Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,521–8,730 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 03:39
8,545
-3
3 Nov 2026, 03:57
8,548
-7
31 Oct 2026, 02:47
8,555
-2
27 Oct 2026, 19:45
8,557
-10
24 Oct 2026, 12:18
8,567
-4
21 Oct 2026, 14:59
8,571
-14
18 Oct 2026, 20:56
8,585
-3
15 Oct 2026, 22:46
8,588
+4
13 Oct 2026, 02:21
8,584
-10
6 Oct 2026, 08:22
8,594
-17
29 Sept 2026, 14:16
8,611
-16
19 Sept 2026, 12:20
8,627
-9
14 Sept 2026, 19:16
8,636
-4
10 Sept 2026, 21:58
8,640
-12
5 Sept 2026, 22:59
8,652
-6
1 Sept 2026, 20:44
8,658
-4
30 Aug 2026, 01:04
8,662
-6
27 Aug 2026, 07:54
8,668
+1
24 Aug 2026, 04:08
8,667
-4
20 Aug 2026, 03:48
8,671
first reading
Engagement
141 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.26%
avg views ÷ 8,545 subscribers
Avg views / post
535
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 141 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
141 (30 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
19,248
Reactions total
264
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 23:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,850
Videos
≈8
Links
≈9,930
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,086 reactions across 137 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
221
20.3%
😈
132
12.2%
💯
111
10.2%
🤬
106
9.76%
❤
93
8.56%
🤡
59
5.43%
👏
50
4.60%
👎
45
4.14%
🔥
41
3.78%
😁
34
3.13%
🤔
33
3.04%
🖕
23
2.12%
🤯
22
2.03%
🤣
20
1.84%
🤪
18
1.66%
🙏
16
1.47%
💩
11
1.01%
🤮
7
0.645%
🤷♂
7
0.645%
👻
6
0.552%
14 further kinds
31
2.85%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 138 of the 141 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,086 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (2.78%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
The Syria Scam
The War on Iraq was never about “Weapons of Mass Destruction”,
The war on Syria was never about “Chemical Weapons” or a “brutal dictator”.
Similarly the war on Iran is not about enriched uranium.
In each case (and many others), however, fake pretexts such as those listed were and are being used to fabricate consent from consistently credulous Western populations for Supreme International Criminalit…
Syria’s History of Anti-Colonialist Resistance Is Still under Attack
After 75 years of CIA and MI6 destabilisation campaigns, Syria is still fighting the war to retain a national identity that has withstood all enemies.
Read here: https://www.globalresearch.ca/syria-history-anti-colonialist-resistance-under-attack/5945343
Poland’s Deployment Near Russia’s Kaliningrad Fuels European Militarization
By deploying the special forces unit GROM and additional police anti-terrorist units to the border with Russia’s Kaliningrad region in an operation to prevent alleged planned diversions, Poland seeks to strengthen its position as a leading military force on NATO’s eastern flank, which further strains relations with Moscow, encourages Europe’…
How China Accidentally Broke the West’s Arms Trade Monopoly
While US has recently boosted its conventional weapon exports, China is quietly and indirectly undercutting American dominance
Read here: https://www.asia-pacificresearch.com/how-china-accidentally-broke-the-wests-arms-trade-monopoly/5633745
US-Iran Tensions Escalate as Israel Signals Possible New Offensive; Fears of Wider Regional War Mount
The US midterm election is now over, and the Republican party, the ruling party, has lost by a landslide. US President Donald Trump had said previously that he would wait until after the US election to make a decision to attack Iran.
Read here: https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-iran-tensions-escalate-israel-signals-…
Pulling the Funding: Trump, Israel and US Military Assistance
In a telephone interview on Fox News on the morning of November 3, President Donald Trump revealed that a deal had been struck with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to cease the annual provision of US$3.8 billion in military assistance after 2026.
Read here: https://www.globalresearch.ca/pulling-the-funding-trump-israel-and-us-military-assistanc…
Last Night’s “Blue Wave” Election Means Nothing if We Don’t Stop the NDAA
As taxpayers, we are funding our own endgame, but we don't have to.
Read here: https://www.globalresearch.ca/blue-wave-means-nothing-if-we-dont-stop-ndaa/5945227
Europe and America’s Dystopian Nightmare Must End Now
Why Europe is crumbling and what it means for America
Read here: https://www.globalresearch.ca/europe-america-dystopian-nightmare-must-end-now/5945152
No President, No Election Will Change US Commitment to Wage Aggressive Wars — USMC Veteran
“Each US presidential administration this 21st century took office promising voters they would end US wars of aggression and interventions around the globe only to further expand existing wars and start new wars once in office,” says Berletic.
Basically, no matter who ends up in the US Congress as a result of the current midt…
Russia-Africa Summit Concludes with the Signing of Key Joint Agreements. The Moscow Declaration
The three-day meeting brought together members of the African Union and the Russian Federation pledging to enhance their cooperation in the areas of economic development, communications and technological advancement
Read here: https://www.globalresearch.ca/third-russia-africa-summit-key-joint-agreements/5945170
Constitutional Reform in France: Giving the People the Last Word
The French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of 1789 places the principle of all sovereignty “essentially in the Nation”, an abstract entity that speaks only through its representatives. The Constitution of 1958 tries to reconcile that tradition with the sovereignty of the people: under its Article 3, “national sovereignty belongs to …
Russia-Africa Summit 2026: Outcomes and Future Perspectives
The late October Russia-Africa Summit consolidated Russia’s economic and geopolitical influence on the continent through the signing of 146 documents, building on 240 agreements from 2023 and 92 from 2019, with over 3,500 participants from 74 countries and bilateral meetings between President Vladimir Putin and 21 African leaders.
Read here: https://www.gl…
👍4👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 141 posts we hold for @gr_crg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
The Exposé News (Official) @dailyexpose · 27,519 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel @DrMikeYeadonsolochannel · 25,917 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
Robin Monotti @robinmg · 66,964 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Children’s Health Defense @childrenshd · 52,477 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
World Doctors Alliance @worlddoctorsalliance · 74,878 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
Wide Awake Media - Official Channel @realwideawakemedia · 36,494 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
Reiner Fuellmich 🇺🇸/🇬🇧/🇦🇺 @ReinerFuellmichEnglish · 83,409 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
World Council for Health @wch_org · 34,025 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
Dr Mike Yeadon @DrMikeYeadon · 26,881 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 September 2026
Christine Anderson, MdEP (AfD) @christineanderson · 34,980 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
Child Covid Vaccine Injuries UK @childcovidvaccineinjuriesuk · 18,863 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 October 2026
Dr John B. @DrJohnB · 21,101 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Global Research” (@gr_crg), 8,545 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gr_crg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.