Channel
@ivlieva_lili
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
199subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002084429724 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ivlieva_lili |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ivlieva_lili |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 21:23 | 199 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 200 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 201 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 200 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 202 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 202 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
49 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 40.8% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 28.6% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 26.5% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 4.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Первая моя ню-фотосъемка. Голое тело — это не стыдно. Это честно. На этой съёмке была задача — встретиться с собой в том виде, в котором я есть сейчас. Со всеми изъянами, складками и растяжками. Фотография может исцелить? Думаю, да) Если принять себя на фото, возможно примешь себя и в жизни. Не для лайков. Для ощущения свободы. Чтобы увидеть, что моё тело — не только список недостатков. Это моя красота, моя истори…
❤12🔥4
Video message, posted without a caption
😁2
https://telegram.me/doveli_do_psihologa/67 У меня временно вдохновение открылось, пост за постом прям каждый день 😂 как теперь определиться какой тгк «вести». Личный живой простой про жизнь или «экспертный о психологии». Или смешать всё в кучу 🤯
Кто знает проверенного хорошего дерматолога для 🐾 в мск? Никак не решу проблему с выдиранием шерсти у Ракель 😪
А я напомню, что со мной работает в паре супер телесный психолог Дина 🔥🔥🔥 Отправляю смело своих клиенток, радуюсь результатам вместе ♥️ Пс: не все решается только через 🧠
Если вдруг тебя тоже разбудят ради доставки шкафа в 6 утра в субботу и срочно надо поднять себе настроение - рекомендую лайфхак 😂
👍1
Инфоцинганке быть!👩💻 Все стадии отрицания были пройдены. ⛔️ Я долго отрицала онлайн курсы. Думала: «Я же психолог, серьёзный специалист, а не это всё» 🤓 А потом поняла: это не про развод (или не только про него)). Это про умение переупаковать знания так, чтобы их поняли и приняли🧠+ окружение, поддержка 🔥 Обсуждая с @Valentina_Rubenovna тему обучения подростков решили сделать КУРС. Но для родителей. Потому что ро…
🔥5❤3👍1
Деревенский июнь подходит к концу 🏡 Работаю ежедневно, но «вайб» отдыха чувствуется. А вы где тусуетесь?)
🔥5
🚨Кто тут не родитель, не читать )) Близкие знают, что последний год я занималась активно здоровьем дочери. И так как из-за этого она много пропустила в школе - образовались большие провалы в знаниях. И мне подсказали, что существует программа «погружения в предмет», где мол за 12 часов обучают программе за весь год 😱 Я скептик) пока не попробую - не поверю! И мой шок был в шоке😨 Ева не ходя толком ни разу на химию…
👍7
Я тут другу жаловалась на ненависть к спорту. Знаю как полезно, нужно, движение это жизнь и тп. Нооооо Сложно себя уговорить порой. Говорит, потому что мои мотивации все внешние (приятная компания, виды, обязательства перед тренером, здоровье и пример для дочери и тд), а мол нужны внутренние 🤔 Как себя убеждаете без краткосрочной цели работать на долгосрочную? Или приносит удовольствие спорт?
❤3
💡 Познавательно, посмотри. Про самые эффективные стратегии в жизни: https://youtu.be/IOfxvsdBpDQ?si=tQVFlSUnufv1AJ4Y
👍4❤2
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ivlieva_lili. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❔Лили Ивлиева” (@ivlieva_lili), 199 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ivlieva_lili.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.