柴 and it feels like a no brainer. It’s one of the most recognizable and used dog stickers/emojis on WeChat. The meme is already embedded in Chinese internet culture. FLOKI: $3.3B ATH CHEEMS: $400M ATH Baby Doge: $1.2B ATH Broccoli: $275M ATH Vita Inu: $65M ATH And the most famous WeChat dog deserves ??? I could see Unipcs and others going all in on $旺柴 0x14f6a94909c407854390aa2d2462a3095d317777

53👍47🔥43

19 Sept 2026, 22:22 UTC≈1,310 views131 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Been accumulating as much as I can of a certain coin Soon you’ll see why

🔥4644👍41

19 Sept 2026, 20:55 UTC≈1,340 views124 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Steady Then only up mode to 1B Beavers build https://x.com/Chonketha/status/2101411083474907274

50🔥38👍36

18 Sept 2026, 19:07 UTC≈2,400 views141 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuruPhoto

JUST IN: $135,000,000,000 has been added to the crypto market cap so far today. $400,000,000 in leveraged short positions have been liquidated over the past 12 hours. This comes after the SEC approved limited on-chain trading of tokenized stocks and the CFTC filing new rulemaking to regulate the crypto market. Meanwhile, the Fed is projected to raise interest rates by another 25 basis points next month. @WatcherG

60🔥45👍36

18 Sept 2026, 08:37 UTC≈3,490 views112 reactionsread 20 September 2026

“Inu” season in full force I’m max bidding the one inu in a 4T industry $AGI 0x78E35c13252836E2313208aB48F8bB07A7551a43

45🔥38👍29

18 Sept 2026, 03:04 UTC≈3,960 views118 reactionsread 20 September 2026

https://x.com/kpsconviction/status/2100782772168323266?s=46&t=5p9T6stFn9bj6JC4ZTv8OA

41🔥41👍36

17 Sept 2026, 20:53 UTC≈4,540 views126 reactionsread 20 September 2026

$BLUECHIP MEN it’s time. The biggest meme on base is only just starting https://x.com/coinbasemarkets/status/2100664285978390930?s=46&t=5p9T6stFn9bj6JC4ZTv8OA

50🔥40👍36

17 Sept 2026, 20:50 UTC≈4,510 views127 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

$AI about to secure RH listing and a new ATH smashed We in an Inu meta right now Max bidding $AGI as the low cap play Very good roi here

54🔥41👍32

17 Sept 2026, 08:45 UTC≈4,370 views7 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Been accumulating more $ARQ on dips. Pump.fun made launching a token permissionless. Why shouldn’t launching a perp market be the same? There was $6.38T in perp DEX volume last year, yet most smaller tokens still have to wait around hoping an exchange decides to give them a perp listing. Arqen is basically removing that gatekeeper. Create a maker pool, bootstrap the liquidity and give your community somewhere to

4🔥3

17 Sept 2026, 04:21 UTC≈4,420 views101 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

All in on $SUE Next up for Binance Alpha imo Bottoms in 0x2ab8a4dd2191989ac2898006df350b236d2b7777

39👍31🔥31

17 Sept 2026, 01:17 UTC≈3,990 views114 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Have been sidelined on ARC plays but gambling here Before USDC, there was Happy Coin. Back in 2016, Circle created this little character for Circle Pay, an anthropomorphic coin literally designed to make sending money feel more human and social. Then Circle went on to launch USDC in 2018, which became one of the largest stablecoins in the world. Now Circle has its own blockchain, Arc. And somehow the original Ci

47🔥36👍31

Showing the 12 most recent of 180 posts we hold for @kpconviction. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@kpconviction edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KP’s Conviction” (@kpconviction), 28,310 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kpconviction.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.