Новостной канал ЦИПР. Ключевые новости из мира цифровой экономики и ИТ.
Мы в MAX: https://max.ru/icipr
Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=67373ced9d804a279bb34045®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
23 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -522. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,088–15,893 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 06:07
15,228
+47
5 Nov 2026, 04:09
15,181
-97
4 Nov 2026, 00:58
15,278
-58
3 Nov 2026, 03:05
15,336
-10
2 Nov 2026, 01:20
15,346
-1
1 Nov 2026, 02:40
15,347
-8
31 Oct 2026, 00:15
15,355
-9
29 Oct 2026, 20:39
15,364
-5
28 Oct 2026, 20:19
15,369
+14
27 Oct 2026, 16:17
15,355
+33
26 Oct 2026, 13:37
15,322
+25
25 Oct 2026, 15:55
15,297
-54
24 Oct 2026, 14:26
15,351
+4
23 Oct 2026, 15:25
15,347
+11
22 Oct 2026, 15:15
15,336
-7
21 Oct 2026, 09:48
15,343
-11
20 Oct 2026, 06:08
15,354
-2
19 Oct 2026, 03:47
15,356
-2
18 Oct 2026, 01:36
15,358
-38
17 Oct 2026, 03:19
15,396
first reading
Engagement
77 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.2%
avg views ÷ 15,228 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,860
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 77 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
77 (2 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
42,760
Reactions total
3,168
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 17:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,060
Videos
≈675
Links
≈3,930
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 44s
Average length
17s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,240 reactions across 74 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
2,675
26.1%
👍
2,656
25.9%
👏
2,523
24.6%
❤
2,368
23.1%
😱
8
0.078%
🆒
2
0.02%
🎉
2
0.02%
😍
2
0.02%
👨💻
1
0.01%
💯
1
0.01%
🙏
1
0.01%
🤩
1
0.01%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,686 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Российский рынок кибербезопасности может вырасти на 20,8% в 2026 году
Объем российского рынка информационной безопасности (ИБ) по итогам 2026 года может достичь 455,4 млрд рублей против 377,1 млрд рублей годом ранее. Такой прогноз приводят аналитики MWS Cloud. В ГК Bi.Zone ожидают более умеренный рост — на 10–15%.
Структура рынка по прогнозу MWS Cloud:
🔹 программное обеспечение — 216,5 млрд рублей
🔹 ИТ-услуги в об…
В России обсуждают возможность закупать облачные услуги через биржу
Рабочая группа «Инфраструктура и центры обработки данных (ЦОД) для ИИ» при правительственной подкомиссии по ИИ готовит предложения по изменению законов о госзакупках — 44-ФЗ и 223-ФЗ. Инициатива должна упростить и ускорить закупку облачных решений для госсектора, в том числе для объектов критической информационной инфраструктуры (КИИ).
Какие измене…
Облачных провайдеров будут проверять на надежность перед размещением данных банков
Для облачных платформ, которые используют банки и финтех-компании, разрабатывают единые критерии тестирования надежности и безопасности. Проверки будут оценивать инфраструктуру дата-центров, стабильность системы управления облаком и возможность восстановления данных после сбоев.
Какие требования предлагаются?
🔹 Размещение облачной п…
▶️ Ростелеком думает про подземный ЦОД.
Буквально пару недель назад замглавы Ростелекома Валерий Ермаков говорил о том, что нужен «ЦОД судного дня», как появилась информация об одном из вариантов. Почему «одного из»? Сейчас объясним.
Компания работает над созданием заглубленных дата-центров, о чем заявляют «Ведомости», со ссылкой на неназванного топ-менеджера. В целом, про подземные ЦОД говорят уже не первый месяц …
Минцифры начнет выдавать сертификаты подписи российского ПО в 2027 году
С 2027 года Минцифры планирует оформлять разработчикам российского программного обеспечения сертификаты подписи кода, а с 2028 года — корпоративные сертификаты безопасности.
Сертификат подписи кода позволит установить разработчика программы и проверить, изменялась ли она после выпуска. Электронная метка в установочном файле даст операционной си…
На исследования по приоритетным направлениям научно-технологического развития в России направили 556,6 млрд рублей
По итогам 2025 года внутренние затраты на исследования и разработки (ИР) по приоритетным направлениям научно-технологического развития составили 556,6 млрд рублей — 27,4% всех затрат на ИР крупных и средних организаций. Такие данные приводит Институт статистических исследований и экономики знаний НИУ ВШ…
ИИ-агенты в бизнесе: как использовать новые технологии без риска для кибербезопасности
ИИ-агенты становятся частью корпоративных процессов: они взаимодействуют с приложениями, управляют ИТ-инфраструктурой и выполняют задачи от имени сотрудников. Но вместе с ростом производительности появляются новые угрозы. О том, как защитить бизнес при внедрении агентных систем, рассказывает технический директор «Лаборатории Каспе…
Минцифры планирует ужесточить правила работы виртуальных операторов связи
В рамках реформы отрасли связи Минцифры обсуждает новые ограничения для MVNO — операторов, которые используют инфраструктуру и частоты других компаний.
Какие изменения обсуждаются?
🔹 Запрет на обслуживание объектов критической информационной инфраструктуры
🔹 Повышение отчислений в резерв универсального обслуживания с 2% до 4%
🔹 Запрет на исп…
🔥70❤28👏23👍20
Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @icipr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@icipr edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
УМНЫЙ ГОРОД @russiasmartcity · 19,278 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 October 2026
Немкин @ainemkin · 44,011 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 7 September 2026
Нецифровая экономика @antidigital · 24,481 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Ростелеком @rostelecomofficial · 23,379 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЦИПР” (@icipr), 15,228 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/icipr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.