4 measurements spanning 24 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 976–987 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 00:41
977
-7
1 Sept 2026, 07:45
984
-2
18 Aug 2026, 05:32
986
no change
17 Aug 2026, 09:45
986
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.3%
avg views ÷ 977 subscribers
Avg views / post
140
1 post measured
Reaction rate
7.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
20 (13 December 2025 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
140
Reactions total
10
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
55s
Average length
55s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
574 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
478
83.3%
🙏
36
6.27%
👍
25
4.36%
👏
10
1.74%
🎉
5
0.871%
🦄
4
0.697%
🔥
3
0.523%
🥰
3
0.523%
🕊
2
0.348%
⚡
1
0.174%
❤🔥
1
0.174%
🎃
1
0.174%
👻
1
0.174%
🖕
1
0.174%
🤓
1
0.174%
🤔
1
0.174%
🤣
1
0.174%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 574 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2025 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sultanalabdullah. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 December 2025 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
سجل للمحاضرة المجانية يوم الثلاثاء
"أهلاً بك! شكراً لاهتمامك بالمحاضرة المباشرة
مع الدكتور خالد عمر دقروق. 🧠✨
فن النطق والمخاطبة
اضغط على الرابط أدناه للانضمام فوراً
لجروب الواتساب المخصص
واستلام رابط البث المباشر:
[الآن اضغط هنا: https://chat.whatsapp.com/BUcO97nVpAx4F9MMgzOz81?s=cl&p=a&mlu=4]"
العيد شعور يسكن القلب حين يمتلئ بمعنى القرب من الله 🌙✨
العيد لحظة تتذكر فيها الروح أن الأضحية كانت رمزًا عظيمًا 🐑💫
رمزًا لتقديم كل ما أثقل القلب
كل خوف قديم 🌑
كل تعلق استنزف النور
كل دورة تكررت حتى حفظها الجسد والروح
العيد عبور 🕊️
وتحرر
واتساع 🌌
وفي كل تكبيرة 📣
تولد مساحة جديدة داخل الإنسان
وفي كل دعاء 🤲
تتحرك أبواب الرحمة
وفي كل أضحية
تتحرر الروح من أحمال حملتها سنوات طويلة
عيدكم قلب يعرف الاحتفال بنعمة الله ❤️
…
تخيل نفسك تمشي بخطوات هادئة نحو بوابة العيد
كل خطوة فيها وعي وحضور.
الضوء الذي ينبعث من البوابة يلامس قلبك
يذيب أي ثقل داخلي…
ويملأك بسعادة صافية وحب عميق لنفسك وللآخرين.
كل زهرة على الطريق تبتسم لك
وكل نسمة هواء تحمل بركة وفرحًا داخليًا.
عند عبور البوابة…..تشعر بأن روحك تتوسع….تفتح أفق جديد من الصفاء والسكينة….وكأن العالم كله يشاركك فرحة هذا العيد بروح نقية وحب لا مشروط. 🎊🎊
يسرّني أن أتقدم لكم بأطيب التهاني وأصدق التبريكات بمناسبة 🎊عيد الفطر المبارك🎊
سائلًا الله أن يعيده عليكم بالصحة والعافية
وأن يجعل أيامكم مليئة بالخير والنجاح والطمأنينة والحب والسلام
كل عام وأنتم بخير
سلطان العبدالله
كل عام وانتم في نور وسلام وحب ورحمه ويقين مع الله
اقول لكم بقلب يحب لكم الخير
ان رمضان نفحة نور تتنزل على القلوب فتوقظ ما سكن وتفتح ابواب الصفاء
لمن اراد القرب✨
فيه تتطهر النيات وتلين الارواح ويستعيد القلب عهده مع الله صفاء وثقة وتسليما
ولهذا
هو شهر الرجوع الجميل شهر السكينة
الطمأنينه
التي تمشي في العروق والدعاء الذي يصعد من اعماق الصدق فيكتب له القبول بإذن الله وهذا وعد رباني
في كل ليلة
سر وفي كل
فجر وعد
و…
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
اسعد الله صباحكم بكل خير وحب وسلام ويسر ورحمه وامان
اسأل الله دائما ان تكونوا بخير دوما
فيه شخص منتحل اسمي ويدخل على الاعضاء ويقول انا سلطان العبدالله
انا لا ادخل على اي انسان ابدا خاص الا بعد الاستئذان بالقناه وامام الجميع …..✨
كونوا بأمان وحفظ الرحمن دائما
🤍🤍🤍
سلطان العبدالله
والله دمعت عيني من رسائل جتني بالخاص 😢
اللهم انك القوي العزيز
تعلم خائنة الأعين و ما تخفي الصدور …..
اللهم انت الحق وقولك الحق وتنصر المظلومين وقد حرمت الظلم على نفسك …
انصرهم يارب وخذ بيدهم وخذ حقهم فأنت حسبهم ونعم الوكيل
اقسم بمن احل القسم لو تعلمون ما اعلم
مالذي يحصل مع كل علاقه غير شرعيه
لا اعتقد ان يطري على بال شخص ان يرتكب هذا الخطأ
❤40👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sultanalabdullah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
369Flamenco @Flamenco369 · 38,412 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026
شفق @iishafag · 28,846 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
ايمان بنت سعود @emansou6 · 127,330 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
SmartsWay @SmartsWay · 91,567 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🕊️سلطان العبدالله 🕊️” (@sultanalabdullah), 977 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sultanalabdullah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.