Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 📶درسگفتارهای جامعه شناسی

Channel

📶درسگفتارهای جامعه شناسی

@kavosh_garan

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,774subscribers

-64 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001035786100
TypeChannel
Username@kavosh_garan
Created6 April 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kavosh_garan

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,77117,83817,804.55 August 2026 — 17,838 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,838 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,832 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,833 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,831 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,833 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,829 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,831 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,824 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,825 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,826 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,829 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,824 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,818 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,815 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,819 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,814 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,815 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,808 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,812 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,816 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,819 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,820 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,811 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,813 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,810 subscribers6 September 2026 — 17,797 subscribers10 September 2026 — 17,781 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,771 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,779 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,778 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,774 subscribers17,7745 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,761–17,848 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:3817,774-4
15 Sept 2026, 20:0217,778-1
14 Sept 2026, 01:0017,779+8
12 Sept 2026, 10:4117,771-10
10 Sept 2026, 05:1617,781-16
6 Sept 2026, 21:0217,797-13
2 Sept 2026, 20:2717,810-3
1 Sept 2026, 18:5617,813+2
30 Aug 2026, 21:4717,811-9
29 Aug 2026, 19:2817,820+1
28 Aug 2026, 18:0917,819+3
27 Aug 2026, 16:2517,816+4
26 Aug 2026, 14:3417,812+4
25 Aug 2026, 14:5217,808-7
24 Aug 2026, 14:4417,815+1
22 Aug 2026, 19:2417,814-5
21 Aug 2026, 11:3817,819+4
20 Aug 2026, 13:5317,815-3
19 Aug 2026, 16:0217,818-6
18 Aug 2026, 17:4617,824first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49m 53s
Average length
6m 14s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

473 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍24852.4%
11424.1%
👎6012.7%
🙏275.71%
💯112.33%
👌71.48%
👏61.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 473 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2025 to 24 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Feb 2026, 09:08 UTC≈7,330 views53 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

تفاوت عجیب سهم طبقه متوسط در : ایران _ژاپن_آمریکا #دکتر_محمود_سریع_القلم

👍24👎1910

27 Jan 2026, 16:33 UTC≈4,960 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026

و میزان دخالت بشردوستانه در آن موارد خاص، خصوصاً شرایط دخالت نظامی، است. مهمترین دلایل قائلان به حق مذکور چیست؟ یک راه توجیه اخلاقی حقّ دخالت بشردوستانه آن است که آن را برآیند دو اصل اخلاقی دیگر بشمار می آوریم: اصل دفاع از خود، و اصل امداد به دیگری (البته هر دو اصل اخلاقی مقید به قیود و شرایط خاص هستند.) مطابق اصل دفاع از خود، اگر فرد الف به فرد بیگناه ب حمله کند تا او را به قتل برساند (یا زیانی عظیم بر او وارد

8👎2👏1

27 Jan 2026, 16:33 UTC≈9,850 views39 reactionsread 3 September 2026

راههای قانونی بکوشند آن قوانین ناعادلانه را تغییر دهند، و اگر راههای قانونی بر ایشان بسته بود، حقّ دارند که برای احترام به روح قانون از التزام به آن قوانین ناعادلانه سرباززنند، و به اصطلاح از طریق نافرمانی مدنی بکوشند وجدان اخلاقی جامعه را بیدار و حساس کنند. در هرحال، قوانین ناعادلانه ای که حقوق اساسی اقلیت را نقض می کند، ولو به تصویب اکثریت رسیده باشد، مطلقاً نمی تواند حقّ اقلیت قربانی را نسبت به کمک اعضای مسؤول جا

👍1914👎6

27 Jan 2026, 16:33 UTC≈7,690 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026

که برای سلامت شما ضروری است در اختیار شما باشد. بنابراین، آنچه بر اعضای مسؤول جامعه جهانی فرض است این است که مطمئن شوند افراد از حقوق خود آگاه هستند، و امکان واقعی احقاق حقوق خود را دارند- هرچند که ممکن است گاه به اختیار خود تصمیم بگیرند از احقاق پاره ای از حقوق خود صرفنظر کنند. اما اکنون فرض کنیم که حکومتی حقوق اساسی اقلیت را به نحو گسترده و سیستماتیک نقض می کند. در این صورت اگر اکثریت می تواند از حقوق آن اقلیت

9👎3

27 Jan 2026, 16:33 UTC≈5,070 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026

☄آیا دخالتهای بشردوستانه اخلاقاً مجاز است؟ حق مداخله بشردوستانه بیگانگان در امور داخلی کشورهای غیر دموکراتیک از چه زمانی مورد توجه و تامل فیلسوفان اخلاق و فیلسوفان و عالمان سیاست قرار گرفته است؟ مهمترین متفکران موافق و مخالف چنین مداخله ای چه کسانی بوده اند؟ نخست مایلم بر این نکته تأکید کنم که غیردموکراتیک بودن نظام سیاسی یک کشور به تنهایی شرط کافی و حتّی شرط لازم برای دخالت بشردوستانه نیست. نقض گسترده و سیستماتیک

14👎2💯1

27 Jan 2026, 16:31 UTC≈4,820 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

☄آیا دخالت های بشر دوستانه اخلاقا مجاز است ؟ گفتگو با آرش نراقی

👍52👎1

6 Jan 2026, 16:20 UTC≈6,290 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

☄فروپاشی یا تغییر؟! مهدی مطهرنیا، مسعود نیلی، علی‌نقی مشایخی، مجتبی امیری و محمد درویش 🔖اندیشکده آینده‌اندیشی سیمرغ

👎124👏2💯2

6 Jan 2026, 16:17 UTC≈6,400 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

☄فروپاشی یا تغییر؟! مهدی مطهرنیا، مسعود نیلی، علی‌نقی مشایخی، مجتبی امیری و محمد درویش 🔖اندیشکده آینده‌اندیشی سیمرغ

👎7💯21👍1

3 Jan 2026, 20:15 UTC≈7,130 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026

هر کس از انحصار کوچک خود بر پهنه ای هر چه کوچکتر دفاع می کند، این قانون بسیار آشنای جامعه شناسان علمی است: بهتر است که تو در یک پهنه کوچک دانش، نفر اول باشی تا آنکه در پهنه یک امپراتوری بزرگ، نفر دوم. اما این منطق که ممکن است موتوری برای پیشرفت به حساب آید و ایجاد تخصص های زیادی در زمینه پژوهش بکند، در عین حال ممکن است به اتمیزه کرده آن نیز منجر به شود و تعداد بی شماری خرده تخصص به وجود آورد. بنابراین امروز وقت آن رس

👍65👏2

6 May 2025, 17:21 UTC≈20,700 views100 reactionsread 3 September 2026

دولتی که پرورش روح و اعتلای نفس افراد خود را محدود می‌کند و یا در حداقل نگه می‌دارد، دولتی که افراد را کوچک می‌کند تا بهتر بر آنها مسلط باشد هر چند که از تسلط بر آنان نفع آنان را در نظر داشته باشد، روزی متوجه می‌شود که با افراد کوچک و ناتوان کارهای بزرگ نمی‌توان کرد. چنین دولتی روزی پی خواهد برد که کفایت دستگاه حکومت که به خاطر آن همه چیز را فدا کرده است برای او حاصلی ندارد زیرا نیروی حیاتی و محرکی را که برای چرخاندن

👍6917👌7💯6👎1

5 May 2025, 13:29 UTC≈17,300 views31 reactionsread 3 September 2026

‍ ☄هژمونی: دیروز,امروز و فردا (بازخوانی ارای گرامشی) ✍محمدامین سلیمانی 🔻 منظومه‌فکری گرامشی به هیچ عنوان چشم اندازی کوتاه‌مدت را در برابر دیدگان مخاطبان خود قرار نمی‌دهد, به نحوی که توامان به گسست‌ها و پیوست‌های تاریخ نظر دارد. به عنوان‌مثال او با اطلاع از شکست انقلابات‌سوسیالیستی در اروپا پس از پیروزی انقلاب‌ کبیر اکتبر و مشاهده سیطره فاشیسم در ایتالیا, استراتژی "جنگ‌موضعی" را طرح‌ریزی کرد که شکل ابزارگرایانه داشت

👍1712👎2

3 May 2025, 22:26 UTC≈13,400 views49 reactionsread 3 September 2026

هنگامی که فرومایگان در گسترش تباهی و شر با هم متحد می‌شوند، اگر مردمان به یاری یکدیگر نیایند، یک‌ به‌ یک فرو‌ خواهند افتاد و بی‌رحمانه قربانی تحقیر و شکستی رقت‌آور خواهند شد؛ یادمان باشد که پلیدی و شر را نه فقط باید افشاء کرد که باید شکست داد . #ادموند_برک

👍378🙏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kavosh_garan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

وبسایت فرهنگی صدانت
@Sedanet · 21,666
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 September 2026
جامعه‌شناسی
@iransociology · 37,496
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
سخنرانی‌ها
@sokhanranihaa · 131,755
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
پروپوزال _ پایان نامه _ مقاله
@Proposal · 24,172
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 September 2026
Sherwin Vakili (شروین وکیلی)
@sherwin_vakili · 22,095
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 September 2026
پادکست انگلیسیMP3+PDF
@voa_learning_english · 73,931
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📶درسگفتارهای جامعه شناسی” (@kavosh_garan), 17,774 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kavosh_garan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.