Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for أهل السنة والجماعة

Channel

أهل السنة والجماعة

@islam_01_02_03

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,141subscribers

+100 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001994243889
TypeChannel
Username@islam_01_02_03
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/islam_01_02_03

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0341,3411,187.59 August 2026 — 1,041 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,055 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,034 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,056 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,121 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,218 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,341 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,308 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,245 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,177 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,185 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,160 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,141 subscribers1,1419 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net +100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 988–1,387 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:201,141-19
14 Sept 2026, 20:581,160-25
11 Sept 2026, 01:191,185+8
6 Sept 2026, 07:581,177-68
2 Sept 2026, 00:231,245-63
29 Aug 2026, 15:441,308-33
26 Aug 2026, 09:271,341+123
23 Aug 2026, 05:171,218+97
19 Aug 2026, 15:061,121+65
16 Aug 2026, 16:071,056+22
12 Aug 2026, 16:551,034-21
10 Aug 2026, 03:111,055+14
9 Aug 2026, 09:161,041first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 07s
Average length
1m 34s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

278 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10838.8%
💯3914.0%
🥰3713.3%
💔258.99%
👍248.63%
😍248.63%
👏217.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 278 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @islam_01_02_03. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC52 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

4🥰1😍1

Signed Musafir

6 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC83 views16 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

Да помилует Аллах ибн Раджаба аль-Ханбали, который пишет: «Были ли среди них учёные, равные Абу Ханифе, Малику и аш-Шафии, которые шли верным путем?! Как их восхвалять, когда они выше этого! И как прекрасны их учения и основы! … Или подобные Ахмаду (ибн Ханбалю), который отдал всю душу Аллаху и следовал Его пути? Клянусь Аллахом, не было среди общин подобного ибн Ханбалю - смело заявляйте об этом.» Латаиф аль-Маари

8🥰4😍4

Signed ~Ю́суф Аш'арий

6 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC68 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Многоженец подобен солнцу, который светит всем, а обычный муж это фонарь в руках жены. Как вы фонарики?😂

8💯4🥰3

Signed ~Ю́суф Аш'арий

6 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC43 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @abuAshari1

Передал Анас от Посланника Аллаха (саляЛлаху алейхи ва салям), что он сказал: «Нет веры у того, кто не надежен, и нет религии у того, кто не сдерживает обещание.» Муснад имама Ахмада, хадис 12383

7💔4🥰3

Signed ~Ю́суф Аш'арий

5 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC82 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Чётко сказал наш брат☝️ Не надо быть фанатиками, я выше приводил, к чему приводит фанатичность. Даже доводило до убийства, такого не должно быть Мы одного вероубеждения, мы мусульмане

7👍4🥰4

Signed ~Ю́суф Аш'арий

5 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTC47 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @otufh

Никогда бы не подумал, что человек может быть настолько фанатичен своим убеждениям, что бы нарушать договор. Те, к кому я обращаюсь - прекрасно знают ситуацию, а я объясню: Один брат, ашарит, выйграл на конкурсе книгу, но ему её не отдали из-за того, что он не муфтиятовский, а саму книгу отдали другому человеку. Тот, кто так поступил - совершил зло, зульм и ненависть на своего брата по вере. Разве есть разница в то

8👏4👍3

Signed ~Ю́суф Аш'арий

5 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC57 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @hanafischool

Опасность гыбы: наказание, показанное Пророку ﷺ Передаётся от Анаса ибн Малика (да будет доволен им Аллах), что Посланник Аллаха ﷺ сказал: «Когда меня вознесли (в ночь Мираджа), я прошёл мимо людей, у которых были медные когти. Они разрывали ими свои лица и груди. Я спросил: “Кто это, о Джибриль?” Он ответил: “Это те, кто поедал мясо людей (то есть занимался гыбой) и посягал на их честь”». (Сунан Абу Дауд) عَنْ أَن

5👏2🥰2

Signed ~Ю́суф Аш'арий

5 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC80 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Передал Ибн Са'ад в своем Табакъате по иснаду, в котором нет проблем, что Имам Абу Ханифа видел Анаса ибн Малика, основополагающее мнение, что Имам Абу Ханифа видел Сподвижников Посланник Аллаха ﷺ сказал: «Наилучший среди таби'инов человек по имени Увейс». А Увейс, как известно, лишь встречался со Сподвижником при жизни, но не передавал никаких Хадисов. Из этого следует, что даже если считать, что якобы Имам Абу Ха

7😍2🥰1

Signed ~Ю́суф Аш'арий

4 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC82 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Один невежда написал мне: «Имам Абу Ханифа слабый передатчик»😆 Комментарии вам лучше не видеть, его все ТУПЫМ обозвали)

👍8👏6💯2

Signed ~Ю́суф Аш'арий

4 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC90 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Хафиз Абуль-Хаджадж аль-Миззи аш-Шафии (654-742 гг.х) передает в «Тахзиб аль-Камаль»: قال : سمعت يَحْيَى بن معين ، يَقُولُ : سمعت يَحْيَى بن سعيد القطان ، يَقُولُ : لا نكذب الله ما سمعنا أحسن من رأي أبي حنيفة ، وقد أخذنا بأكثر أقواله ، قال يَحْيَى بن معين : وكَانَ يَحْيَى بن سعيد يذهب فِي الفتوى إِلَى قول الكوفيين ، ويختار قوله من أقوالهم ، ويتبع رأيه من بين أصحابه «Передается от Яхьи ибн Маина, который сказал, что

💯53👍2👏1😍1

Signed ~Ю́суф Аш'арий

4 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC61 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @bloknotik_muslimaVoice message

Оставь их и спасайся сам Абу Хамид аль-Газали (رحمه الله)

5💯2🥰2👍1

Signed ~Ю́суф Аш'арий

4 Aug 2026, 04:40 UTC87 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Передал Абу Ханифа 🌟 от АбдуЛлаха бин Хариса🌟 сподвижника Пророка🌟 🪶«Тот кто изучал фикх в религии Аллаҳа , берет Аллаҳ на Себя заботу о нем , и он получает ризк с той стороны, откуда он его не ожидал.» 🌿

8💯5🥰5👏1

Signed ~Ю́суф Аш'арий

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @islam_01_02_03. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أهل السنة والجماعة” (@islam_01_02_03), 1,141 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/islam_01_02_03.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.