Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Самозванец после Гарварда

Channel

Самозванец после Гарварда

@imposteractually

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,492subscribers

-174 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001702743666
TypeChannel
Username@imposteractually
DescriptionКанал Евгении Поповой, автора книги «Предки завещали опасаться». Здесь много интересных научных фактов из сферы когнитивистики и продуктивности в общем, а также истории из моей жизни и бизнеса. Мои продукты: https://meta-mozg.ru/eugenypopova
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/imposteractually

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,4817,6667,573.57 August 2026 — 7,666 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,665 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,658 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,646 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,640 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,628 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,622 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,607 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,602 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,595 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,594 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,587 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,570 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,545 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,533 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,515 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,508 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,503 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,498 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,494 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,493 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,490 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,481 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,492 subscribers7,4927 August 20265 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 90 days, net -174. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,453–7,694 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 17:117,492+11
2 Nov 2026, 07:407,481-9
29 Oct 2026, 22:287,490-3
27 Oct 2026, 08:377,493-1
24 Oct 2026, 10:487,494-4
21 Oct 2026, 01:067,498-5
18 Oct 2026, 07:067,503-5
15 Oct 2026, 06:567,508-7
12 Oct 2026, 08:157,515-18
5 Oct 2026, 15:157,533-12
28 Sept 2026, 08:177,545-25
18 Sept 2026, 12:577,570-17
13 Sept 2026, 23:417,587-7
10 Sept 2026, 07:407,594-1
5 Sept 2026, 01:227,595-7
1 Sept 2026, 05:147,602-5
29 Aug 2026, 10:037,607-15
26 Aug 2026, 10:397,622-6
23 Aug 2026, 21:257,628-12
16 Aug 2026, 20:377,640first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 7,492 subscribers
Avg views / post
868
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held38 (29 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total6,942
Reactions total352
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 00:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,070
Videos
≈71
Links
≈212

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,782 reactions across 37 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,03157.9%
🔥49627.8%
👍1126.29%
🥰452.53%
💯412.30%
🙏251.40%
🤩130.73%
🎉80.449%
🌚60.337%
😢30.168%
😍20.112%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,782 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 38 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @imposteractually. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 07:28 UTC514 views54 reactionsread 7 November 2026

«Умные люди очень ссыкливы» Эту фразу любит говорить мой муж. Однажды я произнесла ее вот в этом интервью (посмотрите, если не видели https://youtu.be/1bJWbCHmzo8?si=GKq2YCDgx3gteLKB), и она вызвала неожиданно бурную реакцию. Кто-то возмутился: «Ну можно же было выразиться поизящнее». А кто-то, кажется, просто узнал себя. И это интересно.. Потому что умный человек способен придумать 48 убедительных причин ничего не…

❤28💯18🔥8

22 Oct 2026, 06:43 UTC869 views68 reactionsread 7 November 2026

🌀 ЭНТЕЛЕХИЯ 🌀 Вы знаете, почему одни дела дают энергию, а другие выжимают из тебя все соки? У Аристотеля есть слово, которое этот процесс объясняет - энтелехия. Это когда ты делаешь то, для чего создан, и сам процесс уже является наградой. Не цель - она находится в будущем, а реализация потенциала - она у нас есть прямо сейчас. Если вы делаете не свое, мозг саботирует. Усталость, апатия, бесконечный поиск смысла, м…

❤40🔥19👍8😢1

20 Oct 2026, 05:59 UTC≈1,020 views56 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Немного неприятного с утра. Если вы чего-то очень хотите - а результата нет - значит, с большой долей вероятности вы этого не хотите.

❤38💯10🌚6😢2

18 Oct 2026, 12:01 UTC≈1,150 views32 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Если думаете что посмотреть - очень советую выпуск с Сэмом Харрисом. Он немного продолжает прошлый пост. И говорит о важном, а что, если большую часть нашей тревоги создают не события, а то, что мозг о них рассказывает? Он объясняет, почему мы принимаем собственные мысли за реальность и как научиться этого не делать. 3 интересные идеи из выпуска: 🟡 Большинству людей сложно удерживать внимание даже 30 секунд 😭 🟡 Мыс…

❤22👍10

18 Oct 2026, 07:09 UTC904 views58 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Знаете, что выматывает сильнее, чем неправильное решение? Отсутствие решения в принципе Я все больше убеждаюсь, что мы сильно недооцениваем, сколько энергии уходит на бесконечное обдумывание одного и того же. 🟡Уйти или остаться? 🟡Начать или подождать? 🟡Сказать или промолчать? 🟡Сделать или не сделать? И так по кругу. Неделями. Годами. В психологии это называется руминацией - когда мозг многократно прокручивает од…

❤36🔥14👍5💯3

13 Oct 2026, 15:32 UTC801 views10 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @leadership_sch

Сегодня у нас практикум по самопрезентации Он очень классный и плотный: мы соединяем в нем и тему самопрезетации, и сторителлинга Почему тема самопрезентации важна? Потому что решение о вас принимают до того, как вы начали работать. На собеседовании, на выступлении, по реплике в чате, на комитете, в первые минуты знакомства с новым руководителем, в разговоре с клиентом, который пока не знает, сколько вы стоите Мо…

❤10

10 Oct 2026, 06:56 UTC892 views43 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Все утро сегодня думаю об этом и решила с вами порассуждать о том, как легко мы начинаем глупеть, когда слишком много работаем (навеяно нашей школой лидерства, она стартовала, но еще можно присоединиться). И ведь почти никто этого не замечает. Наоборот, мы собой гордимся - 5 часов сна, 10 встреч, 100 сообщений, еще и страшно важное решение между двумя звонками приняли. Красавчики же! А теперь немного душной нейроби…

❤24🔥13👍6

9 Oct 2026, 12:39 UTC792 views31 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Посты про Кисловодск. Часть 2. Где жить? С маршрутами разобрались, теперь давайте о том, где жить в Кисловодске. Если вы хотите совместить поездку с лечением — я искренне рекомендую санаторий «Источник». Но если, санаторное лечение в ваши планы не входит, я бы советовала снимать квартиру. Приятных гостиниц, которые захотелось бы вам рекомендовать, я в Кисловодске так и не нашла. Где искать жильё? У меня для прожив…

🔥19❤9🥰3

6 Oct 2026, 15:32 UTC845 views52 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Задолжала вам посты про город моего сердца. Поэтому, делаю серию - где гулять, где жить и где вкусно есть в Кисловодске. Первый пост про мой любимый утренний маршрут по Кисловодску (там есть карта - сохраняйте) Знаете, что я люблю в Кисловодске больше всего? Здесь умеешь замедляться. Я полюбила этот город не сразу, мне помогли узнать его местные жители и прекрасная Маргарита @dobra_gora Если вдруг вам понадобиться…

❤35🔥10🥰5👍2

28 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC280 views29 reactions5 Starsread 28 August 2026

«Успех - это движение от неудачи к неудаче без потери энтузиазма» - Уинстон Черчилль 💭 и кто из нас так действительно умеет?

🔥27👍2

27 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC350 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @leadership_schPhoto

Мы открыли продажи в осенний набор Школы лидерства Рассказываем о Школе на карточках Детальная программа, расписание, тарифы – на нашем сайте

❤6🔥3👍1

27 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC345 viewsread 28 August 2026

Маша сделала такие красивые карточки для школы, что я не могу молчать!

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @imposteractually. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Самозванец после Гарварда” (@imposteractually), 7,492 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imposteractually.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.