Channel
@kolpikovdesign
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
579subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002203584422 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kolpikovdesign |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kolpikovdesign |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:02 | 579 | +6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 573 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 572 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 571 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 569 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 569 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
128 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 49 | 38.3% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 18.8% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 11.7% | |
| 🕊 | 14 | 10.9% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 7.03% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 3.91% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 2.34% | |
| custom 5389034210914749192 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.781% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Покажу, что стало с «Кириллицей» — я её тут как-то уже показывал, это моя искалка кириллических шрифтов. Смысл простой: понять, нужен тебе шрифт или нет, прямо на месте — не скачивая, не ставя в систему, не открывая макет. Тестер. Вбиваете свой текст — заголовок, фамилию, цену со знаком рубля — и смотрите на нём, а не на мягких французских булках. Пара. Сервис замеряет буквы вживую: рост строчных, плотность, округ…
🔥5👍4👏2
Доброе утро. На выходных сделал детальный анализ своего канала целиком — всё, что написал с декабря 2024-го. Занятие не из приятных, но полезное. Получилась вот какая картина. Канал называется «Колпиков про дизайн», а дизайна в нём за последний год осталось всего ничего. Зато прибавилось трибуны, с которой я в основном бухчу: то нейронки не те, то интернет не тот, то жизнь навалилась. Понять меня, в общем, можно — …
🔥6👌2custom 53890342109147491922
Так и есть.
😁6💯2
Установил на айфона Gemini ассистента. Оказался он кривоватый и тормозной. Да ещё изрядно устаревший. Например, модели Anthropic для него существуют версий 3.7, СhatGPT версии 4o… Думает долго — это вам не молниеносный (но весьма брехливый) Perplexity. Google долго не обновляет свою модель, явно что-то замышляя. Как в том году они внезапно выпилили сразу всех конкурентов, выдав этот самый Gemini 3 и особенно генерат…
🔥2👍1🤓1
Вчера вечером, перед сном, набросал свой первый рилс 🎬 Не судите строго — это вообще мой первый опыт монтажа видео. Генерации получились так себе: токенов было мало, использовал недорогую Veo Omni Flash — что уж тут поделать 🤷♂️ Монтировал в CapCut. Она вроде как бесплатная… но как выяснилось, большая часть крутых фич — платные. Спокойно накрутил себе красивый монтаж, а при экспорте — сюрприз: «оплатите подписку» …
👍7🔥7👏3😁2
Posted without readable text
🔥2👍1
Posted without readable text
🔥2👍1👏1
Posted without readable text
🔥5👍1👏1
С сегодняшнего дня — официально безработный.
🕊14👏4✍2👍1
Video, posted without a caption
Чутка о жизненном. Телевизора у меня нет сосем. Давно его не смотрю. Да и нечего там смотреть. Новости читаю только в специализированных каналах про дизайн, музыку, IT и технологии, науку, путешествия, кино, литературу и театр. Всё остальное меня не особо интересует. Фильмы в последнее время смотрю редко. Ничего путного. Из сериалов как-то тоже ничего особо не цепляет. Хотя вот «Извне» (From) ништяковый. Люблю таку…
🔥9👍5👏3
Друзья, вышла большая статья с культурологическим взглядом на дизайн через необычную призму. Почитайте, поставьте лайк, оставьте комментарий. И не забудьте репостнуть своим знакомым. 🫳 Статья #статья #дизайн
🔥9👍3❤🔥2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @kolpikovdesign. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КПД ∷ Колпиков про дизайн” (@kolpikovdesign), 579 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kolpikovdesign.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.