😊 Alibaba raised $10.2 billion in Hong Kong's largest ever secondary offering - 100% going to AI infrastructure Net profit fell 75% year-on-year due to capital spending, stock dropped 12% after hours despite the raise being oversubscribed Raised $10B for AI, profit down 75%, stock dropped - investors not impressed by the math 😞

Channel
intelplex ( NEWS )
@intelplex
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
7,378subscribers
+3,584 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002977980246 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @intelplex |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/intelplex |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 7,378 | +476 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 6,902 | -744 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 7,646 | +1,379 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 6,267 | -999 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 7,266 | +3,757 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:09 | 3,509 | -160 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 3,669 | -180 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 3,849 | +55 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 3,794 | first reading |
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.9%
- avg views ÷ 7,378 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,910
- 30 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 30
- of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 42 (24 July 2026 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 57,270 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
🐸 BitMart reversed its closure decision and is now considering restructuring instead Hired White & Case law firm to develop a plan - next update by September 9, final decision depends on legal and financial review Announced closing, users couldn't withdraw, now reconsidering - classic FTX trajectory but slower 😐
😃 Eric Trump denied rumors of a new Trump memecoin - "absolutely not true" Meanwhile the TRUMP team quietly moved 2.62 million TRUMP tokens worth $6.21M to OKX Denied the new coin while selling the old one 😂
😮 Canadian Prime Minister declares Canada is in a trade "war" with the United States Friendly neighbors having a very unfriendly year 🔫
Want To Gamble With No KYC Or ID? We Offer Tons Of Games Such As BlackJack, Mines And Dice. Join @Dices and enter the weekly giveaways!
👏 Standard Chartered predicts Bitcoin hits $100,000 by end of year Same bank that compared Ethereum to Amazon after the dot-com crash - they're on a prediction streak 🍑
☠️ Crypto Ponzi organizer Edward Zimbardi deported from Fiji after hiding for over a year - raised $165M promising 25% monthly returns Thousands of investors fell for guaranteed 25% per month - that's 300% annually 25% guaranteed monthly returns and people still invested - greed is a powerful drug 😐
😊 CZ says if you want to thank yourself in 2 years, stop trying to time the market and start thinking at least a year ahead Advice from the guy whose net worth fluctuates by $10B per week 📝
🎧 Elon Musk is planning stablecoin payments for content creators on X X wants to be your social network, bank and now your payroll system 😂
🤖 Elon Musk says Tesla's Optimus robot and Grok will provide "incredible medical care to all people on Earth" Man with a rocket company, an AI company, a car company and a social network is now solving healthcare 😂
😊 Telegram applied to ICANN for its own .gram top-level domain - usernames become websites @durov becomes durov.gram, sites hosted directly inside Telegram with a single text prompt Telegram wants to be your browser, bank and domain registrar 😂
🏴☠️ Pirated copies of Odyssey are hiding Lumma Stealer malware that grabs crypto wallet data, passwords and auth cookies - bypassing 2FA Downloaded a free movie, gave hackers your crypto 👺
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @intelplex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,602,165 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@intelplex named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 22 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“intelplex ( NEWS )” (@intelplex), 7,378 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/intelplex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.