3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26–27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 23:58
26
-1
11 Aug 2026, 07:02
27
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:27
27
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 17 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
72 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
29
40.3%
🔥
21
29.2%
❤
14
19.4%
👍
6
8.33%
🙏
1
1.39%
🤩
1
1.39%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2023 to 4 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎙️Тайм-менеджмент — фигня
Почему часто список дел не помогает, а только угнетает? Что мы упускаем при планировнии? Как выполнять все поставленные задачи?
📌О спикере:
«Меня зовут Даша - коуч, тренер нейроинтеграции и agile-планирования
За месяц я помогаю своим клиентам сделать их жизнь счастливее, проще, понятнее: начать действовать, выйти из гонки и наслаждаясь моментом, достичь целей в кайф»
tg-канал: https://t…
Достигать желаемого результата так сложно интересно
Но иногда случается какой-то затык, и непонятно, почему ничего не происходит
Основательница Инверсии, написала статью, которая поможет тебе с этим!
🔘 Точно ли ты знаешь, что такое результат?
🔘 С чего он начинается?
🔘 Как на него влиять?
🔘 Что делать, если жизнь будто встала на паузу, не получается действовать?
ссылка на статью - https://teletype.in/@medvydewa/re…
Подборка на выходные
Какие бы не были планы, выдели немного времени на свое развитие! А мы постарались собрать только интересный контент, который смотрели с удовольствием сами:)
🍿Фильмы
«Ламборгини: Человек легенда»
«100 вещей и ничего лишнего»
📹 Ютуб
«10 правил успешного человека | Петр Осипов»
«Формула уникальности, девелопмент, создание Москва Сити и много инсайтов | Сергей Полонский»
🎙 Подкасты
«Как понять, ч…
5 вопрос
– Я хочу больше зарабатывать, с чего мне начать?
Нужно начинать с мышления и проработки установок. От того, как ты мыслишь, зависит твоя стратегия. А вот страхи — это та штука, которая убьет нахер всю стратегию
Я приготовила статью, там как раз, и про мышление, и про страхи. Эта статья — идеальный первый шаг к высокому заработку ❤️
Статья: https://www.notion.so/2fbffdb20f6e4e9483704ae77b4b2863
🎤Интервью с экспертом
1 вопрос
– Расскажи о себе? Чем занимаешься?
Привет! Я Рита, помогаю выйти в состояние легкости и раскрыть мышление. И на этом состоянии мои ученицы делают х5 в доходе 😜
В общих словах, я денежный коуч, но у меня особые инструменты, которые за гранью привычного «коучинга»
tg: https://t.me/mrgriiita_money
🙂😀😘😗🥹🥰 🙂😀☺️🙃😆
Как реализовать свой потенциал, создать и сделать узнаваемым продукт, перестать откладывать и усложнять?
Ответ на эти и другие вопросы ты сможешь услышать на мастермайнде от проекта u’llbe!
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
мастермайнд by u'llbe - это групповой созвон единомышленников направленный на решение запросов в рамках выбранной темы
Приглашённые спикеры поделятся экспертной информацией и помогут найти отве…
Включай и записывай!
🎙Подкаст на тему «Пошаговый план заработка эксперта в Телеграм канале»
🟡Из чего состоит продающий фундамент канала
🟡Лучшие способы продвижения канала
🟡Топ 3 воронки продаж для Телеграм канала
📎О спикере:
«Меня зовут Маргарита - я наставник в Телеграм для экспертов и их ассистентов. Помогаю зарабатывать с помощью рабочих инструментов ведения и продвижения Телеграм канала.
Моя цель:
Показать, ч…
Почему именно твой путь уникален?
Притча о букете цветов🌷
📎Об эксперте:
«Меня зовут Варя, и я проводник в мир принятия себя и своих эмоций. Работаю в сфере психологии с уклоном на любовь к себе и к миру. Веду блог и обволакиваю своим подходом»
tg: https://t.me/varvara_hlo
inst: https://instagram.com/varvara_hlopunova?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
@varvara_hlopunova
В картинках к этому посту ты можешь прочитать небольшую прит…
Доброе утро!☀️
Пока мы готовим для тебя новый контент, ответь, пожалуйста, на один вопрос - какой формат тебе ближе, интереснее?
Можно выбрать несколько вариантов
Подкаст87%
Эфир33%
Статья20%
Интервью47%
Пост40%
Подборка60%
Другое (напишу в комментариях)0%
The shares total 287%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @inversiaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Доброе утро!☀️
Пока мы готовим для тебя новый контент, ответь, пожалуйста, на один вопрос - какой формат тебе ближе, интереснее?
Можно выбрать несколько вариантов
Подкаст87%
Эфир33%
Статья20%
Интервью47%
Пост40%
Подборка60%
Другое (напишу в комментариях)0%
The shares total 287%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Делаем подборки интересного и полезного контента постоянной рубрикой?
Для меня не актуально0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2023 to 4 May 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@inversiaaa named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@varvara_hlo named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026 · confirmed gone 16 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@mrgriiita_money named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@varvara_hlopunova named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИНВЕРСИЯ” (@inversiaaa), 26 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inversiaaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.