https://x.com/twoong_p/status/2083852090091393181?s=46 특이점이 오긴 왔다. 🙃

Channel
특이점이 온다
@kkda8282
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,242subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002365536243 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kkda8282 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kkda8282 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 1,242 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 1,247 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 1,248 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 1,249 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 1,251 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 1,252 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 1,253 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 1,252 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 1,256 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 1,256 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 53s
- Average length
- 53s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
장중 코멘트를 잘 안하는 편인데 워낙 이례적이라 한번 코멘트 남깁니다. 손익비가 괜찮아진 지점에 왔다고 판단하고 매수로 대응하는게 맞다고 슬슬 생각이 듭니다. 대충 화수목 분할로 매수하면 될 거 같은데, KOSPI 지수가 생긴 후 이 정도 투매는 시스템리스크인 IMF, 금융위기, 코로나 말고는 비교할 만한 경우가 없습니다. 현 시장이 워낙에 힘들다보니 도움이 되셨으면 하여 무료로 공개합니다. [차트1] KOSPI 60일 이격 (1990~현재) [차트2] KOSPI 60일 이격 (2010~현재) [표1] 매크로 일정 (2026.7.5째주) [차트3] KOSPI 지수 Vs KOSPI 3개월 수익률 (2010~현재) [차트4] KOSDAQ 신용잔고 / 시가총액 비율 [차트5] KOSPI 신용잔고 / 시가총액 비율 https://naver.…
Photo, posted without a caption
이제 반대가 되버리고 있네요... 🫠
Photo, posted without a caption
아침에 일이 있어서 이제 시장을 보는데 재밌는일이 있었네요 이 쪽으로는 이 분이 탑이라서 글 여러개 링크 첨부합니다 https://t.me/Web3LearningWithInger/1930 https://t.me/Web3LearningWithInger/1932 https://t.me/Web3LearningWithInger/1934 https://t.me/Web3LearningWithInger/1939
특이점이 온다. 🙃
오푸스5로 24시간동안 만든 게임... https://longsilence.anshu.dev/ https://github.com/achimala/TheLongSilence https://x.com/anshuc/status/2081801979131818412
주린이 선생님들, 이제 코인판으로 돌아오세요. 😁
[업비트·빗썸 다 합쳐도 역부족…'SK하이닉스 레버리지' 한 종목이 7배 추월] 삼성자산운용의 'KODEX SK하이닉스단일종목레버리지' 일평균 거래대금이 국내 5대 가상자산 거래소 전체 거래량을 합친 것보다 7배 높은 것으로 나타났다고 전자신문이 전했다. 해당 KODEX 상품은 KRX SK하이닉스 지수의 일간 변동률을 2배로 추종하는 상품으로, 이달 1일부터 27일까지 일평균 거래대금은 4조5383억원이었다. 한편, 같은 기간(ETF 18거래일 기준) 업비트와 빗썸, 코인원, 코빗, 고팍스 등 거래소 5곳의 일평균 거래대금은 약 6503억원이었다. https://coinness.com/news/1164079 기사보기: https://www.etnews.com/20260728000250
철구 자수한다네 도박으로 10억 사채쓰고 이자만 40억인데 그걸 빌려준게 열혈팬 아프리카TV << 이전부터 말 많았는데 돈세탁 카르텔이 맞나보다 ㄹㅇ 풀영상 https://m.fmkorea.com/10138436526
와우 Opus5 출시 성능은 Fable 5 보다 좋으면서 가격은 쌈. Fable 왜 쓰죠?
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kkda8282. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@coinnesskr · 31,0032 posts싸이버트럭
@cybertruck666 · 10,4721 post그냥 해
@dailytrashshit · 1961 post코인씨커의 일기장
@honey_box_main · 5,1071 post쉬었음청년 집가고싶다
@Iwanttogohome09 · 5,7341 postNutty flavors — AI, On-chain, Stocks
@nuttyflavors · 2,1781 postPluto Research_발간자료
@strategynote · 3,7631 post성연이의 바이브
@sy_vibe · 1,4041 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“특이점이 온다” (@kkda8282), 1,242 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kkda8282.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.