Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for iiCaiCai(热门事件预测)

Channel

iiCaiCai(热门事件预测)

@iiCaiCai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

11subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002508679122
TypeChannel
Username@iiCaiCai
Created24 April 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/iiCaiCai

Growth

111211.57 August 2026 — 12 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11 subscribers7 August 202631 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 24 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–12 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 09:1311-1
12 Aug 2026, 05:4612no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:4612first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 24 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
360.0%
🍾120.0%
🫡120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2025 to 22 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jan 2026, 10:38 UTC22 viewsread 12 August 2026

🏆筛王活动开启中 @iiFaYan 群 1️⃣活动 转发以下内容去任何社区1次 截图+发在那个群发的提供链接 人人每天可参与5次🎲抽奖 欢迎挑战 第一种: 摇到几点 红包就是多少c 点击文字可复制 😒 😔 @iiFaYan 发言群 发言挖矿赚收益 🎲扔到多少奖励多少 2️⃣活动 邀请群老板 设置钱包 @iiPay 为管理员 由杜爷前去发188c 广播红包 成功邀请一个群老板参与来即可在群里参与 骰王活动 🎲仍到多少奖励多少U 进群参与:@iiFaYan

21 Jan 2026, 17:05 UTC16 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @iiGuanFang

PC2.0 正式上线啦!欢迎体验 @iiGaMe !

7 Oct 2025, 09:12 UTC88 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

2025年10月,中国互联网热搜榜 TOP1 是否会出现与 AI 相关的事件?

  1. A. 会82%
  2. B. 不会18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2025, 09:34 UTC117 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

在国际上合法运营的赌场中,哪座被称为“世界赌城”?

  1. 😄澳门6%
  2. 😄大西洋城0%
  3. 😄拉斯维加斯82%
  4. 😄新加坡6%
  5. 不知道6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Apr 2025, 00:15 UTC110 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

本群业务外包中 : @iiHeZuo (合作)

2🍾1🫡1

24 Apr 2025, 23:43 UTC90 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

iib将做为竞猜币 参与全世界热门事件投票竞猜! 谁将成为下一任教皇? 彼得罗·帕罗林29%1️⃣ 路易斯·安东尼奥·塔格莱19% 马泰奥·祖皮11% 彼得·埃尔多9% 皮埃尔巴蒂斯塔·皮扎巴拉7% 彼得·图克森7% 弗里多林·安邦戈·贝松古3% 让-马克·阿夫林2% 罗伯特·弗朗西斯·普雷沃斯特1% 2025年不会选出新教皇<1% 韩国下一任总统? 李在明78% 洪准杓5% 李俊硕5% 韩德洙4% 韩东勋4% 金文洙4% 安哲秀1% 尹锡烈<1% 金庆洙<1% 金东延<1% 李洛渊<1% 吴世勋<1% 金富谦<1% 俞成敏<1% 比特币24小时涨跌? 涨 32% 跌 68% 猜中方刮分未猜中方作为奖金 最大的telegram竞猜平台 投注钱包:👛iipay iitoken进行投掷

1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @iiCaiCai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Oct 2025, 09:12 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

2025年10月,中国互联网热搜榜 TOP1 是否会出现与 AI 相关的事件?

  1. A. 会82%
  2. B. 不会18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2025, 09:34 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

在国际上合法运营的赌场中,哪座被称为“世界赌城”?

  1. 😄澳门6%
  2. 😄大西洋城0%
  3. 😄拉斯维加斯82%
  4. 😄新加坡6%
  5. 不知道6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2025 to 22 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“iiCaiCai(热门事件预测)” (@iiCaiCai), 11 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iiCaiCai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.