Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for fhkdjhkdfj

Channel

fhkdjhkdfj

@sdgsdfhdfdfh

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,402subscribers

+170 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001584675261
TypeChannel
Username@sdgsdfhdfdfh
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sdgsdfhdfdfh

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,2019,4029,301.56 August 2026 — 9,232 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,232 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,235 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,239 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,237 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,227 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,222 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,239 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,221 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,228 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,215 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,201 subscribers25 September 2026 — 9,240 subscribers4 October 2026 — 9,239 subscribers10 October 2026 — 9,245 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,247 subscribers17 October 2026 — 9,238 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,236 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,237 subscribers25 October 2026 — 9,241 subscribers28 October 2026 — 9,240 subscribers31 October 2026 — 9,253 subscribers3 November 2026 — 9,395 subscribers6 November 2026 — 9,402 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 92 days, net +170. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,171–9,432 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 13:189,402+7
3 Nov 2026, 22:419,395+142
31 Oct 2026, 18:219,253+13
28 Oct 2026, 20:569,240-1
25 Oct 2026, 23:469,241+4
23 Oct 2026, 09:079,237+1
20 Oct 2026, 01:359,236-2
17 Oct 2026, 04:579,238-9
14 Oct 2026, 05:379,247+2
10 Oct 2026, 15:579,245+6
4 Oct 2026, 19:549,239-1
25 Sept 2026, 10:399,240+39
15 Sept 2026, 07:019,201-14
11 Sept 2026, 09:029,215-13
6 Sept 2026, 07:579,228+7
1 Sept 2026, 14:499,221-18
29 Aug 2026, 07:449,239+17
26 Aug 2026, 02:119,222-5
22 Aug 2026, 19:189,227-10
19 Aug 2026, 04:339,237first reading

Engagement

135 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.7%
avg views ÷ 9,402 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,890
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
35
of 135 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held135 (27 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total101,010
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 09:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 15s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (17.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 17:47 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 6 November 2026

пожалуй единственное и лучшее что вы можете прочитать если хотите развивать свой твиттер https://x.com/Cbb0fe/status/2118312459425419631

5 Nov 2026, 11:22 UTC≈1,920 viewsread 6 November 2026

спасибо за ваши ответы, ничего против не имею, но выскажу своё мнение я привык, что ноут для меня = работа а телефон это больше чилл, видосики, связь, у меня тут нет ничего рабочего я просто боюсь, что не буду вообще отдыхать, особенно ментально, если накачу агентскую разработку еще и на телефон да это круто классно технологично, но...

5 Nov 2026, 08:47 UTC≈2,220 viewsread 6 November 2026

вайбкодить с телефона норм или кринж? почему?

4 Nov 2026, 20:21 UTC≈2,460 viewsread 6 November 2026

просто задумайтесь я в вашей жизни каждый день

4 Nov 2026, 18:37 UTC≈2,560 viewsread 6 November 2026

http://x.com/Gingfacekillah/status/1619757576924823556 читаем и вдохновляемся

4 Nov 2026, 16:41 UTC≈2,680 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

китайцы как всегда типочек купил айфон дуо чисто чтобы можно было удобно арбитражить https://x.com/Ron521520/status/2117973891435893182

4 Nov 2026, 15:47 UTC≈2,610 viewsread 6 November 2026

бинанс выводит щас? или все еще в говне?

4 Nov 2026, 14:22 UTC≈2,720 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

ладно, 45 параллельных агентов было слишком

4 Nov 2026, 10:21 UTC≈2,760 viewsread 6 November 2026

чуваки не пишите мне плз в лс как проходить кус клода, вас прям оч много Я НЕ ЗНАЮ!!! я просто создал новый акк, и мне пока что вериф не кинули и может вообще не кинут, так как я успешно обошел их антифрод

4 Nov 2026, 09:28 UTC≈2,720 viewsread 6 November 2026

кстати, мекс прошелся без проблем а вот битгет реджектнули по причине того, что уже регнут другой акк

Showing the 12 most recent of 135 posts we hold for @sdgsdfhdfdfh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Aug 2026, 21:20 UTCAnonymous Poll883 voters

Кто активно вайбкодит ну хотя бы 3 месяца, вы хоть что-то с этого заработали?

  1. Да, был еще до этого заработок, с вайбкодом улучшил его и стал зарабатывать больше11%
  2. Да, создал/нашел новую темку с помощью вайбкода и с ней заработал17%
  3. Нет, был до этого заработок, пытался улучшить вайбкодом, не получилось13%
  4. Нет, создал/нашел новую темку с помощью вайбкода и с ней не заработал17%
  5. Посмотреть результаты (я не вайбкожу вообще ничего)48%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

29 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTCAnonymous Poll1,430 voters approx.

С чего у вас сейчас идет основной заработок

  1. С крипты (дегенка, арбитраж, фарминги, дефай)13%
  2. Около крипты (рефки, продукты, проекты)4%
  3. Фриланс, услуги, работа на себя9%
  4. Обычная работа с перспективой (айтишка, просто работа на дядю)26%
  5. Обычная работа на фарм бабла без особой перспективы (курьер, склады тд)11%
  6. Свои проекты вне крипты (каналы, аи б2б саасы :))6%
  7. Пассив в веб2 (недвига, облигации и тд)2%
  8. Нет заработка вообще30%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 135 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

криптапиражок
@cryppi · 30,086
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
moni talks [крипта]
@moni_talks · 24,517
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026
Steamify - Фарми скины CS2
@steamify · 38,226
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
ꜱᴇɪɴᴀʀᴜᴋɪʀᴏ
@seinarukiro · 78,795
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 September 2026
sad cat
@sadcatgamble · 27,587
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 September 2026
FACK BLOCK RESEARCH
@fackblock · 25,080
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
Lazy Crypto
@lazycryp · 28,362
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
Славик инвестор | TwitterScore.io
@slavik_investor · 24,366
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
ProMint
@ProMintChannel · 24,870
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
SWIPER
@swiper_money · 27,626
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
CRYPTON | Крипта, ИИ, Финансы
@crypton_off · 57,929
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto mnst [Youtube]
@mnstmoney · 18,712
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 September 2026
CryptoEarn Important
@CryptoEarnImp · 27,410
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“fhkdjhkdfj” (@sdgsdfhdfdfh), 9,402 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sdgsdfhdfdfh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.