Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jirzik

Channel

Jirzik

@jirzik_jirzik

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

2,365subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002194387087
TypeChannel
Username@jirzik_jirzik
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jirzik_jirzik

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,3572,3722,364.56 August 2026 — 2,372 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,372 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,371 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,368 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,366 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,363 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,357 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,358 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,360 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,367 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,368 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,367 subscribers19 September 2026 — 2,365 subscribers2,3656 August 202619 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 44 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,355–2,374 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 10:202,365-2
15 Sept 2026, 06:562,367-1
11 Sept 2026, 15:182,368+1
6 Sept 2026, 23:382,367+7
2 Sept 2026, 07:332,360+2
27 Aug 2026, 19:122,358+1
24 Aug 2026, 22:172,357-6
21 Aug 2026, 10:272,363-3
18 Aug 2026, 09:342,366-2
12 Aug 2026, 14:282,368-3
9 Aug 2026, 21:522,371-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:172,372no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:092,372first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

588 reactions across 18 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12821.8%
👍12320.9%
🔥10417.7%
🙏7512.8%
🥰294.93%
😁193.23%
😭142.38%
🤡122.04%
🤯122.04%
👻91.53%
🕊81.36%
😨81.36%
💯71.19%
👎50.85%
😢50.85%
😱50.85%
🤔50.85%
🌭40.68%
👏40.68%
❤‍🔥30.51%
5 further kinds91.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 588 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC558 views110 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет, у меня случилась травма - перелом левого запястья 🤳со смещением - так что ближайшие 5-8 недель я однорукий Джо) соответственно работать на компе получается заметно медленнее, так как во-первых, я привык делать это двумя руками, а во-вторых некоторые вещи (например при рисовании карт) я вообще пока не понимаю как делать одной рукой. Так что если вы от меня что-то ждёте, возможно придётся подождать чуть до

🙏7516😭14😢5

1 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC≈1,050 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

А какое 🥈второе по популярности имя у новорождённых девочек было в России в эти годы? 😉

  1. Анна29%
  2. Мария22%
  3. Ева21%
  4. Варвара8%
  5. Василиса9%
  6. Виктория11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤯12👻9👍5😇21👀1🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,420 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @intim_linguisticsPoll

слово "вульва"

  1. употребляю часто4%
  2. употребляю редко23%
  3. знаю, но не употребляю62%
  4. не знаю 🤷‍♀️3%
  5. звучит нейтрально25%
  6. звучит слишком по-медицински 💉43%
  7. звучит грубовато15%
  8. другое (про восприятие)3%

The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🥰4💯2

28 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,330 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Лингвисты, как врачи, для них нет запретных слов 😏🙊

6💯2😁1

26 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC≈1,370 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @myslveka

​​Лингвисты выбрали самое красивое слово в мире. Сможете выговорить с первого раза? Специалисты платформы для изучения языков Babbel впервые провели конкурс на самое красивое слово в мире. Они собрали 223 варианта из более чем 75 языков, а международное жюри оценило их звучание, смысл, редкость и культурную значимость. Победителем стало слово “кайтиакитанга” (kaitiakitanga) из языка маори – коренного народа Новой Зе

23👍9🔥5😁5👎2🥰1🦄1

22 Jul 2026, 20:45 UTC≈1,240 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @pomogite_slovarju

Для меня загадка, каким образом и зачем СМИ каждый раз раздувают «лингвистические сенсации». То внезапно «горячее кофе разрешили», то ударение в йогурте «перенесли на второй слог», то «узаконили звОнит». На этот раз сенсационным стал глагол МАХАТЬ. Оказывается, теперь «В России глагол “махаю” признали литературной нормой» – именно так, ни больше ни меньше😁 Коллеги-лингвисты уже исчерпывающе высказались о «махаю-гей

👍3014🕊8💯3🤔1

15 Jul 2026, 16:33 UTC≈1,610 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Звук [j] (й, йот) в русском языке может передаваться как минимум 4 способами: й, йотированные гласные, ь и ъ. Рассмотрим их по позициям: ● Vj#, VjC (между гласной и концом слова/согласной) – с помощью й: войн, мой ● #jV (перед гласной в начале слова) – специальными йотированными гласными (фактически слоговыми знаками для слогов j + гласная), в иностранных словах может также быть йе и йо (йети, йод) ● VjV (между глас

🔥20👍156

6 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC≈2,040 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Куда вы поставите ударение в слове ЛОХИ (например, во фразе «Эти лохи ничего не поняли»)

  1. лохИ6%
  2. лОхи84%
  3. ой, и так, и так вроде могу 👀9%
  4. нии знаю 🤷‍♀️1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥8

1 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC≈2,370 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, если кому нравится смотреть в 🌿 природе на 🦜птиц и он каждый раз думает: "Хм, это лунь там парит или 🦅канюк", или вообще паче чаяния бёрд-вотчит вовсю, то есть классный канал Ивана Калабушева, которому (Ивану) всего 15 лет, но 📸 съёмки такие, что хоть сейчас в National Geographic. Заодно, он показывает процесс съёмки, рассказывает 🪶как снимать, ведёт 📝дневники наблюдений, в общем, вот это всё! 💜

🔥1710🤔3👍1

27 Jun 2026, 10:47 UTC≈1,870 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Думаю, многим из вас знаком предмет на картинке 👆. Это небольшой прямоугольник, вырезанный из пенки и крепящейся на попе резинкой. Используется (например, в 🏕 походах) как сиденье при сидении на холодной почве / брёвнах / камнях. Интересен он тем, что в русском языке для него существует более 20 разных названий и как будто нельзя сказать, что какое-то из них основное. Некоторые слова либо имеют также значение «турис

🔥15🌭41😁1

19 Jun 2026, 19:11 UTC≈2,590 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В 1944 часть цезских селений в приказном порядке была переселена в Чечню, на место выселенных чеченцев. После возвращения последних, в 1958 г., некоторые из них вернулись обратно в горы, часть переселились на север Дагестана, как говорят здесь, «на плоскость». Они основали селения: ● гунзибцы — Стальское, Комсомольское и Шушановка в Кизилюртовском р-не ● хваршинцы — Октябрьское, Первомайское, Муцалаул в Хасавюртовск

👍22🔥93

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @jirzik_jirzik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTCAnonymous Quiz470 voters

А какое 🥈второе по популярности имя у новорождённых девочек было в России в эти годы? 😉

  1. Анна29%
  2. Мария22%
  3. Ева21%
  4. Варвара8%
  5. Василиса9%
  6. Виктория11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTCAnonymous Poll654 voters

слово "вульва"

  1. употребляю часто4%
  2. употребляю редко23%
  3. знаю, но не употребляю62%
  4. не знаю 🤷‍♀️3%
  5. звучит нейтрально25%
  6. звучит слишком по-медицински 💉43%
  7. звучит грубовато15%
  8. другое (про восприятие)3%

The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTCAnonymous Poll528 voters

Куда вы поставите ударение в слове ЛОХИ (например, во фразе «Эти лохи ничего не поняли»)

  1. лохИ6%
  2. лОхи84%
  3. ой, и так, и так вроде могу 👀9%
  4. нии знаю 🤷‍♀️1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Jun 2026, 10:21 UTCAnonymous Quiz2,380 voters approx.

Забавы ради: угадайте (не подглядывая) город по топ-5 национальностей-1926: русские 52,4%, армяне 12,1%, персы 4,3%, тюрки 4%, украинцы 2,5%

  1. Сочи19%
  2. Нахичевань15%
  3. Ашхабад12%
  4. Астрахань13%
  5. Душанбе8%
  6. Ростов-на-Дону18%
  7. Фрунзе6%
  8. Красноводск10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 May 2026, 20:17 UTCAnonymous Poll436 voters

куда вы поставите ударение в единственном и множественном числах слова ВСПОЛОХ

  1. всполОх, всполОхи6%
  2. вспОлох, вспОлохи82%
  3. всполОх, вспОлохи4%
  4. вспОлох, всполОхи3%
  5. ой, совсем не знаю 🤷‍♀️2%
  6. я говорю это слово, пусть и редко20%
  7. никогда не говорю 🙊21%
  8. иное💃0%

The shares total 138%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 May 2026, 12:17 UTCAnonymous Poll1,050 voters approx.

Как бы вы сказали?

  1. нИшевый аромат86%
  2. нишевОй аромат3%
  3. Могу и так и так2%
  4. Вообще не использую это слово15%
  5. Затрудняюсь ответить2%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Коряков, Юрий Борисович (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…{{примечания}} == Ссылки == {{Навигация}} * Научно-популярный [https://t.me/jirzik_jirzik телеграм-канал Jirzik] * [http://www.pravmir…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jirzik” (@jirzik_jirzik), 2,365 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jirzik_jirzik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.