Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кризис драмы

Channel

Кризис драмы

@irenedrama

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,250subscribers

+69 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002117060850
TypeChannel
Username@irenedrama
DescriptionМое субъективное о книжном и не только Реклама - https://inlnk.ru/G68LXK Связь - @irenabooks МАХ - https://max.ru/irenedrama РКН - https://clck.ru/3Fsiuy
Created11 November 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/irenedrama

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,10311,27311,1886 August 2026 — 11,181 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,181 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,189 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,180 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,177 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,174 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,167 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,166 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,157 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,156 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,150 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,133 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,130 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,124 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,123 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,120 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,116 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,112 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,110 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,105 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,103 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,157 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,174 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,179 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,184 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,188 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,184 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,181 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,173 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,154 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,145 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,136 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,129 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,140 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,165 subscribers1 October 2026 — 11,205 subscribers6 October 2026 — 11,203 subscribers10 October 2026 — 11,273 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,260 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,251 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,250 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,249 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,245 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,228 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,232 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,228 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,222 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,219 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,217 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,250 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,264 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,270 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,269 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,268 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,263 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,255 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,257 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,252 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,249 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,250 subscribers11,2506 August 20267 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 94 days, net +69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,078–11,299 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 14:5111,250+1
6 Nov 2026, 11:1711,249-3
5 Nov 2026, 12:1811,252-5
4 Nov 2026, 10:1911,257+2
3 Nov 2026, 10:4011,255-8
2 Nov 2026, 09:5511,263-5
1 Nov 2026, 09:5811,268-1
31 Oct 2026, 07:4811,269-1
30 Oct 2026, 10:2011,270+6
29 Oct 2026, 10:5511,264+14
28 Oct 2026, 08:3911,250+33
27 Oct 2026, 10:4911,217-2
25 Oct 2026, 05:3511,219-3
24 Oct 2026, 07:2511,222-6
23 Oct 2026, 08:1911,228-4
21 Oct 2026, 01:2711,232+4
19 Oct 2026, 21:2811,228-17
19 Oct 2026, 01:0011,245-4
17 Oct 2026, 03:4111,249-1
16 Oct 2026, 01:0711,250first reading

Engagement

156 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.0%
avg views ÷ 11,250 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,130
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 156 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held156 (4 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total33,836
Reactions total1,321
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 08:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,910
Videos
≈151
Links
≈1,120

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
11m 00s
Average length
1m 23s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,557 reactions across 147 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,25834.4%
❤1,27519.4%
🔥86813.2%
😁5868.94%
💯3605.49%
👎1742.65%
👏1532.33%
🤔1342.04%
❤‍🔥1071.63%
😢851.30%
🤯701.07%
🤩681.04%
😡590.9%
🙏580.885%
🗿570.869%
😱410.625%
🎉310.473%
🫡270.412%
🤝260.397%
🤷‍♂220.336%
13 further kinds981.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 154 of the 156 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,796 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 156 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 156 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @irenedrama. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 156 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (6.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 17:07 UTC603 views18 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Так получилось, что обсуждения книг в рамках Совместных чтений сейчас проходят в Максе. И отзывы пишут, и книги читают, и бурно обсуждают прочитанное люди без доступа к Телеграмму. Невольно уверуешь в теорию, что думскроллинг "убивает" чтение. С другой стороны, если взять моих подписчиков, то остались тут и катерически против Макса те, кто и до Макса не писал отзывы и не особо участвовал в СЧ. Даже не знаю, стоит ли…

❤17🗿1

7 Nov 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,230 views19 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Стали известны финалисты II Международной литературной премии "История будущего" Среди финалистов номинации "Лучший рассказ" — Юлия Иовлева ("Обратный билет", Тула), Алексей Кондратенко ("Реставратор памяти", Люберцы), Олег Никифоров ("Мост через ничего", Москва) и Дарина Стрельченко ("Бумага", Глазов). В номинации для детей и подростков отмечены Анна Бастрыкина ("Как Лида вернула ветер", Санкт-Петербург), Николай …

❤13👍6

7 Nov 2026, 13:11 UTC772 views37 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Сбер включил сервис Литрес в подписку СберПрайм Сбер объявил о сотрудничестве с сервисом книг Литрес и в рамках базовой подписки СберПрайм предоставил пользователям доступ к Литрес Подписке. Литрес Подписка дает возможность читать и слушать книги из каталога сервиса без ограничений по количеству произведений, а также скидку до 30% на книги из Литрес и кэшбэк 20% за покупки в сети "Читай-город".

👍22❤10💔5

7 Nov 2026, 09:13 UTC782 views68 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Биография Ленина была мне, в основном, известна и до книги Логинова. Как сейчас преподносится читателю жизнь великого вождя? Вот какой вопрос заставил меня взяться за чтение этой огромной книги. Каждое моё утро в течение двух месяцев начиналось с неё. "В. И. Ленин. Полная биография", написанная Владленом Логиновым, оказалась не совсем полной, но всё же основные вехи жизни Владимира Ильича автор освещает подробно. И…

👍39❤13🔥10👎6

7 Nov 2026, 08:23 UTC761 views18 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🎉11❤3👍3😁1

5 Nov 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,010 views67 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Пицца, будь

🔥42👍9❤7🎉4👎1🗿1🤯1😁1

5 Nov 2026, 12:23 UTC≈1,020 views14 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Свежий лауреат Гонкуровской премии 2026 Филипп Женада признался в использовании ИИ в своем романе-победителе Едва получив награду, писатель рассказал, что трижды использовал искусственный интеллект при написании романа "Незнакомка с набережной Жавель", который принес ему премию Гонкур. Женада пояснил, что впервые он использовал его, вставив в текст одну фразу, написанную ChatGPT, чтобы "поиграть с читателем". Такж…

❤8😱4🔥2

5 Nov 2026, 11:16 UTC962 views59 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Некоторое время назад я обратила внимание на небольшую книгу "Старик, который читал любовные романы" Луиса Сепульведы. Автор — чилийский писатель, эколог, соратник Сальвадора Альенде. После переворота Пиночета и гибели Альенде он был арестован и несколько лет подвергался пыткам в тюрьме. Неожиданно роман стал для меня источником добрых, чистых чувств, которые вызвал главный герой романа — старик Антонио Боливар. Он…

❤38👍11🔥10

4 Nov 2026, 15:04 UTC≈1,020 views88 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Наконец-то я посмотрела сериал "Марик", и оказалось, что вся эта лента - буквально на разрыв сердца, как точно выразилась одна из героинь Елена Семеновна про главного героя, доктора Марка Андреевича Аксенова. Это не стандартная картина про СВО, не военная драма. Здесь нет боев, окопов, дронов. Действие происходит в уже российском Мариуполе. Все страшные баталии позади, город отстраивается, пытается жить мирной жизнью…

❤49🔥19👍14🙏4👎1😁1

4 Nov 2026, 09:31 UTC≈1,050 views44 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Не могу говорить про весь воюющий народ, да это и нереально - мы слишком разные, с разными задачами и разным опытом, но юмор на войне - это не только спасение, через которое идет нервная разрядка, но и то, что запомнится потом. Да, дерьмо тоже будешь помнить, тем не менее, именно вот такие приколы составляют львиную долю обсуждений и воспоминаний в блинчике. Разве что дело касается тех, кого не стало... Тогда не до …

🔥23💯8❤5👍5😁2🤩1

4 Nov 2026, 08:07 UTC995 views39 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Мои воюющие знакомые одобрили сериал. Я еще по книгам про СВО поняла, что люди на фронте не хотят читать о фронте. Им ада хватает и так вокруг. Поэтому они или совсем игнорируют искусство СВО, или предпочитают смотреть фильмы и читать книги без жести, а вот с таким юмором. Пользуясь случаем, порекомендую книжку, написанную участником СВО тоже по типу "ДМБ" - это "Фелин" Максима Балдова. Я знаю, что этот томик широко …

👍18🔥10💯8👎3

4 Nov 2026, 08:05 UTC≈1,050 views8 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @demidovoleg

По совету Ирины Пуховой начал смотреть новый сериал об СВО — «Обратная сторона медали». Я не воевал. В армии не служил. Был в воюющих городах и посёлках по разным поводам. Не более того. Что-то понимаю и чувствую, но это разительно отличается от того, что чувствует военный. Сериал, действительно, снят по типу «ДМБ». А я этот дебилизм терпеть не могу. И всё же... интересно. Это резко отличается от прежних фильмов …

🔥6👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 156 posts we hold for @irenedrama. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 8 posts on @irenedrama as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
29 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTCAnonymous Poll293 voters

Давайте опрос. Ответьте честно, нужен вам чат при канале?

  1. Нужен, там прикольный флуд25%
  2. Нужен, но только для комментирования по делу25%
  3. Я читаю посты в канале, в чат не хожу37%
  4. Мне все равно10%
  5. Свой вариант, включите чат - расскажу3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 156 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Аня читает
@book_movie_guide · 19,551
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 October 2026
Аня смотрит сериалы
@book_movie_guide_kino · 50,088
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
Историк в телефоне
@history_doronina · 48,985
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
Я сейчас читаю 📚
@yaseychaschitayu · 19,112
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 October 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кризис драмы” (@irenedrama), 11,250 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irenedrama.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.