Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пульс ИТ-Профсоюза

Channel

Пульс ИТ-Профсоюза

@itunion_pulse

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,476subscribers

+659 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003875998576
TypeChannel
Username@itunion_pulse
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/itunion_pulse

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8172,4762,146.56 August 2026 — 1,817 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,817 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,823 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,832 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,052 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,146 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,189 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,221 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,400 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,437 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,458 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,476 subscribers6 August 20263 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 28 days, net +659. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,718–2,575 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 09:562,476+18
31 Aug 2026, 03:442,458+21
27 Aug 2026, 22:362,437+37
24 Aug 2026, 16:242,400+179
21 Aug 2026, 10:142,221+32
18 Aug 2026, 17:052,189+43
15 Aug 2026, 16:382,146+94
12 Aug 2026, 14:552,052+220
9 Aug 2026, 11:531,832+9
6 Aug 2026, 19:201,823+6
6 Aug 2026, 06:501,817no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:011,817first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

904 reactions across 20 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬48854.0%
😨10511.6%
😱677.41%
🥴434.76%
😁343.76%
😢333.65%
💩272.99%
👍212.32%
🖕161.77%
🤡161.77%
🤯101.11%
🤔60.664%
🥰60.664%
50.553%
👎50.553%
🤮50.553%
🏆40.442%
30.332%
💔30.332%
🤷‍♂30.332%
3 further kinds40.442%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,029 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC≈1,110 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#ВТБ, сообщают о массовом выводе с удаленки @itunion_feedback_bot

🤬40🤮21😁1😢1

7 Aug 2026, 02:14 UTC≈1,120 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Сбер, сообщают о массовом выводе с удаленки @itunion_feedback_bot

🤬39🤮21😢1

6 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC≈1,240 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#РБК, принуждение к увольнению (3 оклада) @itunion_feedback_bot

🤬18👍7🤯1

2 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC≈2,560 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Positive_Technologies, принуждают подписать увольнение по соглашению сторон. @itunion_feedback_bot

🤬43😁64😢4🤔3🤯2

31 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC≈2,730 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Posiflora, принуждение к увольнению без выплат @itunion_feedback_bot

🤬22😨6👍2

31 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC≈2,700 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#МВидео, сотрудникам с удаленкой массово предлагают новые допники с выходом в офис @itunion_feedback_bot

😨27🤬16👍3

31 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC≈2,790 views80 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Тбанк, принуждение к увольнению без доп. выплат @itunion_feedback_bot

😱43🤬25🥴5👍3🤔3😨1

31 Jul 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,590 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Umbrella_IT, принуждение к увольнению без доп. выплат @itunion_feedback_bot

🤬27😁61😢1😨1

30 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTC≈2,820 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Инвитро, принуждение к увольнению ПСЖ @itunion_feedback_bot

🤬33😢3🤣2😨1

30 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC≈2,770 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Расчетные_решения #Сбер принуждение к увольнению ПСЖ @itunion_feedback_bot

🤬35😢3👍2😨2💩1

30 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC≈2,590 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Датакаталог, принуждение к увольнению ПСЖ @itunion_feedback_bot

🤬21👍2😢2😨1

29 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC≈2,600 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Centicore_Group, принуждение сотрудника к увольнению (соглашение 1 оклад). После отказа - попытка вызвать в офис с удаленки. @itunion_feedback_bot

🤬30🤯4😁31🤮1😨1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @itunion_pulse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пульс ИТ-Профсоюза” (@itunion_pulse), 2,476 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itunion_pulse.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.