Channel
@iseriousplay
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,412subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001001986631 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iseriousplay |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iseriousplay |
Recorded in 2019 as “iSeriousPlay بازی های جدی” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 2,412 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 2,411 | +14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 2,397 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 2,401 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 2,407 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 2,405 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 2,403 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 2,411 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 2,413 | +9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 2,404 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 18:40 | 2,404 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
31 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 54.8% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 22.6% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ایده تازه و بدردبخور بسادگی به ذهن نمیاد. اگر اینطور بود هر کسی می تونست ایده بده و از طریق اون به نون و نوایی برسه. خلق ایده تازه زحمت داره. باید وارد یک تونل وحشت شد تا بشه ایده بدردبخوری ساخت. شما می دونید چطوری میشه یک ایده خوب ساخت؟ @iseriousplay بازی جدی اسپروت
Signed Saeid Khak Rah
ایده های کلیشه ای دیگه جواب نمیده؟ از هر راهی میری به بن بست میخوری؟ وقت زیادی نمونده؟ داری خیلی چیزها رو از دست میدی؟ دنبال ایده های نو میگردی؟ از روش های پیچیده ایده سازی چیزی در نیومده؟ ایده ای می خواهی که خودت خلق کرده باشی؟ @iseriousplay بازی جدی اسپروت
Signed Saeid Khak Rah
بازی های جدی مدیریتی pinned a photo
قرار نیست همه فضاها و لحظات رو پر کنیم. گاهی اوقات فراوانی در خالی بودنه. همین کمتری می تونه بیشتری بیاره. اینطور نیست؟ @iseriousplay بازی جدی از خاطره به رویا
👏3❤1
Signed Saeid Khak Rah
در این عکس که یک سکانس مشابه از زندگی ما انسانها را در دو مقطع زمانی الان و گذشته ای نه چندان دور نشان می دهد اقلام بسیاری مثل تستر نان، تیغ ریش تراشی، لامپ، شلوار لی، کفش ورزشی، کوکاکولا و.... مشابه هستند. بسیاری اقلام ديگر هم هست که فقط در خانه های امروزی ما وجود دارد. در سالهای آینده این تصویر متفاوت تر خواهد شد. فکر می کنید سازمان ها چگونه می توانند ایده های جدیدتری برای آوردن آرامش و راحتی بیشتر به خانه ها خلق…
❤2
Signed Saeid Khak Rah
همه می دونیم که هوشمندانه کار کردن از سخت کار کردن بهتره. این هم قدرت نقد قوی نیاز دارد و هم توان خلاقیت بسیار بالا. اما بر خلاف تصور عوام به امکانات فراوان، پول زیاد و وقت کافی نیاز ندارد. در واقع بسیاری از محصولاتی که بازار می بینیم و سولوشن هایی که در سازمان ها بکار گرفته می شوند خیلی ساده خلق شده و تکامل یافته اند. چیزی که نیاز داریم اینست که مایندست خلاقانه و نقادانه را در خود خوب پرورش دهیم. باید یاد بگیریم چطو…
👍3
Signed Saeid Khak Rah
بسیاری از مشکلات سازمانی ریشه های ساختاری دارند. هر چقدر هم تلاش کنیم نمی توان آنها بموقع یافت و با چند دستور سطحی حل کرد. چون در جای جای شرکت بطور پنهانی ریشه دوانده اند. ولی چگونه می توان چنین مشکلات ساختاری را بدون تاخیر یافت و برای حل آنها راه حلی اساسی ساخت؟ @iseriousplay بازی جدی لوپ
❤3
Signed Saeid Khak Rah
هر جایی میخوای باشی تصور کن قبلا اونجا بودی و روزی تو اونجا خواهی بود. @iseriousplay بازی جدی از خاطره به رویا
❤3
Signed Saeid Khak Rah
دلافوئنته:"فکرشم نمیکردنم بچه ها اینطوری بازی کنند. اونها تو میدون همه کاره بودند". آیا شما هم با چنین شور و شوقی برای موفقیت کار می کنید؟ @iseriousplay بازی جدی از خاطره به رویا
❤2
Signed Saeid Khak Rah
لیونل اسکالونی مربی تیم ملی فوتبال آرژانتین کسی که فقط با ۱۰ سال تجربه مربیگری توانسته ۴ جام بزرگ را فتح کند. مثال واقعی کسی که رویاهای بزرگ را به خاطره تبدیل کرده است. فکر می کنید بتونه استاد خودش رو شکست بده؟ @iseriousplay بازی جدی از خاطره به رویا
Signed Saeid Khak Rah
فکر می کنید کدومشون بتونه برای تیم شما گل بزنه و کدومشون بتونه پاس گل بده؟ دریافت بروشور کلی و تفصیلی کارگاه ها با ارسال "بازی" @iseriousplay منظومه بازی های جدی مدیریتی
Signed Saeid Khak Rah
بیایید اندکی ذهن خود را از هر فکری "خالی" کنید. @iseriousplay بازی جدی از خاطره به رویا
Signed Saeid Khak Rah
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iseriousplay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بازی های جدی مدیریتی” (@iseriousplay), 2,412 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iseriousplay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.