Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for dev.insuline.eth

Channel

dev.insuline.eth

@insuline_eth

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,201subscribers

+99 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001383330067
TypeChannel
Username@insuline_eth
Created5 November 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/insuline_eth

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,0928,2018,146.56 August 2026 — 8,102 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,101 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,092 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,140 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,134 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,137 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,131 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,151 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,179 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,177 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,175 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,177 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,199 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,201 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,076–8,217 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 23:028,201+2
13 Sept 2026, 07:398,199+22
9 Sept 2026, 16:388,177+2
4 Sept 2026, 07:388,175-2
31 Aug 2026, 18:378,177-2
29 Aug 2026, 04:538,179+28
26 Aug 2026, 10:018,151+20
23 Aug 2026, 20:388,131-6
19 Aug 2026, 23:068,137+3
16 Aug 2026, 16:078,134-6
12 Aug 2026, 20:038,140+48
10 Aug 2026, 02:258,092-9
6 Aug 2026, 16:458,101-1
6 Aug 2026, 09:178,102first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.5%
avg views ÷ 8,201 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,090
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held28 (23 June 202628 August 2026)
Views total16,720
Reactions total197
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

986 reactions across 28 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🐳39540.1%
👍34835.3%
🥴15015.2%
😱606.09%
🤔333.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 986 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
578
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 28 we hold a reading for · 39%
Most on one post
506
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @insuline_eth. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,270 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

gm! В арбитраже есть мелкая, но постоянная боль: половина площадок живёт на USDC, половина на USDT. Polymarket и Hyperliquid работают на USDC, а на CEX приходится свапать обратно в USDT. Каждый заход туда-сюда это своп, и на этих свопах я стабильно оставляю деньги. Раз я за спред плачу, значит кто-то его собирает, и я полез в лидерборд Aqua смотреть, чего с фармом ликвы на стейблах там. Первым делом наткнулся на поз

👍6🐳3😱1

27 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC≈1,870 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

На 3 года опередил Polymarket 🐳 https://x.com/devjoshstevens/status/2092971169255215334?s=46

🐳8

27 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC≈1,770 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

GM! Кажется, FriendTech хотят возродить Бтв, их лого сильно напоминает мне другую компанию (ответ в комментариях) https://x.com/TheBlockCo/status/2092892217194979620?s=20

🐳1

26 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC≈3,410 views57 reactionsread 28 August 2026

GM! ВкусВилл выкатил MCP-сервер: https://mcp.vkusvill.ru/mcp Я тут главный амбассадор заказа еды через агентов (https://t.me/insuline_eth/828), и до сих пор агенту оставалось только ходить по сайту через браузер, как человеку. Теперь можно нормально: подключаешь эндпоинт, и он ищет товары с составом и КБЖУ, смотрит скидки, аналоги и собирает корзину. Не до конца, оформить заказ он всё равно не даст, но на выходе гот

🐳35👍21🥴1

25 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC≈1,980 views30 reactionsread 28 August 2026

По дороге изучения перпдексов я понял, что игнорирую один свой инструмент: у меня есть аудитория. Поэтому новый перп, который стал мелькать у меня на глазах в твиттере, я решил отработать немного по другому. Написал им напрямую: я трейдер лудоман, тестирую всё, до чего дотягиваюсь, давайте я буду вашим публичным тестером. Ответили амбассадоркой: рефка, инвайты в закрытую альфу, прямой контакт с командой. Так что да,

🥴11👍9🐳5😱5

24 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC≈1,990 views53 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

GM! Ну что, International закончился. Обычно делиться хочется только тем, что взлетело. В прошлом посте про доту я написал «увидимся в ордербуках Prediction Markets», а увидеться не вышло: арбитраж киберспорта оказался сильно менее эффективным, чем я рассчитывал, и я его закрыл. План был простой. Стек под ЧМ был готов и обкатан, переключаю его на доту, добавляю predict.fun и повторяю на TI. Но на киберспорте так н

👍40🐳10🤔3

23 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC≈2,220 views24 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Если команда духов выигрывает – вечером еду на студию записывать новый трек 🙂

👍14🥴6🐳2😱2

21 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC≈2,600 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍13🥴6🤔1

21 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC≈2,660 views30 reactions10 Starsread 28 August 2026

GM! Борис Черный, создатель Claude Code, недавно на интервью сказал: удаляйте все скиллы, удаляйте системные промпты и смотрите на результат. Мы сделали так с Claude Code и не пожалели. И я его понимаю, потому что с харнессом часто происходит какая-то жесть. Модель не меняется, а обновление Claude Code начинает вести себя по-другому: что-то подкрутили внутренним патчем в харнесе, и твои скиллы, написанные под прошл

👍18🐳12

13 Aug 2026, 01:48 UTC≈3,930 views28 reactions506 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

GM! Двенадцать лет смотрел на вкладку Fantasy перед каждым чемпионатом мира по доте и ни разу не понимал, что там вообще надо делать. Я играл в доту с 2013 года. За спиной точно более 10к часов. И пускай сейчас я играю сильно реже, но за просценой слежу постоянно: перестановки в командах, результаты мейджоров, а просмотр TI пропустил от силы пару раз. И каждый год перед ним висит это фэнтези. Прогнозировать, копать

🐳24👍3😱1

10 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈4,040 views58 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

К примеру, для live сканера делать REST поллинг с 5-секундным интервалом вместо WS 😀

🐳29🥴18👍8🤔2😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @insuline_eth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Golden Borodutch
@golden_borodutch · 65,630
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“dev.insuline.eth” (@insuline_eth), 8,201 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/insuline_eth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.