Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for №1 КАНАЛ | стиль и мода

Channel

№1 КАНАЛ | стиль и мода

@iam_alyonaa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,356subscribers

-176 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001294391560
TypeChannel
Username@iam_alyonaa
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/iam_alyonaa

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,35613,53213,4447 August 2026 — 13,532 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,532 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,531 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,528 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,522 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,513 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,507 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,498 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,506 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,502 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,501 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,517 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,519 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,500 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,492 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,483 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,466 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,463 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,462 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,458 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,450 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,444 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,436 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,426 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,413 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,400 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,383 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,361 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,360 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,358 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,359 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,356 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -176. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,330–13,558 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 13:1713,356-3
16 Sept 2026, 08:0113,359+1
14 Sept 2026, 11:2013,358-2
13 Sept 2026, 00:1813,360-1
10 Sept 2026, 23:2113,361-22
8 Sept 2026, 02:3813,383-17
5 Sept 2026, 02:1613,400-13
3 Sept 2026, 09:4813,413-13
2 Sept 2026, 00:5413,426-10
1 Sept 2026, 04:1313,436-8
31 Aug 2026, 01:0613,444-6
29 Aug 2026, 23:5413,450-8
29 Aug 2026, 01:5813,458-4
28 Aug 2026, 03:4613,462-1
27 Aug 2026, 05:1213,463-3
26 Aug 2026, 01:3913,466-17
25 Aug 2026, 04:1813,483-9
23 Aug 2026, 22:4913,492-8
22 Aug 2026, 06:2513,500-19
20 Aug 2026, 19:2813,519first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.39%
avg views ÷ 13,356 subscribers
Avg views / post
453
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held20 (27 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total1,358
Reactions total75
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

706 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33547.5%
👍10615.0%
🔥7310.3%
🤣385.38%
custom 5420361174090797833334.67%
custom 5453888848444558155314.39%
😁263.68%
🥰233.26%
💯162.27%
💋70.992%
🙏70.992%
👏50.708%
🤓30.425%
🐳10.142%
😇10.142%
🙈10.142%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 706 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:35 UTC221 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Недавно посчитала, во сколько одна и та же сумка обошлась бы в ЦУМе и напрямую из Европы. Разница около 30–40%. Вика уже 8 лет выкупает вещи напрямую из Европы – от Hermès до брендов на каждый день. Цена известна сразу, есть подтверждение покупки, а крупные суммы можно оформить в беспроцентную рассрочку на 3–5 месяцев. А еще Вика регулярно ездит в европейские аутлеты. Недавно показывала находки из Gucci – по ценам,

6👍4🔥2🥰2

2 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC307 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

два скрина из запрещённой сети - слева Celine, справа Love Republic совпадение? ну конечно 😌

custom 545388884844455815513😁97🔥1🥰1

30 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC830 views30 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

давайте собирать осенний гардероб🍂 каждую осень с особым интересом жду новинки и кампейны LIME. у бренда всегда много актуальных и красивых вещей, перед которыми сложно устоять 👩 поэтому показываю, что уже добавила в свою корзину: 1⃣ куртка под кожу - плотная и тяжёлая, зато отлично держит форму. в талии можно затянуть 2⃣ легинсы на мои 165 см они наконец-то не свисают грустной тряпочкой 😭 3⃣ сумка аналог Celine

17custom 54203611740907978337🔥6

24 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC≈1,630 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

похоже, у красной кепки появилась серьёзная конкурентка 👩 Befree в этот раз очень хорошо попали в тренд, синяя кепка выглядит прям огонь (и цена, кстати, тоже приятная) ссылка: кепка

12👍6custom 54203611740907978334

23 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC≈1,550 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

оказывается, новые очки для зрения можно подобрать вообще без похода в оптику! мне понравилось, что не нужно самостоятельно разбираться с линзами: отправляешь рецепт менеджеру, выбираешь оправу, а можно вообще заказать несколько вариантов домой и спокойно примерить муж уже несколько дней носит свои новые и говорит, что очень доволен 🤩 ссылка: Оптика на носу

11🤓3🔥2👍1

21 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC≈2,430 views27 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

кажется, Chanel решил превратить покупку сумки в отдельный вид квеста, по уровню недоступности бренд уже подбирается к Hermès 🫠 но желанных вещей меньше не становится, особенно, после прихода Блази, поэтому приходится искать обходные пути. например, такие джинсы и сумки, за которыми этим летом стояли очереди, Buy Me может привезти напрямую из европейского бутика за пару дней, а иногда и за сутки. у сервиса 50+ мене

17custom 54203611740907978336👍4

20 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC≈1,530 views36 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

очень симпатично смотрятся именно вместе, получается иронично, но при этом выглядит как маленький арт-объект от Marmalato а вам что больше - яблочки или помидорки? 👩

19🔥9👍8

19 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC≈2,110 views24 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

это случилось! 🤩Zarina наконец-то выпустили свою обувь и, честно, давно пора представлены модели из натуральных материалов и искусственных. цена очень даже привлекательная, рекомендую обратить внимание ссылка на сайт: shoes

👍107🔥7

17 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈2,880 views33 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

зашла в Gloria Jeans просто посмотреть новинки, вышла с ощущением, что хочу половину коллекции💞 и вот что интересно: привычный оверсайз постепенно уступает место более собранным силуэтам. приталенные вещи, акцентные куртки, юбки, костюмные брюки, лонги, шоколадный и глубокий синий… особенно понравилось, что вещи легко сочетать друг с другом, можно купить одну рубашку и получить несколько совершенно разных образов

16🔥9👍6🥰2

17 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC≈1,770 views30 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

что носят в офис девушки с безупречным вкусом? 📱 💻 1️⃣ пиджак + мини - объёмный жакет с чёткой линией плеч и юбка по длине дресс-кода (дерзко, но не вызывающе) 2️⃣ блуза в полоску/клетку - оживляет базовый гардероб, хорошо сочетается с брюками, юбками и костюмами 3️⃣ обувь как акцент - квадратный мыс, острый треугольный носок или мюли 4️⃣ клетчатый жакет + миди - уютная классика в серых, коричневых, зелёных тонах

15🔥9custom 54538888484445581556

13 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC≈2,100 views25 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

сегодня хочу познакомить вас с каналом Вики, практикующей стилистки, которая с удовольствием погружает вас в мир стиля 💋 на своем канале она: -делится интересными вариантами стилизаций -учит выражать внутреннее через внешнее -делится гайдом по 60+ брендам на вб и 100+ локальным брендам -рассказывает про стилистические трюки/лайфхаки, о которых знают далеко не все а если вы напишите, что пришли от меня, то получите

11🔥5👍4💯3👏2

13 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,600 views30 reactionsread 19 August 2026

все-таки как велико влияние женщины на женщину. мы вдохновляем друг друга, поддерживаем и чувствуем друг друга поэтому я все больше стала любить личные каналы девушек, чей стиль и видение жизни мне близок!

13💋7🙏7custom 54538888484445581552👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iam_alyonaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

World Fashion Channel
@wfcru · 26,198
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“№1 КАНАЛ | стиль и мода” (@iam_alyonaa), 13,356 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iam_alyonaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.