Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сексолог | Полина Девочкина 18+

Channel

Сексолог | Полина Девочкина 18+

@keksfakt2

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

25,140subscribers

-2,179 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001525643265
TypeChannel
Username@keksfakt2
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/keksfakt2

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,14027,31926,229.57 August 2026 — 27,319 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,319 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,211 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,164 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,130 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,110 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,072 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,033 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,989 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,955 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,917 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,904 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,621 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,755 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,684 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,578 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,559 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,529 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,284 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,278 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,238 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,225 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,224 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,220 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,213 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,201 subscribers4 September 2026 — 26,159 subscribers6 September 2026 — 25,975 subscribers9 September 2026 — 25,275 subscribers12 September 2026 — 25,225 subscribers13 September 2026 — 25,207 subscribers15 September 2026 — 25,156 subscribers17 September 2026 — 25,140 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -2,179. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,813–27,646 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 08:1825,140-16
15 Sept 2026, 11:2025,156-51
13 Sept 2026, 18:5825,207-18
12 Sept 2026, 01:1825,225-50
9 Sept 2026, 19:3725,275-700
6 Sept 2026, 14:4125,975-184
4 Sept 2026, 05:4026,159-42
2 Sept 2026, 18:0626,201-12
1 Sept 2026, 14:4426,213-7
31 Aug 2026, 14:1226,220-4
30 Aug 2026, 12:4426,224-1
29 Aug 2026, 15:3426,225-13
28 Aug 2026, 17:0226,238-40
27 Aug 2026, 15:5926,278-6
26 Aug 2026, 15:0326,284-245
25 Aug 2026, 11:4526,529-30
24 Aug 2026, 13:5326,559-19
22 Aug 2026, 20:4626,578-106
21 Aug 2026, 13:1326,684-71
20 Aug 2026, 11:4426,755first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.95%
avg views ÷ 25,140 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,000
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held24 (23 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total11,990
Reactions total416
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 24s
Average length
1m 34s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,470 reactions across 24 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31321.3%
😁29319.9%
😱1459.86%
🔥1349.12%
💯1339.05%
👍936.33%
💘885.99%
😢674.56%
❤‍🔥533.61%
👌312.11%
181.22%
😍171.16%
🍌151.02%
custom 5422566025616988077140.952%
🦄130.884%
🍓120.816%
😈110.748%
👏100.68%
🕊40.272%
🤓40.272%
2 further kinds20.136%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,470 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
8.33%
2 of 24 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,140
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,290
over 22 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqveLe2E125 July 202625 July 2026
2W5zFGPoaG913 August 20263 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 04:53 UTC≈1,290 views68 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🔥 Как подлечить кукуху с помощью секса Я, конечно, не предлагаю вместо психотерапии купить наручники. Но в психологии есть концепция корректирующего эмоционального опыта: когда знакомую болезненную ситуацию мы вдруг проживаем по совершенно другому сценарию. А секс отличная площадка для таких экспериментов 🤩 🤩Тревожная привязанность и вечное «я должна заслужить любовь» → попробовать роль Госпожи. Если женщина прив

🔥40💯1211💘4🍓1

31 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC≈1,640 views66 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🍑 Ты не жадина, ты - «анальник» Я, конечно, не Вероника Степанова, но тоже хочу сегодня поговорить об анальниках. В 1908 году Фрейд описал так называемый «анальный характер». Согласно его теории, в возрасте примерно 1–3 лет ребёнок проходит анальную стадию психосексуального развития: обнаруживает, что содержимое собственного кишечника можно не только торжественно предъявить маме, но и придержать. И вот если на это

37😁1210🔥3😈2🍓1💯1

29 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC≈2,050 views99 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

😋«Гейские шутки - это признак уверенности в гетеросексуальности» Вот такой парадокс) Вы наверняка слышали, как в мужских компаниях сплошь и рядом шутят на очень гомосексуальные темы. Как так? Зачем? К сожалению, всерьез об этом никаких исследований не было. Но было множество интернет опросов и тем на форумах с разбором этого феномена. Причем это существует не только среди русскоязычных мужчин. Этому явлению даже

😁5421💯15🔥8😢1

28 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC≈2,140 views28 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🍬СОЛЕНАЯ КАРАМЕЛЬ🍬 Я уже делала обзор на лубриканты со вкусом вишни и манго-персик в линейке Гельтек love - и это было офигенно вкусно. И соленая карамель не отстает. Это вообще не приторный вкус, даже есть легкая кислинка и отчетливое сливочное послевкусие. А главное - не остается никакой липкости. И аромат… ммм… Даже после слизывания с тела остается этот карамельный десертный шлейф. И я не перестаю повторять,

17🔥7💘4

27 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC≈2,230 views69 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

✍️ Bumble отказался от своей главной идеи: женщины больше не обязаны писать первыми. Кто еще знает, Bumble - это приложение для знакомств (ушли из РФ), где главный концепт был в том, что первой может написать только девушка. Причем метч открыт только сутки. В итоге, теперь приложение разрешило мужчинам писать после мэтча первыми. Период ответа также увеличили с 24 до 72 часов. Почему? 66% опрошенных женщин Bumble

😁3815🔥8😢5👍1💋1😈1

25 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC≈2,640 views86 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🩷Парадокс вложений в отношения🩷 Увидела тут этот мем и прям да. К сожалению, так все и устроено на начальных порах. Не хочу опускаться в гендерные войны, буду говорить в целом про восприятие стараний для партнера. Существует такая иллюзия, мол, чем больше мы всего хорошего сделаем для партнера, чтобы впечатлить, тем больше шансов что в нас влюбятся, что нас выберут и тд 👉Но часто получается все ровно наоборот👉 ➡

💘44💯2216👍4

21 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC≈3,290 views86 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

💔 Можно ли найти оправдание измене? Никто, конечно, не выдаст вам справку с разрешением изменить. Да и понятие это очень размытое. В каком-то смысле вы уже это сделали. Ментально. И как сексолог я лишь могу сказать что это закономерно. У вас, судя по описанию, не исчезло либидо. ➡️Исчезло желание в конкретной сексуальной системе с мужем, где вас воспринимают не как участницу секса, а как объект куда можно в любой

😢559💯9👍6😱5❤‍🔥2

15 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC≈4,940 views104 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🍌Грудь или 🍌попа? Учёные наконец-то занялись действительно важным вопросом 😁 И у нас, кажется, появился научный ответ. В свежем исследовании взяли 395 норвежских мужчин и попросили оценить по шкале от 1 до 5, насколько для них важны грудь и ягодицы женщины при выборе партнёрши. Средний возраст мужчин 22,8 года, большинство были в возрасте 21–25 лет. При этом 62,5% были одиноки, а 37,5% состояли в отношениях. И в

😁54👍15custom 54225660256169880771413💘4💯4

14 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈4,410 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥152💘2💯2

12 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC≈3,530 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

У меня есть подозрение, что половина моего интереса к психологии появилась из желания однажды понять: «А С ЧЕГО ВООБЩЕ Я ТАКАЯ?» 🤩 К слову, я в психологии варюсь уже 10-й год. Сначала как человек, влюбившийся в психотерапию, потом уже как профессионал. Потому что одно дело - ощущать, что да, вот ты тревожишься, прокрастинируешь, периодически выгораешь, выбираешь из раза в раз каких-то подозрительно похожих друг на

9🔥4💘2

12 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC≈2,980 views114 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

😐 История как из за неудачного дикпика пришлось уволиться У меня была подруга детства, у которой мой бывший муж занял денег и перестал отдавать. А я уже была в декрете и не могла за него отдать ей деньги и так мы, естественно, поссорились на несколько лет. И вот когда я развелась и заработала достаточно денег - хотела отдать ей долг за мужа. Но вот незадача, она переехала и сменила номер. А хотелось как-то красиво

😁7720👍11😱6

12 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC≈3,080 views55 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🤩 «То, что ты мне нравишься, не значит, что я хочу твой дикпик» Совсем недавно выложили исследование о том как женщины реагируют на дикпики. Честно говоря, удивлена, что так серьезно занялись этим вопросом) - 60,1% женщин в основной выборке уже получали незапрошенные фото гениталий. - Причем среди тех, кто получал, 21,4% сталкивались с этим пять и более раз. Чаще всего отправителями были незнакомые мужчины - 65,6%

😁347👏75💘2

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @keksfakt2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@keksfakt2 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
1 September 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сексолог | Полина Девочкина 18+” (@keksfakt2), 25,140 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/keksfakt2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.