日期: 2026年1月27日 纠纷群:iiPay®官方自由交易群 纠纷双方: 斩虎 买方 阿牛 卖方 纠纷事由:在交易中使用口令红包交易导致口令丢失 处理结果: 斩虎 买方 阿牛 卖方 各承担一半 处理思路: ①斩虎口令红包发在安全聊天里14秒内红包就领取 但是支付宝显示的是3分钟内抢光 说明口令红包在提前就被发起 然后在安全聊天发送口令 只是走个过程 ②任何一方申请口令交易另外一方都可以拒接交易,如果双发达成意愿口令交易,出现纠纷就各自承担一半 经验总结:口令红包无法正常查找口令的去向,所有杜绝口令交易,平台也不会受理口令交易相关的纠纷

Channel
iiGuanFang(官方频道)
@iiGuanFang
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
254subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002401453312 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iiGuanFang |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iiGuanFang |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 254 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 257 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:09 | 259 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 266 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 268 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 268 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 25 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 30s
- Average length
- 38s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 41.7% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2025 to 27 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 4
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iiGuanFang. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 May 2025 to 27 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
PC2.0 正式上线啦!欢迎体验 @iiGaMe !
iiPay 钱包祝大家圣诞节快乐! 🎄 感谢一路以来的支持与陪伴,愿这个圣诞节: ✨ 钱包更安全 ✨ 交易更顺畅 ✨ 好运与收益常伴 平安喜乐,万事顺意, 我们在 iiPay 与你一起迎接更精彩的明天!
🍾2❤1🍌1
用户 @pcking 提现 4368USDT 由于晚班客服审核消息太慢 刚刚才受理订单 已经正常受理了用户的正常提现! 速度太慢问题平台会及时优化 带来不良体验请谅解!188c 88c 下注记录: https://t.me/iiFaGuan/2995 下注记录:https://t.me/iiFaGuan/2995 提现反馈: https://t.me/iiFaGuan/3771
🚨【安全行动通告】 iiPay 安全风控系统持续升级, 已成功打击并清理 243 个违规协议号 ✅ 🔒 包括但不限于: • 恶意刷量 • 协议号套利 • 自动化脚本行为 • 非正常交互账户 iiPay 始终坚持: 真实用户优先|公平机制运行|生态长期可持续 👛 我们只欢迎真实玩家、真实社区、真实价值。 —— iiPay 安全风控中心
❤1
|KOC 群公告(最常用 😘) 📢【重要通知|iiPay 红包规则升级】 即日起,iiPay 红包领取已升级为【钱包等级制】👇 ❌ 机器人 / 羊毛号无法领取 ✅ 真实用户才能领到红包 📌 说明: 需完成 iiPay 钱包并达到对应等级 钱包等级越高,红包越稳定、福利越多 👉 还没升级钱包的,先把等级补上后续红包只会越来越好领
❤1👍1
iiPay 充值 / 提现系统全面升级完成! 感谢大家一直以来的反馈与支持。 针对此前部分用户遇到的 充值延迟 / 提现偶尔失败 问题, 我们已对底层系统进行了 深度重构与技术升级 🔥三大核心升级点: 链上确认加速 | 任务调度优化:到账速度平均提升 310% 异常重试机制上线:失败率下降 96% 全链路稳定性增强:并发高峰下也可保持秒级处理 目前所有充值、提现、闪兑均已恢复 稳定 · 秒级 · 零故障。 iiPay 始终致力于提供最流畅的 Telegram 内支付体验, 感谢每一位用户的信任,我们会持续把产品做到最好 如您仍遇到问题,可随时私聊官方客服 @iiSuYin (速应)
🍾1👍1
iiPay教程目录: iiPay白皮书 阶段简介 转账教程 收款教程 闪兑教程 承兑教程 充值教程 提现教程 红包教程 红包龙教程 上庄 发言奖励教程 群组部署@iipay教程 如何将群组升级为超级群组 去中心化金融 钱包等级及特权 iiToken是什么? 如何获得 如何使用 社区小游戏 Telegram 中文汉化 Telegram社区增长引擎 : iiPay 一键收藏iipay社区不迷路
👛iiPay教程目录: 钱包等级及特权 去中心化金融 ii币是什么? 👛iiPay白皮书 如何获得iib 如何使用iib 如何发送红包 如何转账 如何收款 闪兑功能 社区小游戏 红包龙教程 iiPay充值 iiPay提现 提现人民币教程 群组如何使用 @iipay教程 群组如何使用上庄发言教程 如何将群组升级为超级群组 🤖钱包机器人 : @iipay 一键收藏iipay社区不迷路
😈1
群组如何使用 @iipay 指令教程
将群组升级为超级群组
❤1
闪兑教程
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @iiGuanFang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@iiGuanFang named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“iiGuanFang(官方频道)” (@iiGuanFang), 254 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iiGuanFang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.