Channel
@kroyka_future
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
710subscribers
+122 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004379498249 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kroyka_future |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 1 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kroyka_future |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 710 | +2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 708 | +17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 691 | +19 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 672 | +21 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 651 | +63 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 588 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 588 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
53 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 41.5% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 34.0% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 24.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Будущее. Просто будущее 😁🫶🏻 Thought-to-text Бывшая сотрудница OpenAI перешла в стартап conduit, чтобы строить "телепатию": модели преобразования мыслей в текст, обученные на неинвазивных нейронных данных Ее прогноз – через пару лет основным способом общения с нашими ИИ будут наши мысли. Они не будут сверхумными автоматизированными стажерами или коллегами, за которыми вы отчаянно пытаетесь угнаться. Они будут естест…
👍4❤3
Благодаря ИИ мы постоянно узнаем, что мир переполнен простыми людьми, все как-то нелепо косячат :)) ПвК уличили в публикации четырёх экспертно-аналитических отчётов об ИИ, которые были переполнены ссылками-глюками, выдуманными утверждениями и тп, аж фреймворк нагалюцинировали Прелесть! 〰️ Сигналы бытия
🔥7❤4
Харари и ИИ Часть 2 (7) Kill Switch – беспрецедентная власть ИИ над суверенитетом - Можно создать систему, где всё работает на инфраструктуре ИИ по всему миру, но в имперском центре есть «выключатель» – римляне продавали мечи готам и готы могли потом сражаться этими мечами с римлянами (современный пример – Старлинк, который может быть для кого-то выключен) - Единственный выбор – стать ли вам покорным вассалом импе…
❤6👍3
Харари и ИИ Я не люблю Харари, потому как от него как будто веет нелюбовью к человечеству, но он распространяет определенное облако тегов. Напомню, что Харари буквально с первой книги говорит нам, что "Люди живут не на истине, а на общих историях, и тот, кто контролирует историю, контролирует вид" Давайте посмотрим, что сказал на Гала ужине журналисту Тому Паркеру (1) Когнитивная революция - Люди приобретают спос…
🔥3❤1
📌 Дайджест Сигналов бытия, Неделя 6 В аудио – подкаст о том, какие материалы выходили на этой неделе Доступна скорость 2х Будущее совместной работы и мышления - Офис – это машина для совместной работы, и её прототип – индейская землянка - Co-thinking: мы думаем не только головой, но и досками, стенами и вещами вокруг Будущее с ИИ – честное и не очень 😁 - Y Combinator поставили физические стенды с ИИ-аватарами, и л…
❤3👍2
А давайте просто как бы в шутку посмотрим на символизм в отчете Маккинзи, на каком-то скромном уровне. Пусть мы вообще во всем ошибемся, но у нас настолько мозги зашоренные, что полезно хотя бы чутка по сторонам качаться :) все это просто фантазия!! Погнали, для удобства выше - все картинки из отчета (1) Где люди? Взрослые люди в трудовой роли появляются ровно один раз – в машинном зале из семидесятых. В настоящем…
❤5🔥4👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
McKinsey выпустили 250-годовой отчет Америки – At 250, sustaining America’s competitive edge Таких комплиментарных отчетов еще поискать :) Но общий вайб почему-то – дека на столе у инвесторов, когда надо попросить еще денег Некоторые графики на скрине, пара тезисов ниже, пдфка в первом комментарии - США в свои 250 лет – самая конкурентоспособная экономика мира (4% населения → 26% мирового ВВП, 59 из топ-100 компан…
🔥4👍2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @kroyka_future. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сигналы бытия” (@kroyka_future), 710 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kroyka_future.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.