WOW WE GOT A LIKE FROM CB_DOGE ✔️ https://x.com/martiansofmars/status/2085489473404489902
Signed IL YAS | Calls

Channel
@ilyescalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
794subscribers
+135 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001207587757 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ilyescalls |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ilyescalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 794 | +44 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 750 | +85 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 665 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 667 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 659 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 659 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
WOW WE GOT A LIKE FROM CB_DOGE ✔️ https://x.com/martiansofmars/status/2085489473404489902
Signed IL YAS | Calls
Martians Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 9.33 SOL ($682.99) 🔀 14 555 151.113 Martians 👤 CAKZmY...YnQT | Txn ⬆️ New Holder! 💸 Market Cap $44 961 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events
Signed IL YAS | Calls
Good entry for you
Signed IL YAS | Calls
Martians Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 0.198 SOL ($14.55) 🔀 401 390.687 Martians 👤 FSoiXt...jUYY | Txn ⬆️ Position: 4% Up! 💸 Market Cap $34 722 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events
Signed IL YAS | Calls
Martians Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 1 SOL ($80.13) 🔀 627 802.852 Martians 👤 BamcTP...rguQ | Txn ⬆️ New Holder! 💸 Market Cap $122 299 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events
Signed IL YAS | Calls
My goal is to+10m
Signed IL YAS | Calls
Just hit 140k but not that the goal
Signed IL YAS | Calls
GREEN LIGHT BY ELON!! DEBORAH HAS POSTED THE VIDEO SHE CREATED FOR US. ELON KNOWS ABOUT US BECAUSE IF YOU CHECK PREVIOUS PINNED, ELON HAD TO GIVE THE GREEN LIGHT. HE F**KING GAVE THE GREEN LIGHT FOR THE VIDEO TO BE POSTED! OFF TO MARS WE TO! 🚀 https://x.com/dvorahfr/status/2085083897843302895
Signed IL YAS | Calls
🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕 $1.5K MARTIANS BUY! 👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽 ➡️ SOL: 19.8 ($1.5K) ⬅️ MARTIANS: 12M 👤 Buyer / Txn 🅿️ Position: NEW 📈 Marketcap: $113K 📊Chart | 🕵️ Calls |🏆 Trending
Signed IL YAS | Calls
Martians Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 2.71 SOL ($201.62) 🔀 2 370 437.02 Martians 👤 13VK7Z...PVys | Txn ⬆️ New Holder! 💸 Market Cap $81 499 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events
Signed IL YAS | Calls
Martians Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 0.4653 SOL ($34.48) 🔀 537 048.501 Martians 👤 AvWuTX...xYZo | Txn ⬆️ Position: 51% Up! 💸 Market Cap $61 513 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events
Signed IL YAS | Calls
It’s ok you gona understand with time
Signed IL YAS | Calls
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ilyescalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ilyescalls named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ILYES Calls” (@ilyescalls), 794 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilyescalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.