Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Жгейн

Channel

Жгейн

@jenya_geyn

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,037subscribers

-196 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001506489114
TypeChannel
Username@jenya_geyn
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/jenya_geyn

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,0376,2336,1357 August 2026 — 6,233 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,233 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,230 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,225 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,219 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,210 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,205 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,198 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,200 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,192 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,183 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,170 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,164 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,152 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,138 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,118 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,095 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,080 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,067 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,058 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,049 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,046 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,041 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,039 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,037 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -196. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,008–6,262 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 00:506,037-2
2 Nov 2026, 19:096,039-2
30 Oct 2026, 15:496,041-5
28 Oct 2026, 00:566,046-3
24 Oct 2026, 21:466,049-9
21 Oct 2026, 23:496,058-9
16 Oct 2026, 06:186,067-13
13 Oct 2026, 01:376,080-15
6 Oct 2026, 08:006,095-23
29 Sept 2026, 00:226,118-20
18 Sept 2026, 18:426,138-14
14 Sept 2026, 18:416,152-12
10 Sept 2026, 21:596,164-6
5 Sept 2026, 19:216,170-13
1 Sept 2026, 12:256,183-9
29 Aug 2026, 20:346,192-8
26 Aug 2026, 12:346,200+2
23 Aug 2026, 03:156,198-7
19 Aug 2026, 22:346,205-5
16 Aug 2026, 17:186,210first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 5 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.6%
avg views ÷ 6,037 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,430
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held23 (5 March 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total2,850
Reactions total75
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 17:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 19s
Average length
3m 10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,491 reactions across 23 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,02468.7%
🔥1409.39%
👍805.37%
💯493.29%
❤‍🔥422.82%
🥰362.41%
🙏241.61%
😍181.21%
😨120.805%
👌90.604%
🙈90.604%
🤡80.537%
✍60.402%
🍓60.402%
🕊60.402%
😁60.402%
💋50.335%
😇30.201%
😎30.201%
👎10.067%
4 further kinds40.268%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,491 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

22 Oct 2026, 18:54 UTC≈1,270 views22 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Девочки, новый Shorts уже на канале 💄 Rouge Dior Forever Liquid Sequin Duo, оттенок 962 — моя красная любовь: сначала насыщенный цвет, потом сияющий топ с блёстками. Губы готовы за минуту ❤️ Товар отметила прямо в видео — жмите на метку, там можно посмотреть и купить 🛍 Смотреть: https://youtube.com/shorts/ZL1z7YAho84 Как вам такой красный? 😍

❤16😍5🔥1

Signed Мой блог постинг

21 Oct 2026, 15:16 UTC≈1,580 views53 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Девочки, вышло новое видео ❤️ Собираемся вместе, делаем макияж и честно болтаем: для чего вообще снимать видео на YouTube в 2026? Я рассказала то, о чём редко говорю вслух: ✨ почему мой канал — это буквально дневник моей жизни ✨ как подписчица Полина однажды спасла меня в Америке ✨ про пресс-туры, хейтеров и почему сейчас хотят настоящих, а не идеальных ✨ и главный бенефит, ради которого стоит начать снимать в любом…

❤45🥰8

Signed Мой блог постинг

30 Sept 2026, 11:48 UTC≈2,200 views26 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://youtu.be/71ikebWukl0?is=_p0gk4dnRa31VjlD

❤‍🔥15🙏6❤5

Signed Jenya Geyn

29 Sept 2026, 11:53 UTC≈2,250 views20 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://youtu.be/DFODCJVKNOc?is=VS6lyG1Z8vyZ3fFD 🫶🏻

❤‍🔥8🤡4❤3😎3🙏2

Signed Jenya Geyn

16 Sept 2026, 23:56 UTC≈2,890 views17 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://youtu.be/xPTy4wl5b00?is=L_wBe9OJtXMQamzP Обожаю! Гениально ❤️‍🔥

❤12🔥5

Signed Jenya Geyn

4 Sept 2026, 20:34 UTC≈4,080 views41 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Наболело..

❤24😨12👍4💅1

Signed Jenya Geyn

2 Sept 2026, 11:10 UTC≈3,570 views47 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://youtu.be/7ttKdHk7LN4?is=4XSbPTrsiLyzB2a8

❤35❤‍🔥8😁3👍1

Signed Jenya Geyn

31 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC≈3,490 views52 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Ответы на ваши вопросы😈 1ч. деньги? Содержание? Ссоры с мужем, Советы..+ собираемся вместе👗 https://youtu.be/rYI5bVEnBCo

❤43❤‍🔥3🕊3😇3

Signed Jenya Geyn

12 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTC≈4,390 views84 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://youtu.be/xhEqObyUlyM?is=8T41EuOsMvHpkSpH Новое видео 🩵❤️🩵

❤59👍12🔥12😍1

Signed Jenya Geyn

7 Jul 2026, 21:48 UTC≈4,400 views30 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://youtu.be/a4RUru9C4cA?is=WXowJYscX6WbnwZR Я не особо люблю его, но интервью получилось интересным, если убрать его причуды…

👍20🍓6❤3🗿1

Signed Jenya Geyn

1 Jun 2026, 22:08 UTC≈5,050 views27 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://youtu.be/iYGG2DcJcZg?si=Fue9XF5VrdaqAKd7 Прекрасное видео💙

❤25🔥1🙏1

Signed Jenya

24 Apr 2026, 20:27 UTC≈5,820 views112 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://youtu.be/tk5vSyFiLiw?si=EyOfUV0qkDJ_FwvB

❤69🥰24😍11💋5👍3

Signed Jenya

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @jenya_geyn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Метод Мироневич. Из XXXL в S
@marymironevich · 24,464
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Жгейн” (@jenya_geyn), 6,037 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jenya_geyn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.