Сколько времени провёл Робинзон Крузо в России? Роман о приключениях Робинзона Крузо имеет продолжение, в котором герой терпит кораблекрушение у берегов Юго-Восточной Азии и вынужден добираться в Европу через всю Россию. В частности, Робинзон рассказывает, как в течение восьми месяцев пережидал зиму в Тобольске. 📚 Книжист | Подписаться

Channel
Книжист
@knizist
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,932subscribers
-181 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002068365965 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @knizist |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/knizist |
Topic
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 8,932 | -34 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 8,966 | -37 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 9,003 | -20 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:52 | 9,023 | -23 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 9,046 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 9,048 | -15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 9,063 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 9,072 | -12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 9,084 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 9,090 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 9,098 | -15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 9,113 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 9,113 | first reading |
Engagement
133 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.80%
- avg views ÷ 8,932 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 340
- 34 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.03%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 34
- of 133 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 133 (4 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,547 |
| Reactions total | 253 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 51s
- Average length
- 1m 51s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
959 reactions across 94 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 555 | 57.9% | |
| 👍 | 138 | 14.4% | |
| 🔥 | 69 | 7.19% | |
| 😁 | 68 | 7.09% | |
| 💯 | 43 | 4.48% | |
| 😢 | 13 | 1.36% | |
| 🤓 | 12 | 1.25% | |
| 😱 | 11 | 1.15% | |
| 🤷♀ | 11 | 1.15% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 0.938% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 0.73% | |
| 😍 | 6 | 0.626% | |
| ✍ | 4 | 0.417% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 0.313% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.313% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.313% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 0.209% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.209% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 97 of the 133 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 959 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Posted without readable text
Зощенко пытался покончить с собой? Знаменитый сатирик Михаил Зощенко тяжело переживал жизненные неурядицы в школьные годы, особенно те, которые касались его писательского таланта. В 19 лет он проходил выпускные экзамены — и получил единицу за сочинение по русскому языку. Отметка так расстроила выпускника, что тот проглотил сильный яд — кристалл сулемы. К счастью, Зощенко удалось спасти. Через много лет в автобиогра…
Posted without readable text
Спасибо, жизнь, за то что вновь приходит день, Что зреет хлеб и что взрослеют дети. Спасибо, жизнь, тебе за всех родных людей, Живущих на таком огромном свете. Спасибо, жизнь, за то, что этот щедрый век Звучал во мне то щедростью, то болью За ширь твоих дорог, в которых человек, Все испытав, становится собою. За то, что ты река без берегов, За каждую весну твою и зиму, За всех друзей и даже за врагов- Спасибо жизнь…
❤15
Posted without readable text
#Цитаты «У меня непритязательный вкус - достаточно самого лучшего». — Оскар Уайльд 📚 Книжист | Подписаться
❤5😁5🔥4
У врат обители святой Стоял просящий подаянья Бедняк иссохший, чуть живой От глада, жажды и страданья. Куска лишь хлеба он просил, И взор являл живую муку, И кто-то камень положил В его протянутую руку. Так я молил твоей любви С слезами горькими, с тоскою; Так чувства лучшие мои Обмануты навек тобою! ✍🏼М. Лермонтов «Нищий» 📚 Книжист | Подписаться
🔥8😢4❤1
Posted without readable text
У каждого человека — не часто, не искусственно, но само собой, и только в день очень хороший, среди других, просто хороших дней, наступает потребность оглянуться, даже побыть тем, каким был когда-то. Она — сродни перебиранию старых писем. А. С. Грин, «Бегущая по волнам» 📚 Книжист | Подписаться
Posted without readable text
Буратино создан из образа девочки. На создание знакомого каждому ребенку образа Буратино художника Леонида Владимирского вдохновила его пятилетняя дочь. Когда он работал над рисунками, она позировала ему, привязав длинный нос из картона. Стоит отметить, что Владимирский отошел от книжного описания. Алексей Толстой одел своего героя в белый колпачок и коричневую курточку. Художник же изменил расцветку одежды: курточ…
😁12❤1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 133 posts we hold for @knizist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mysli_literature · 66,190
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 August 2026
@audio_freebook · 23,687
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 September 2026
@midnight_poetry · 39,653
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
@tim_philosophy · 67,686
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
@pos_lov · 40,676
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 30 August 2026
@academicpavlov · 114,488
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
@tsitaty_dnevniki_stikhi · 165,339
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 August 2026
@open_letters · 41,123
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
@Letters_in_the_Desk · 70,362
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
@prostyazikom · 4
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
@museums_of_the_world · 24,169
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
@historyshedewr · 43,726
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
@etiquette_pv · 29,704
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
@tsitatyu · 42,115
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
@tsitaty_mudroe_slovo · 36,564
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 September 2026
@prav_etiketa · 43,444
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
@body_Ianguage · 1
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 25 August 2026
@Jung_tsitaty_psyhoIogia · 63,822
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Книжист” (@knizist), 8,932 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/knizist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.