Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for fhkdjhkdfj

Channel

fhkdjhkdfj

@sdgsdfhdfdfh

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,201subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001584675261
TypeChannel
Username@sdgsdfhdfdfh
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sdgsdfhdfdfh

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,2019,2399,2206 August 2026 — 9,232 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,232 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,235 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,239 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,237 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,227 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,222 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,239 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,221 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,228 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,215 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,201 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,195–9,245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 07:019,201-14
11 Sept 2026, 09:029,215-13
6 Sept 2026, 07:579,228+7
1 Sept 2026, 14:499,221-18
29 Aug 2026, 07:449,239+17
26 Aug 2026, 02:119,222-5
22 Aug 2026, 19:189,227-10
19 Aug 2026, 04:339,237-2
16 Aug 2026, 15:039,239+4
9 Aug 2026, 23:339,235+3
6 Aug 2026, 21:019,232no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:189,232first reading

Engagement

100 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.5%
avg views ÷ 9,201 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,250
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
25
of 100 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held100 (27 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total56,360
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 15s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC≈1,640 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

держите вам темку чел недельку назад сделал сайт, в котором ничего кроме рекламы нет)))) суть - есть топ, и ты можешь выкупить место и отрекламить свой проект челы за неделю сделали на этом 200,000$+ https://x.com/jonathan_wilke/status/2090184058810544467

28 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 29 August 2026

вот вам чтиво на выходные, оно про джастина сана, думаю все знают его (фаундер трона), не удивляйтесь, что оно на китайском https://x.com/justinsuntron/status/2092932777612390850 просто доверьтесь и прочитайте, или хотя бы тлдр спросите у клодика, будете удивлены

28 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC≈2,040 viewsread 29 August 2026

щас в чате одном пишут, что массово сдрейнили с криптобанков типа tria, avici и тд, чекните мб вас тоже задело но это надо быть мегамозгом хранить бабки в криптобанке

28 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC≈1,920 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

я вообще не понимаю, зачем мне говорить доход рандомному типу? вот скажите хоть одну причину

28 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC≈2,030 viewsread 29 August 2026

буквально я https://x.com/Govindtwtt/status/2093255950304182482

27 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC≈2,190 viewsread 29 August 2026

Есть какие-нибудь крипто проекты, где отели/полеты дешевле чем в обычных агрегаторах? В прошлом году юзал solayer travel, отель вышел процентов на 10-15% дешевле чем на букинге, но щас он лежит чет Мб есть что нибудь такое еще. Можете сразу с рефкой кидать

27 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC≈2,230 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

всегда найдётся такой хуесос я не понимаю, что у человека в голове вообще происходит

27 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC≈2,200 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

щас в основу дропнул постик, а телега мне сказала - братан, ща через 3 минуты дропнем, мы видосик оптизируем, впервые вижу такое

27 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈2,390 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

листаю твиттер мой любимый и вижу, что мачи биг бразер (крупный китайский кит) заявил о планах на CTO friend tech, и тут мои олдскулы активно зашевелились... я вообще не любитель лудки, но этот проект в свое время сделал невероятно много шума и это ахуенно ложится на нынешнюю мету с мемами и социал фи штуками (типо фомо) ну либо чел просто сумки набирал и решил разгрузиться, но там копейки вышли, на него точно не

26 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC≈2,310 viewsread 29 August 2026

как вы обходите ограничения моделей, если он начинает выебываться?

Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @sdgsdfhdfdfh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Aug 2026, 21:20 UTCAnonymous Poll883 voters

Кто активно вайбкодит ну хотя бы 3 месяца, вы хоть что-то с этого заработали?

  1. Да, был еще до этого заработок, с вайбкодом улучшил его и стал зарабатывать больше11%
  2. Да, создал/нашел новую темку с помощью вайбкода и с ней заработал17%
  3. Нет, был до этого заработок, пытался улучшить вайбкодом, не получилось13%
  4. Нет, создал/нашел новую темку с помощью вайбкода и с ней не заработал17%
  5. Посмотреть результаты (я не вайбкожу вообще ничего)48%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

29 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTCAnonymous Poll1,430 voters approx.

С чего у вас сейчас идет основной заработок

  1. С крипты (дегенка, арбитраж, фарминги, дефай)13%
  2. Около крипты (рефки, продукты, проекты)4%
  3. Фриланс, услуги, работа на себя9%
  4. Обычная работа с перспективой (айтишка, просто работа на дядю)26%
  5. Обычная работа на фарм бабла без особой перспективы (курьер, склады тд)11%
  6. Свои проекты вне крипты (каналы, аи б2б саасы :))6%
  7. Пассив в веб2 (недвига, облигации и тд)2%
  8. Нет заработка вообще30%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

криптапиражок
@cryppi · 30,536
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
moni talks [крипта]
@moni_talks · 24,884
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026
Steamify - Фарми скины CS2
@steamify · 40,731
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
ꜱᴇɪɴᴀʀᴜᴋɪʀᴏ
@seinarukiro · 85,023
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 September 2026
sad cat
@sadcatgamble · 28,032
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 September 2026
FACK BLOCK RESEARCH
@fackblock · 24,911
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
Lazy Crypto
@lazycryp · 29,063
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
Славик инвестор | TwitterScore.io
@slavik_investor · 24,783
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
ProMint
@ProMintChannel · 25,194
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
SWIPER
@swiper_money · 28,436
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
CRYPTON | Крипта, ИИ, Финансы
@crypton_off · 60,363
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto mnst [Youtube]
@mnstmoney · 25,431
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 September 2026
CryptoEarn Important
@CryptoEarnImp · 28,227
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“fhkdjhkdfj” (@sdgsdfhdfdfh), 9,201 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sdgsdfhdfdfh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.