Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for UP Police

Channel

UP Police

@uppolice

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

47,506subscribers

-2,638 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001563680885
TypeChannel
Username@uppolice
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/uppolice

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

47,50650,14448,8257 August 20266 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 91 days, net -2,638. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,110–50,540 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 07:2747,506-18
5 Nov 2026, 09:2147,524-20
4 Nov 2026, 11:0947,544-16
3 Nov 2026, 14:2747,560-15
2 Nov 2026, 16:5547,575-22
1 Nov 2026, 17:4747,597-15
31 Oct 2026, 17:1147,612-36
30 Oct 2026, 18:1147,648-20
29 Oct 2026, 15:5947,668-24
28 Oct 2026, 16:5047,692-17
27 Oct 2026, 18:1547,709-20
26 Oct 2026, 18:0147,729-16
25 Oct 2026, 16:1047,745-10
24 Oct 2026, 12:4047,755-22
23 Oct 2026, 12:5947,777-12
22 Oct 2026, 09:4047,789-35
21 Oct 2026, 02:4047,824-5
20 Oct 2026, 04:0147,829-52
19 Oct 2026, 02:5747,881-25
18 Oct 2026, 06:1847,906first reading

Engagement

252 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.73%
avg views ÷ 47,506 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,300
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
38
of 252 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026
Posts held252 (2 August 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Views total49,236
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 01:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

1 Nov 2026, 17:50 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 6 November 2026

https://x.com/Uppolice/status/2116945010407125289?a=klxD12lwWcy-mHSJ2Kk&s=20

1 Nov 2026, 17:50 UTC≈1,710 viewsread 6 November 2026

https://x.com/Uppolice/status/2116944281986617422?a=fTuyqSLe0i6MlTdKr4w&s=20

1 Nov 2026, 17:50 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 6 November 2026

https://x.com/Uppolice/status/2116937624455880961?a=cevnigqiYx3Hs5Pkbzk&s=20

1 Nov 2026, 17:49 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 6 November 2026

https://x.com/Uppolice/status/2116915596126552450?a=1PLdLpE92am58zrThPY&s=20

1 Nov 2026, 17:49 UTC883 viewsread 6 November 2026

https://x.com/Uppolice/status/2116914013854638100?a=8F4c_H-LT1kxq_HYjuc&s=20

1 Nov 2026, 17:49 UTC870 viewsread 6 November 2026

https://x.com/Uppolice/status/2116912343183683870?a=kTBk_aqa5PMFJdCliFg&s=20

1 Nov 2026, 17:49 UTC780 viewsread 6 November 2026

https://x.com/Uppolice/status/2116912008054612411?a=Gl-buRQJ-h5PoFHFqYk&s=20

1 Nov 2026, 17:48 UTC928 viewsread 6 November 2026

https://x.com/Uppolice/status/2116910757015441513?a=RSzC_oeK9ev7ezQKTsk&s=20

1 Nov 2026, 17:47 UTC919 viewsread 6 November 2026

https://x.com/Uppolice/status/2116845096528449903?a=I8aIo5ADNBCokC9YC2E&s=20

28 Oct 2026, 17:57 UTC≈2,540 viewsread 6 November 2026

https://x.com/Uppolice/status/2115352907818418424?a=_WTXg3_5YoCyc-I-CWA&s=20

28 Oct 2026, 17:55 UTC≈2,120 viewsread 6 November 2026

https://x.com/Uppolice/status/2115352642612613458?a=xtieEZP8GnTGfMTM314&s=20

26 Oct 2026, 17:24 UTC≈2,480 viewsread 6 November 2026

https://x.com/Uppolice/status/2114716249280418162?s=20

Showing the 12 most recent of 252 posts we hold for @uppolice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @uppolice as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
23 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
23 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
32 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Delhi Police
@DelhiPoliceOfficial · 25,965
#1
Teaching by Rojgar With Ankit™🎖️
@teachingbyrojgaarwithankit · 171,104
#2
UP Police Constable UPSI Exams Quiz ™
@UP_Police_Constable_SI_Exams_Gk · 85,629
#3
ISEA Cyber Security Awareness
@ssoindia · 1,205
#4
Piyush Pastor
@MrRealPiyushPastor · 521 (as read 25 August 2026)
#5
SK TECHNOVATION
@sk_technovation · 3,518
#6
𝗨𝗣𝗦𝗖 Motivation 𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗢🥇
@UPSC_MOTIVATION_VIDEOSS · 537
#7
UPSC All India Radio Summary
@Ias_Academy · 1,074
#8
𝙇𝙖𝙛𝙙𝙖𝙯𝙤𝙣𝙚
@lafdazone · 1,309
#9
VIVEK SIR NOTES(Examपुर)
@VivekSirNotes · 135,067
#10
Preeti Mam Exampur Notes
@preetimamexampurnotes · 85,027
#11
Up Police SI 4543™ 🇮🇳
@UP_SI_4543 · 3,440
#12
HINDI BY ARUN SIR
@HINDIBYARUNKMAR · 127,283
#13
Vipul Sir Exampur Maths 😍
@vipulsirexampurmaths · 30,133
#14
Harendra Sir Gk Gs Exampur
@Harendrasirexampur · 25,860
#15
UP Police Constable UPSSSC PET Quiz ™
@UP_Police_Constable_UPSSSC_PET_K · 142,702
#16
Sarkari Result ® SarkariResult.Com Official
@SarkariResult2012 · 1,515,503
#17
UP Police JOBS 🇮🇳
@uppolice_m · 14,212
#18
UPSC EPFO APFC Current Affairs
@UPSC_EPFO_APFC_Current_Affairs · 245,483
#19
𝗖𝗖𝗦𝗨 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀 & 𝗨𝗽𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 (चौ. चरण सिंह विश्वविद्यालय, मेरठ)
@myccsu · 12,965
#20
Jaun Elia Shayari
@jaun_elia_shayari · 7,039
#21
Study For Dreams
@studyfordreams · 191,955
#22
дарина и ЭТО БЫЛО В ВО
@dittspukanal · 223
#23
Поліція Львівської області
@lviv_region_poluce · 1,597
#24
Careerwill App
@CareerwillApp · 948,307
#25
RD CAMPUS AGRA
@RG8900 · 1,575
#26
Kannada Books
@Kannadabookcollection · 2,988
#27
Examnotesfind IAS, SSC, Bank, Railway All One Day Exams Notes 🇮🇳
@examnotesfind · 3,069
#28
OTZVIP
@otzvip · 317
#29
Meme society
@imharamii · 337
#30
Panchjanya
@epanchjanya · 5,767
#31
UPSC IAS SSC Static GK GS Quiz GD हिंदी
@UPSC_Static_GK_GS_Quiz_SSC_GD · 154,303
#32
Brahmanical Patriarchy
@brahmanicalpatriarchy · 660
#33
Crpf Constable Tradesman Technical
@CRPF_CONSTABLE_Tradesman_Tech · 13,367
#34
उत्तर प्रदेश भर्ती परीक्षा
@uttarpradeshSarkarijob · 48,076
#35
🚨🚔"KHAKI" 🚨🚔 Ganesh shinde sir
@ganeshshindeunacademy · 2,415
#36
📓 अच्छी और प्रेरक बातें ™
@Achi_Bate_Suvichar_Sandesh · 4,428
#37
Vipul sir Exampur Notes
@vipulsirexampur · 122,399
#38
Anil Study Point Pdf Hub
@Anil_Study_Point · 37,106
#39
IRCTC Official
@IRCTC_Official · 11,690
#40
Up Police SI 2026
@Up_Police_SI_Daroga_GK_Quiz_2026 · 138,988
#41
UPSSSC,PET,UP POLICE,लेखपाल,VDO, जूनियर असिस्टेंट
@UPSSSC_PET_VDO_UPP_UPPRB · 34,911
#42
Exᴀᴍᴢʏ (Sᴛᴜᴅʏ Gʀᴏᴜᴘ)
@Examzy · 32,810
#43
👮‍♂FKT VARDI वर्दी 🚔®
@fktvardi · 130,784
#44
IRCTC
@irctc · 1,594
#45
CyberDost
@cyberdosti4c · 21,689
#46
𝐌𝐈𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐏𝐂𝐒 / मिशन PCS
@Mission_PCS · 16,857
#47

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Delhi Police
@DelhiPoliceOfficial · 25,965
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 12 September 2026
Anil Study Point Pdf Hub
@Anil_Study_Point · 37,106
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 31 August 2026
Vipul Sir Exampur Maths 😍
@vipulsirexampurmaths · 30,133
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 6 September 2026
UPSI UP Police UPSSSC UPTET Exam GK
@UPSI_UP_Police_UPSSSC_UPTET_Exam · 94,152
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UP Police” (@uppolice), 47,506 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uppolice.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.