We are committed to bringing unbiased and accurate news to the people of Myanmar. We believe in freedom of speech, freedom of expression and freedom of thought. We will always strive to ensure the people’s right to information.
www.hlaing.info
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
28 measurements spanning 28 days, net -962. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,418–50,668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 14:57
49,562
-15
3 Sept 2026, 01:28
49,577
-39
2 Sept 2026, 01:24
49,616
-43
1 Sept 2026, 00:16
49,659
-50
30 Aug 2026, 22:03
49,709
-33
30 Aug 2026, 00:14
49,742
-51
29 Aug 2026, 00:55
49,793
-18
28 Aug 2026, 04:15
49,811
-31
27 Aug 2026, 02:53
49,842
-26
26 Aug 2026, 00:54
49,868
-35
25 Aug 2026, 04:11
49,903
-34
23 Aug 2026, 22:24
49,937
-64
22 Aug 2026, 08:36
50,001
-12
20 Aug 2026, 20:46
50,013
-13
19 Aug 2026, 22:35
50,026
-20
18 Aug 2026, 19:25
50,046
-34
17 Aug 2026, 20:15
50,080
-51
16 Aug 2026, 20:05
50,131
-69
15 Aug 2026, 06:05
50,200
-57
14 Aug 2026, 00:15
50,257
first reading
Engagement
880 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.20%
avg views ÷ 49,562 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,580
875 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
880
of 880 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 873 of 875 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held
880 (7 August 2026 – 4 September 2026)
Views total
1,385,962
Reactions total
37,478
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Sept 2026, 20:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈147,000
Videos
≈6,000
Links
≈14,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
10m 22s
Average length
1m 44s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
37,478 reactions across 871 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
9,766
26.1%
🤬
8,808
23.5%
👍
8,236
22.0%
😢
2,911
7.77%
😁
2,574
6.87%
🔥
2,157
5.76%
👏
1,564
4.17%
👎
755
2.01%
🥰
367
0.979%
😱
263
0.702%
🤔
76
0.203%
🤯
1
0.003%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 873 of the 880 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,478 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 880 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Showing the 12 most recent of 880 posts we hold for @infohlaing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Shwe Moe @mashwemoe · 53,976 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
ပန်ဆယ်လို @pencilochannel · 154,010 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
Zin Thaw Naing @zinthawnaing · 53,171 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
CDM ဆိတ်ဖွား @doctorseakphwa · 42,313 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
စစ်ခွေးသင်္ချိုင်း @SittKhwayDead · 68,172 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 20 August 2026
မြေလတ်အသံ - Myaelatt Athan @myaelattathan · 36,266 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
People's Spring @PeopleSpring · 60,107 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
Khit Thit Media @khitthitnews · 356,535 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 11 August 2026
သတင်းမှန် ဖိုးစီ @mmtruthnews · 114,162 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 August 2026
The Irrawaddy - Burmese @theirrawaddy · 76,753 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
Shwe Phee Myay News Agency @spmnewsagency2019 · 38,839 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 31 August 2026
MMWeather @mmweather · 44,316 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
Myanmar Now @MyanmarNowNews · 49,686 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
VOA Burmese @burmesevoanews · 36,284 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 1 September 2026
Mizzima @mizzimatv · 49,599 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
DVB TV News @dvbtvnews · 41,333 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
RFA Burmese @rfaburmeseofficial · 45,623 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
Mratt's Channel @mrattkyawthu · 75,618 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 August 2026
Wai Hin (ဝေဟင်) @WaiHin · 48,839 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
Khit Thit Media ခေတ်သစ်မီဒီယာ @khitthitmedianews · 105,013 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 August 2026
BBC News မြန်မာ @bbcnewsburmese · 40,646 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
AA Info Desk @aainfodesk · 45,653 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
K S News @kyawswar49111 · 133,339 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
Gold Price & Exchange Rate Channel @gdbprice · 42,954 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hlaing Info” (@infohlaing), 49,562 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infohlaing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.