#رسالة_الجمعة . . . 😍💕

Channel
شفق
@iishafag
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,846subscribers
-610 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001809174082 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iishafag |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 19 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iishafag |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:02 | 28,846 | -93 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 28,939 | -59 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 28,998 | -38 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:44 | 29,036 | -34 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 29,070 | -35 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 29,105 | -50 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 29,155 | -34 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 29,189 | -24 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 29,213 | -25 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 29,238 | -24 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 29,262 | -38 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 29,300 | -23 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 29,323 | -52 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 29,375 | -28 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 29,403 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 29,413 | -14 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 29,427 | -14 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 29,441 | -15 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 29,456 | first reading |
Engagement
73 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.56%
- avg views ÷ 28,846 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,600
- 50 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 67
- of 73 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 73 (8 August 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 80,138 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Sept 2026, 12:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 7m 58s
- Average length
- 3m 59s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
#فلم_الويكند . . . مُشاهدة ممتعة ي رفاقي 😍💕 https://www.netflix.com/sa/title/81735102?s=i&trkid=264360203&vlang=ar&trg=cp
#رسالة_الصباح . . . احتياج الوناسة ⏳
#رسالة_اليوم . . . وش خطة الخميس الونيس؟😍 صدقة يومنا ⬇️ https://ehsan.sa/DonationCampaign/Details/2084202
Live stream finished (44 minutes)
Live stream started
#تمرين . . . كيف اكتشف الاحتياج واعالجه؟
#معلومة_ثمينه . . . مشاعرك بـ اصابعك 🕊️ لمن ينكسر أظفرك أو يجيك الم بـ اصبع مُعين او ينكسر اصبعك أو اي امر بالاصابع فـ اعرفي انها رسالة لكِ اشتغلي ع الشعور 💡
#رسائل_صباحيات_شفق💕🕊️ (صباح الثلاثاء الرايق 😍) رسالة اليوم..🕊️ . . . ايش الشي اللي أعاتب الناس عليه..؟ https://youtu.be/Rrk2Yaw4pTI صدقة يومنا ي رفاقي 💕 https://ehsan.sa/DonationCampaign/Details/2084202
شفق pinned «#رسالة_الشهر . . . #نية_الشهر يالله كيف ممكن انوي واخطط بـ (دبرة) يالله وش الخطط الي ح اضعها وح يتم .. تطبيقها و العمل عليها بكل استقرار ونماء بـ بركة؟ يالله وش الإلهامات واللمبات الي ح ادركها وح تسهم لي بـ تخطيط ناجح كله سعة ونماء وبكل انسجام وتناغم…»
#رسالة_الشهر . . . #نية_الشهر يالله كيف ممكن انوي واخطط بـ (دبرة) يالله وش الخطط الي ح اضعها وح يتم .. تطبيقها و العمل عليها بكل استقرار ونماء بـ بركة؟ يالله وش الإلهامات واللمبات الي ح ادركها وح تسهم لي بـ تخطيط ناجح كله سعة ونماء وبكل انسجام وتناغم معي؟ نتدبر: لا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله ودائماً وابداً عليك بالصدقة 😍💕 ⬇️ صدقتنا ي رفاقي https://ehsan.sa/DonationCampaign/Details/2084202
#رسالة_الحظة . . . ننوي نية .. (الغنى) ونستبدل شعور الاحتياج بـ (الغنى) ونؤمن بأن الله مغنينا اصلاً وأنا كل شيء مُسخر لنا بكل توازن معنا يلا نستبدل كلمة (احتاج) 😍 بـ أرغب — «أرغب في المزيد من المال.» أختار — «أختار علاقة فيها حب وتقدير.» أفضل — «أفضل أن أشعر بالتقدير.» أتطلع — «أتطلع لزيادة دخلي.» أسعى — «أسعى لبناء أمان مالي.» يسعدني — «يسعدني أن أتلقى الحب والاهتمام» أُريد — «يسعدني أن كل ما أريده يُريدني»
Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @iishafag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
امورك مدحدرة وين؟
- مع المال؟47%
- مع الجنس؟15%
- مع الأكل؟24%
- كل ما سبق مدحدر عندي؟33%
- كل ما سبق ممتاز عندي؟9%
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
أي شعور أصعب عليك تعطينه مساحة..؟
- الغضب35%
- الحزن25%
- التعلق34%
- التأنيب29%
- آخر ..شاركه ف التعليقات3%
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 4 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@lovelight3699 · 7,383#1
@walaafadel90 · 8,722#2
@i6jn8 · 9,090#3
@samas_journey_channel · 7,181#4
@sooesulsuL7777 · 2,092#5
@Alhanoufalbadri · 2,278#6
@MeAlanoud7 · 3,150#7
@myinnerverse · 5,573#8
@Raghd_369 · 19,335#9
@dr_raghad888 · 2,202 (as read 9 September 2026)#10
@undefinedyou · 11,242#11
@pleneia · 1,637#12
@Seham3369 · 4,554#13
@ocean3690 · 1,781 (as read 9 September 2026)#14
@pstt7890 · 1,658#15
@Breathing80 · 10,393#16
@miracles_space · 3,913#17
@Anaaabualfaraj · 3,823#18
@maramempowers · 2,622 (as read 9 September 2026)#19
@Alaalimitless · 1,306 (as read 9 September 2026)#20
@Lavender528 · 4,236#21
@anala_world · 1,781 (as read 9 September 2026)#22
@alkawtherriver7 · 3,974#23
@f_heart3 · 1,547#24
@coachghalia1 · 3,427#25
@ISTAR_Haifa · 594 (as read 9 September 2026)#26
@phoenixdew22 · 1,734 (as read 9 September 2026)#27
@mariamasal888 · 3,153 (as read 9 September 2026)#28
@TolifeLatifa · 1,072#29
@emansou6 · 127,330#30
@wiladajadida1111 · 1,310#31
@durrah888 · 1,427#32
@abaq001 · 1,176#33
@Najwa_light · 1,552 (as read 9 September 2026)#34
@sultanalabdullah · 984#35
@salhaaljasser · 1,113#36
@Hananaliksa · 816#37
@WA0369 · 2,516#38
@Gazellespace · 610#39
@thegurdianangel37 · 79,952#40
@atharina33 · 399#41
@avatarbluebloodline · 798#42
@SoulMashael888 · 1,522#43
@space_possibilities88 · 562 (as read 9 September 2026)#44
@almarrimona · 5,022#45
@Happ369iness · 985#46
@thegate520 · 5,779#47
@jollieange123 · 837#48
@Greenchannel_6 · 888#49
@noorkaizen · 70,285#50
@memeastrology · 2,667 (as read 9 September 2026)#51
@lina_6390 · 3,050 (as read 9 September 2026)#52
@OraclebyAMjad · 1,910#53
@HeeyYellowClearings · 2,140#54
@lovenlightrising8 · 649 (as read 9 September 2026)#55
@drAmani369 · 357#56
@sparkling_soul369 · 467#57
@Esraa_Malak · 4,368#58
@Hindlifestyles · 2,056#59
@Xavi1618 · 4,779#60
@YENIGMA · 836#61
@Abdullah2931 · 516 (as read 9 September 2026)#62
@drsumaya369 · 8,798#63
@SmartsWay · 91,567#64
@FarisEltoum · 9,226#65
@sa369f · 795#66
@manayiralrajhi · 19,570#67
@shahdaffandi · 2,149#68
@creat_your_reality · 7,656#69
@coacheman5 · 3,738#70
@afaq_369 · 1,496#71
@AbeerAlhyat · 2,090#72
@Arabic_lang_Access_Consciousness · 3,512#73
@goyogaksa · 674#74
@uranus_hani · 7,331#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@emansou6 · 127,330
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
@CoachAfaf · 35,955
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
@mariamaldakhil · 91,089
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 August 2026
@halimaalyaqeen · 37,822
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
@DrEhabHamarnehBeYou · 56,508
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شفق” (@iishafag), 28,846 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iishafag.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.