Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Instagram recovery

Channel

Instagram recovery

@instagram_recovery2

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

30,049subscribers

-1,752 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003292972859
TypeChannel
Username@instagram_recovery2
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 28 February 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/instagram_recovery2

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@instagram_recovery2/312 · this entry24 Apr 2026, 14:54 UTC@hackerc/31224 Apr 2026, 14:54 UTC1.00under a minute
@instagram_recovery2/315 · this entry26 Apr 2026, 07:30 UTC@hackerc/31526 Apr 2026, 07:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@instagram_recovery2/316 · this entry26 Apr 2026, 20:13 UTC@hackerc/31626 Apr 2026, 20:13 UTC1.00under a minute
@instagram_recovery2/319 · this entry28 Apr 2026, 13:00 UTC@hackerc/31928 Apr 2026, 13:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@instagram_recovery2/320 · this entry29 Apr 2026, 01:17 UTC@hackerc/32029 Apr 2026, 01:17 UTC1.00under a minute
@instagram_recovery2/322 · this entry30 Apr 2026, 05:32 UTC@hackerc/32230 Apr 2026, 05:32 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@hackerc8 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minuteeven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 11 comparable posts for this entry, running 24 April 2026 to 1 May 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @instagram_recovery2 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

30,04931,80130,9257 August 2026 — 31,801 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,801 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,787 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,742 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,667 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,627 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,573 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,501 subscribers14 August 2026 — 31,438 subscribers16 August 2026 — 31,376 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,320 subscribers18 August 2026 — 31,272 subscribers19 August 2026 — 31,242 subscribers20 August 2026 — 31,179 subscribers22 August 2026 — 31,141 subscribers23 August 2026 — 31,075 subscribers25 August 2026 — 31,018 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,987 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,962 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,943 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,918 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,868 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,852 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,799 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,754 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,693 subscribers4 September 2026 — 30,627 subscribers7 September 2026 — 30,472 subscribers10 September 2026 — 30,309 subscribers12 September 2026 — 30,209 subscribers14 September 2026 — 30,139 subscribers16 September 2026 — 30,105 subscribers18 September 2026 — 30,049 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -1,752. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,786–32,064 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 02:2030,049-56
16 Sept 2026, 00:4030,105-34
14 Sept 2026, 09:1730,139-70
12 Sept 2026, 17:5530,209-100
10 Sept 2026, 19:3730,309-163
7 Sept 2026, 15:5530,472-155
4 Sept 2026, 16:1430,627-66
2 Sept 2026, 23:5530,693-61
1 Sept 2026, 23:3630,754-45
1 Sept 2026, 00:0630,799-53
30 Aug 2026, 20:3430,852-16
29 Aug 2026, 23:5530,868-50
29 Aug 2026, 03:2830,918-25
28 Aug 2026, 00:1730,943-19
27 Aug 2026, 00:1230,962-25
26 Aug 2026, 02:2930,987-31
25 Aug 2026, 04:0731,018-57
23 Aug 2026, 19:5931,075-66
22 Aug 2026, 07:0631,141-38
20 Aug 2026, 23:4431,179first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
114
Videos
5
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

302 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6822.5%
💯5718.9%
👍4916.2%
🎉4514.9%
👏4414.6%
🔥3812.6%
😁10.331%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 302 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 1 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 May 2026, 20:48 UTC≈3,020 views10 reactionsread 24 September 2026

For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire…

❤9😁1

1 May 2026, 20:48 UTC≈2,600 viewsread 24 September 2026

For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire…

1 May 2026, 20:48 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 24 September 2026

For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire…

1 May 2026, 20:48 UTC990 viewsread 24 September 2026

For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire_Expert For more details http://T.me/Hire…

1 May 2026, 08:31 UTC756 views21 reactionsread 24 September 2026

🚨 ALERT: 500+ Ethereum wallets drained after years of dormancy, $800K stolen and laundered via ThorChain.

❤4🎉4👏4👍3💯3🔥3

30 Apr 2026, 20:13 UTC791 views21 reactionsread 24 September 2026

🚀 Top Trending Coins (Today) 1. MEGA 2. ACN 3. LUNC 4. PENGU 5. AI 6. TAO 7. BIO 8. MON 9. BTC 10. ZEC 11. CHIP 12. APE 13. AERO 14. PLUME 15. SOL

❤7👏5🔥3🎉2👍2💯2

30 Apr 2026, 05:32 UTC699 views22 reactionsread 24 September 2026

🟠 Bitcoin ETF Inflow : 2026-04-29 #IBIT : -$54.7M #FBTC : -$36.1M #ARKB : -$30.0M #EZBC : -$6.5M #GBTC : -$21.1M 📊 Net Inflow : -$148.4M ⚡ 7-day Avg : $5.9M @ETF_FLOWS

🎉5👍4💯4🔥4👏3❤2

29 Apr 2026, 14:08 UTC684 views21 reactionsread 24 September 2026

JUST IN: 💰 Visa adds Polygon to its global stablecoin settlement program.

❤5👍5🔥4💯3🎉2👏2

29 Apr 2026, 01:17 UTC717 views23 reactionsread 24 September 2026

JUST IN : 🇺🇸 U.S. intelligence agencies are studying how Iran would respond if Trump declare a unilateral victory against Iran, and potentially pull back from the war.

🔥6❤5👍5💯3🎉2👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @instagram_recovery2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Instagram recovery” (@instagram_recovery2), 30,049 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/instagram_recovery2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.