Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kapil Bajaj supporter channel

Channel

Kapil Bajaj supporter channel

@kapilbajaj

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,241subscribers

-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001197643220
TypeChannel
Username@kapilbajaj
Created27 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kapilbajaj

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,2413,2953,2687 August 2026 — 3,295 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,295 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,292 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,285 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,278 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,271 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,268 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,259 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,257 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,252 subscribers5 September 2026 — 3,254 subscribers10 September 2026 — 3,242 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,241 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 38 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,233–3,303 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 17:593,241-1
10 Sept 2026, 01:563,242-12
5 Sept 2026, 02:573,254+2
1 Sept 2026, 12:143,252-5
29 Aug 2026, 20:533,257-2
26 Aug 2026, 20:343,259-9
23 Aug 2026, 09:553,268-3
19 Aug 2026, 18:453,271-7
16 Aug 2026, 21:573,278-7
13 Aug 2026, 04:153,285-7
9 Aug 2026, 21:533,292-3
7 Aug 2026, 01:153,295no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:063,295first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC38 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ViroLIEgy

While RFK Jr. urges parents to vaccinate children against measles, history reveals that for decades parents and physicians largely viewed measles as a routine childhood illness—and policymakers questioned whether a mass vaccination campaign was even necessary. The historical record shows that the modern portrayal of a deadly scourge is a manufactured illusion—one created to justify a product, not to address a crisis

Signed Eklavya Neelsagar

6 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC159 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Eklavya Neelsagar

6 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC138 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ViroLIEgyPhoto

If there was any doubt about Robert Kennedy Jr.'s "pro-vaccine" stance, he ended it Sunday by urging parents to vaccinate their children against measles with the MMR vaccine. Someone truly opposed to vaccination and its inherent dangers would never make that recommendation. RFK Jr. was never the leader of the anti-vaccine movement. It is time to see him for what he has always been: a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Sour

Signed Eklavya Neelsagar

5 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC205 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://tinyurl.com/4nteh59f https://tinyurl.com/3b2sm45h

Signed Eklavya Neelsagar

5 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC195 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Can You Catch a Cold? Untold History & Human Experiments (by Daniel Roytas) https://tinyurl.com/bdzj78hz https://t.me/kapilbajaj/18318 Fauci’s First Fraud https://tinyurl.com/3brwfrax The Viral Delusion Ep 1: The Tragic Pseudoscience of SARS-CoV-2 https://tinyurl.com/yt63tu4w

Signed Eklavya Neelsagar

5 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC196 viewsread 7 August 2026

DNA is a mathematical model of a SALT of DNA (not at all the same as the theoretical DNA). The double helix was a sketch made by Crick's wife. There is nothing "real" about any of this. That's why despite billions plowed in "genetic" research nothing useful came of it. They can't even tell you apart from your dog in a blind DNA test. - Sasha Latypova, 12 April 2025 https://x.com/sasha_latypova/status/19109177381152

Signed Eklavya Neelsagar

5 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC189 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

I'm calling BS on DNA. This is Crick & Watson, two shifty scammers of history if ever there was. "DNA" is imaginary and the "DNA tests" are performed robotically following set procedures to arrive at set results. Like all "medical tests" and most "scientific tests". DNA does not actually exist. It's another modelled conception of scientism. A big trick. You can tell by their expressions. https://x.com/James_Hawk

Signed Eklavya Neelsagar

4 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC232 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @johnblaidtts

Regarding the latest news with Fauci, a statement by Sasha Latypova that I agree with: Here is my prediction - nothing will happen, beyond Rand Paul posturing and Fauci saying he can’t recall anything. Even if Fauci says something else, it doesn’t matter. No accountability, no justice for the victims and no change to how HHS is going to continue to lie to all of us while funding more of the same “fast-tracked” poiso

Signed Eklavya Neelsagar

4 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC726 viewsread 7 August 2026

दिल्ली सरकार द्वारा 2 अगस्त 2026 को लॉन्च की गई "दिल्ली लक्ष्मी योजना" पूर्णतः CBDC-आधारित है. इसमें कथित "लाभार्थी" को जो कुछ भी मिलेगा वो CBDC या "प्रोग्रामेबल डिजिटल टोकन" के रूप में ही मिलेगा. कैश में या प्रचलित मुद्रा में कुछ भी नहीं मिलेगा. जो कुछ "लाभार्थी" को दिया जाएगा वो उसके "CBDC वॉलेट" ही में दिया जाएगा. CBDC वॉलेट "स्मार्ट फ़ोन" में ही खुल सकता है. इसलिए आवेदक के पास "स्मार्ट फ़ोन" होना भी ज़रूरी है.

Signed Eklavya Neelsagar

3 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC752 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"दिल्ली लक्ष्मी योजना" के तहत आर्थिक सहायता "CBDC" (प्रोग्रामेबल डिजिटल टोकन) में मिलेगी. इन प्रोग्रामेबल डिजिटल टोकनों का इस्तेमाल सरकार द्वारा अनुमोदित चीज़ों पर ही किया जा सकेगा. यदि इनका इस्तेमाल किसी ऐसी चीज़ पर करने का प्रयास किया गया जो सरकार द्वारा अनुमोदित नहीं है तो ट्रांजैक्शन अपने आप ब्लॉक हो जाएगा. https://tinyurl.com/3fe9tbb4 (साभार @x13x33) https://tinyurl.com/56yujyxr https://t.me/kapilbajaj/19678

Signed Eklavya Neelsagar

3 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC688 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"दिल्ली लक्ष्मी योजना" के लिए आवेदन करने वालों को इन "जिम्मेदारियों और सहमति" घोषणाओं को स्वीकार करना होगा. इनमें एक यह है कि आवेदक को अपने परिवार के सभी बच्चों को सभी वैक्सीनें लगवाना पड़ेंगी, जिनमें 14 वर्ष से अधिक आयु की लड़कियों के लिए HPV की वैक्सीन भी शामिल है. https://tinyurl.com/3fe9tbb4 (साभार @x13x33) https://tinyurl.com/56yujyxr https://t.me/kapilbajaj/19678

Signed Eklavya Neelsagar

3 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC675 viewsread 7 August 2026

तीन से ज्यादा बच्चों वाली महिलाएं होंगी बाहर, कैश नहीं मिलेगा एक भी पैसा, दिल्ली लक्ष्मी योजना में हर महीने ₹2500 की मदद (जनसत्ता, 29 जुलाई 2026) दिल्ली सरकार ने 'दिल्ली लक्ष्मी योजना' को मंजूरी दे दी है। इसके तहत EWS (आर्थिक रूप से कमज़ोर वर्ग) की पात्र महिलाओं को हर महीने ₹2500 की सहायता मिलेगी लेकिन नकद राशि नहीं दी जाएगी। योजना का लाभ केवल उन महिलाओं को मिलेगा- -जिनकी आयु 21 से 60 वर्ष के बीच हो। -जिनके परिवा

Signed Eklavya Neelsagar

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kapilbajaj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Disaster News
@Disaster_News · 27,010
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
COVID VACCINE VICTIMS AND FAMILIES
@covid19vaccinevictims · 38,415
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
English Grammar in Use
@English_Grammar_in_Use_5th · 34,263
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kapil Bajaj supporter channel” (@kapilbajaj), 3,241 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kapilbajaj.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.