Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IRCTC

Channel

IRCTC

@irctc

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,596subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001084060686
TypeChannel
Username@irctc
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/irctc

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5951,6131,6048 August 2026 — 1,613 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,613 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,610 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,609 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,608 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,604 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,606 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,603 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,600 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,595 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,596 subscribers1,5968 August 202613 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 35 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,592–1,616 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 02:371,596+1
8 Sept 2026, 22:001,595-5
3 Sept 2026, 09:491,600-3
30 Aug 2026, 17:341,603-3
25 Aug 2026, 08:021,606+2
22 Aug 2026, 06:571,604-4
18 Aug 2026, 21:151,608-1
16 Aug 2026, 03:331,609-1
12 Aug 2026, 05:541,610-3
9 Aug 2026, 05:011,613no change
8 Aug 2026, 18:311,613first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @irctc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UP Police
@uppolice · 48,583
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 25 August 2026
ResultBharat.com
@officialresultbharat · 39,843
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 30 August 2026
UP STATIC POLICE CONSTABLE SSC GD GK SI
@up_police_constable_SSC_GD_GK_SI · 204,300
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IRCTC” (@irctc), 1,596 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irctc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.