Posted without readable text
🤡6✍2😁2👨💻1🤓1

Channel
@kostromama
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,016subscribers
+24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001262579475 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kostromama |
| Created | 21 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kostromama |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:19 | 10,016 | +2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 10,014 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 10,015 | -3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 10,018 | +1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 10,017 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:35 | 10,022 | +24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 9,998 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 9,996 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 9,999 | +7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 9,992 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 9,991 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 9,990 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 9,991 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 9,992 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 9,992 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (19 June 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 430 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 04:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
633 reactions across 22 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 129 | 20.4% | |
| 😁 | 95 | 15.0% | |
| 🤬 | 63 | 9.95% | |
| 🤣 | 55 | 8.69% | |
| 🤮 | 48 | 7.58% | |
| ❤ | 45 | 7.11% | |
| 🤷♂ | 32 | 5.06% | |
| 💩 | 31 | 4.90% | |
| 🤔 | 27 | 4.27% | |
| 😐 | 13 | 2.05% | |
| 🤪 | 12 | 1.90% | |
| ✍ | 8 | 1.26% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 1.11% | |
| 🙉 | 7 | 1.11% | |
| 🙈 | 6 | 0.948% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 0.948% | |
| 🥴 | 6 | 0.948% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 0.79% | |
| 🤓 | 5 | 0.79% | |
| 👨💻 | 4 | 0.632% | |
| 13 further kinds | 29 | 4.58% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 633 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
🤡6✍2😁2👨💻1🤓1
Вестник местных выборов в Костромской области Что интересного в нашей местной политике произошло на самом низком муниципальном уровне? Как известно, костромская глубинка умеет преподносить политические сюрпризы, поэтому теперь к ней относятся вполне серьезно. Сильный пример: происходящее в Нерехте, где список КПРФ на выборы в местную думу Нерехты снимают из-за придирок к оформлению документов и прочих формальностей…
🤬11🤷♂4❤2🥱2👍1👏1💩1🤔1
Главный предвыборный атрибут костромских политиков снова в деле Мы, если что, о строительстве второго моста — неизменной теме любого предвыборного лета в Костроме. Тему снова достали с пыльных антресолей и потрясли над ушами костромичей. На этот раз — руками главного кандидата в Госдуму от области Алексея Анохина и министра транспорта Андрея Никитина. Вчера тему мусолили под соусом того, что мост обязательно будет п…
🤡24😁4👍2👎1🤓1😐1
Деревенский антикриз от костромских властей В начале недели федеральный ресурс — тг-канал Shot выпустил свой рейтинг регионов по упразднению заброшенных деревень. У него Костромская область оказалась на первом месте с 21 упраздненной деревенькой в этом году (в прошлом — 144 населенных пункта). Упразднение заброшенных деревень — рутинный административный процесс, но это как симптом гнетущей урбанизации, от которой об…
🤬16🤷♂4❤2😁2😐2🤔1
Губернатор постеснялся пива Вчера пресс-служба Сергея Ситникова опубликовала сочный фоторепортаж о посещении главой региона костромской пивоварни Пирна. Там фигурирует все, что связано с пивоварением, но самого слова из четырех букв видимо у нас боятся как огня. На фото мы видим большие пивные баки, надписи Премиум лагер, пивоваренный солод, но дважды два так и не сложилось в четыре. Для обозначения пива помощники …
🤡19🥴6❤3🤝3🤣3🤓2🍾1
Перс-трюкач произвел фуррор в костромском и отечественном футболе Иранский легионер костромского Спартака вчера оформил голевую передачу на капитана клуба в матче со СКА-Хабаровск. Надер Мохаммади еще в иранском чемпионате был известен своими сальто-передачами, а теперь подтвердил свое реноме в России. В интервью он рассказал, что давно тренирует такой прием и использует его вполне осознанно. Что интересно, вчера к…
❤9🔥2🤝2🤡2🤪2🙊1
В канун выборов в Костроме отменился турнир по спортивной рыбалке Организаторы турнира по рыбной ловле Big Game КОстрома объявили об отмене мероприятия, которое было намечено на 5-6 сентября. Формулировка в их посте весьма расплывчатая: "Решение принято в связи с тяжелой обстановкой в стране и действующими обстоятельствами непреодолимой силы" В последнее время такие формулировки используются организаторами мероприят…
🤔9🤡6❤2😁2😐2🐳1
Сформировался честный договорнячок между кандидатами 1 августа при Общественной палате и Облизбиркоме пять кандидатов по одномандатному округу в Госдуму подписали соглашение о чистых и честных выборах. Всего кандидатов по этой кампании, если что, семь. За бортом соглашения остались Валерий Ижицкий (КПРФ) и Андрей Тарасов (Яблоко). Такие соглашения "О чистых выборах" — уже символическая традиция, и она означает отню…
🤣6🙈6❤2✍1🤔1🤡1🤷♂1😐1
+3 млн рублей за год Таково повышение официального дохода спикера облдумы Анохина — это заметно из сравнения предвыборных деклараций Алексея Алексеевича за прошлый год и к текущим выборам в Госдуму. В интернете сохранилась предвыборная декларация Алексея Анохина к выборам в облдуму, тогда он отчитался о заработке в 2024 году 4,4 млн руб. В этом году Анохин отчитался ЦИКу соответственно о доходах за 2025 год — 7,6 мл…
🤬10🤡5🙉4🤷♂2❤1🤨1
Невероятная предвыборная щедрость костромских депутатов Завтра депутаты областной думы, согласно документам к заседанию, планируют разрешить жителям региона бесплатно собирать валежник и использовать для этого даже бензопилы. 23 июля состоится последнее заседание костромских депутатов перед выборами в Госдуму, наши избранники планируют сломать стереотип о том, что они умеют только запрещать все на свете. По сему, о…
🤣29🤡6❤2🤬2💩1🤨1🤷♂1
Антикризисная посевная Посевная кампания, которую так любит губернатор давно прошла, а вот антикризисные "посевы" — это хлеб smm-щиков из команды губернатора. "Посев" на слэнге всех, кто знаком с соцсетями, — это буквально распространение определенной информации везде, где можно. В данном случае посевы у нас простые: по госпабликам массово раскидывают статьи госиздания "Костромские ведомости". Что интересно, к тако…
🤮13🤣10✍2❤2👨💻2😐2🔥1😁1
Posted without readable text
😁11❤5🤮4🤷♂4🤡2🙉2👏1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @kostromama. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Костромать” (@kostromama), 10,016 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kostromama.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.